Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:21:05.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of British Anthomyiid Flies. IX.—Biology of the Onion Fly, Delia antiqua (Mg.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Mary Miles
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London.

Summary

The Onion Fly (Delia antiqua (Mg.)) was bred at Wye, Kent, under insectary and laboratory conditions to obtain further information on its biology and reactions to various temperatures.

A comparison of the times of emergence of overwintering generations of Onion Fly and Cabbage Root Fly (Erioischia brassicae (Bch.)) in an insectary showed that the former emerged consistently about a month later than the latter. This supported the observations of previous workers that the Onion Fly was not active in the field until late May.

A diet containing protein was necessary for oviposition. The length of the preoviposition period was affected by temperature. Flies maintained at 25°C. laid eggs in 10–24 days, with an average of 15 days. At spring and summer laboratory temperatures (12–29°C.) the preoviposition period was 10–25 days, with an average of 15 days; and in autumn and winter (11–20°) it was 11–46 days with an average of 21 days. Flies maintained at 6–8° did not lay eggs.

Flies in captivity laid up to 123 eggs at the rate of 1–45 per day. Intervals between batches of eggs varied from 1–9 days, and the oviposition period was 7–25 days. Flies lived up to 6 days after oviposition.

The incubation period depended on the temperature. Eggs at 25°C. hatched in 2 days; at 20° in 3–4 days; at 15° in 4–6 days; and at 7–10° in 9–14 days.

The temperature also affected the duration of larval and pupal stages. At 25°C. the successive larval stadia required 2, 2 and 5–9 days, respectively. Lowering the temperature increased the time for development until at 9–11° the three larval stadia required 8–12, 8–18 and 24–37 days, respectively. At 25° the pupal stage lasted 12–17 days; at 20° it was 16–25 days, and at 15° it was from 35 days to over a year. At 25–30° the development from egg to adult was completed in 25 days; at 25° it required 28 days; at 22–27°, 30 days; at 19–24°, 33 days.

At 25°C. the Onion Fly bred continuously without diapause. When larvae were reared at temperatures below about 18° pupal development was often retarded. Pupae formed from larvae reared at 12–18° and maintained at approximately that temperature, required 94–442 days to complete their development. By raising the temperature of pupae formed from larvae reared below 18°, it was demonstrated that a true diapause had been induced. Of 54 pupae raised to 25°, 8 (15%) completed their development in the expected time (13–16 days) and 46 (85%) required 94–208 days. Of 322 pupae formed from larvae reared in an insectary in May and June at 10–18° and exposed to July temperatures of 13–20°, 37 (11%) emerged in 25–35 days and 252 (78%) required 234–294 days. Similarly, of 283 pupae formed from larvae reared at 12–21° and exposed to a temperature of 15–23°, 30 (11%) completed their development in 21–31 days while 253 (89%) required 118–341 days. Exposure to low temperatures was not necessary to terminate pupal diapause.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, A. D. (1928). The habits of the Onion Maggot Flies (Hylemyia antiqua Meigen).—58th Rep. ent. Soc. Ont., 1927, pp. 6167.Google Scholar
Baker, A. D. & Stewart, K. E. (1928). The Onion Root-maggot (Hylemyia antiqua Meig.) on the Island of Montreal.—20th Rep. Quebec Soc. Prot. Pl., 1927–28, pp. 93130.Google Scholar
Eyer, J. B. (1922). The bionomics and control of the Onion Maggot.—Bull. Pa agric. Exp. Sta., no. 171, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. & Treherne, R. C. (1916). The Cabbage Boot Maggot (Phorbia brassicae Bouché) and its control in Canada, with notes on the Imported Onion Maggot (Hylemyia antiqua Mg.) and the Seed-corn Maggot (Phorbia fugciceps Zett.).—Bull. ent. Br. Can., no. 12, 58 pp.Google Scholar
Kästner, A. (1929). Untersuchungen zur Lebensweise und Bekämpfung der Zwiebelfliege (Hylemyia antiqua Meigen). II. Teil. Morphologie und Biologie.—Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 15, pp. 363422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maan, W. J. (1945). Biologie en phaenologie van de uienvlieg, Chortophila antiqua (Meigen) en de preimot, Acrolepia assectella (Zeller), als grondslag voor de bestrijding.—Meded. Tuinb Voorlichtingsdienst, no. 39, 92 pp.Google Scholar
Miles, M. (1955). Studies of British Anthomyiid flies. VI. The annual cycle of generations in some Anthomyiid root flies.—Bull. ent. Res., 46, pp. 1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severin, H. H. P. & Severin, H. C. (1915). Life-history, natural enemies and the poisoned bait spray as a method of control of the Imported Onion Fly (Phorbia cepetorum Meade) with notes on other onion pests.—J. econ. Ent., 8, pp. 342350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. M. (1922). A study of the life-history of the Onion Fly (Hylemyia antiqua, Meigen).—Ann. appl. Biol., 9, pp. 177183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1953). The principles of insect physiology.—5th edn., 546 pp. London, Methuen; New York, Dutton.Google Scholar
Wright, D. W. (1938). The control of the Onion Fly.—J. Minist. Agric., 44, pp. 10811087.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. & Kirkpatrick, T. W. (1924). A multiple temperature incubator.—Bull. Minist. Agric. Egypt, no. 38, 4 pp.Google Scholar