Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T17:34:10.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sources of semiochemicals mediating host finding in Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. Babu ,
A. Hern  and
S. Dorn
A. Babu
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Sciences, Applied Entomology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Clausiusstrasse 25/NW, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
A. Hern
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Sciences, Applied Entomology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Clausiusstrasse 25/NW, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
S. Dorn*
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Sciences, Applied Entomology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Clausiusstrasse 25/NW, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
*
*Fax: +41 1 632 1171 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bruchid pests such as Callosobruchus chinensis (Linnaeus) endanger stored legume seeds throughout the tropical belt. The chemical composition of the headspace volatiles from healthy and fourth instar larvae-infested cowpea seeds were identified, characterized, and compared using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Y-tube olfactometer bioassays were performed to evaluate the effect of these chemicals on the orientation of conspecific adult females. Analysis of volatiles released from healthy and infested seeds revealed qualitative differences for three out of the 17 compounds identified. Dimethyl disulphide, isobutenyl methyl ketone and methyl trisulphide were found only in the blend emitted from infested but not from healthy seeds. Quantitative differences were apparent for tridecane which was released in larger amounts from infested seeds. While volatiles collected from healthy seeds were attractive to female bruchids, volatiles collected from infested seeds were repellent. To test the hypothesis that the qualitative differences in the chemical composition found may be due to insect-derived components, the volatiles from frass and fourth instar larvae combined were analysed. These volatiles contained both of the sulphides emitted from infested seed but not from healthy seeds. Although a limited induction of volatiles from cowpea seeds cannot be excluded, it is postulated that behavioural differences of the female weevils are largely due to insect-derived semiochemicals. The potential use of such semiochemicals as part of an integrated pest management strategy is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 93 , Issue 3 , June 2003 , pp. 187 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abate, T. & Ampofo, J.K.O. (1996) Insect pests of common bean in Africa: their ecology and management. Annual Review of Entomology 41, 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abate, T., van Huis, A. & Ampofo, J.K.O. (2000) Pest management strategies in traditional agriculture: an African perspective. Annual Review of Entomology 45, 631–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A., Lal, S. & Gupta, K.C. (1988) Natural products as protectants of pulses against pulse beetles. Bulletin of Grain Technology 26, 154–164.Google Scholar
Agelopoulos, N., Birkett, M.A., Hick, A.J., Hooper, A.M., Pickett, J.A., Pow, E.M., Smart, L.E., Smiley, D.W.M., Wadhams, L.J. & Woodcock, C.M. (1999) Exploiting semiochemicals in insect control. Pesticide Science 55, 225–235.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boevé, J.L., Lengwiler, U., Tollsten, L., Dorn, S. & Turlings, T.C.J. (1996) Volatiles emitted by apple fruitlets infested by larvae of the European apple sawfly. Phytochemistry 42, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, W.J. (1999) In Practical nonparametric statistics. 3rd edn. 584 pp. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Cork, A., Hall, D.R., Blaney, W.M. & Simmonds, M.S.J. (1991) Identification of a component of the female sex pheromone of Callosobruchus analis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Tetrahedron Letters 32, 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, M. (1999) Are herbivore-induced plant volatiles reliable indicators of herbivore identity to foraging carnivorous arthropods?. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 91, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hern, A. & Dorn, S. (1999) Sexual dimorphism in the olfactory orientation of adult Cydia pomonella in response to α-farnesene. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 92, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hern, A. & Dorn, S. (2001) Induced emissions of apple fruit volatiles by the codling moth: changing patterns with different time periods after infestation and larval instars of the herbivore. Phytochemistry 57, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hern, A. & Dorn, S. (2002) Induction of volatile emissions from ripening fruits infested with Cydia pomonella and the attraction of adult females. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 102, 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, G.W. & Rouault, J. (2000) Introduction to randomisation tests. http://www.bioss.ac.uk/smart/unix/mrandt/slides/frames.htmGoogle Scholar
Ignacimuthu, S., Wäckers, F.L. & Dorn, S. (2000) The role of chemical cues in host finding and acceptance by Callosobruchus chinensis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 96, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanaujia, K.R. & Levison, H.Z. (1981) Phagostimulatory responses and oviposition behavor of Sitophilus granarius L. to newly harvested and stored wheat grains. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 91, 417–424.Google Scholar
Lwande, W., McDowell, P.G., Amiani, H. & Amoke, P. (1989) Analysis of airborne volatiles of cowpea. Phytochemistry 28, 421–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbata, G.N., Shu, S. & Ramaswamy, S.B. (1999) Responses of normal and active males of Callosobruchus subinnotatus to female sex pheromone. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 92, 594–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbata, G.N., Shu, S. & Ramaswamy, S.B. (2000) Sex pheromones of Callosobruchus subinnotatus and C. maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): congeneric responses and role of air movement. Bulletin of Entomological Research 90, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F.J., Barmore, J.L. & Renwick, J.A.A. (1987) Oviposition deterrent from eggs of Callosobruchus maculatus: spacing mechanism or artifact?. Journal of Chemical Ecology 13, 219–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paré, P.W. & Tumlinson, J.H. (1999) Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores. Plant Physiology 121, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potvin, C. & Roff, D.A. (1993) Distribution-free and robust statistical methods: viable alternatives to parametric statistics. Ecology 74, 1617–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raja, N., Albert, S., Ignacimuthu, S. & Dorn, S. (2001) Effect of plant volatile oils in protecting stored cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walpers against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) infestation. Journal of Stored Products Research 37, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruther, J. & Steidle, J.L.M. (2000) Mites as matchmakers: semiochemicals from host-associated mites attract both sexes of the parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26, 1205–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabelis, M., Janssen, A., Pallini, A., Venzon, M., Bruin, J., Drukker, B. & Scutareanu, P. (1999) Behavioural responses of predatory and herbivorous arthropods to induced plant volatiles: from evolutionary ecology to agricultural applications, pp 269–296. in Agrawal, A.A., Tuzun, S. & Bent, E., (Eds) Induced plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores biochemistry, ecology and agriculture. St Paul, Minnesota: APS Press.Google Scholar
Schmale, I., Wäckers, F.L., Cardona, C. & Dorn, S. (2001) Control potential of three hymenopteran parasitoid species against the bean weevil in stored beans: the effect of adult parasitoid nutrition on longevity and progeny production. Biological Control 21, 134–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmale, I., Wäckers, F.L., Cardona, C. & Dorn, S. (2003) Combining parasitoids and plant resistance for the control of the bruchid weevil Acanthoscelides obtectus in stored beans. Journal of Stored Products Research 39, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steidle, J.L.M. (2000) Host recognition cues of the granary weevil parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 95, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steidle, J.L.M. & Fischer, A. (2000) Quantity does matter: how feces are used for host stage selection by granary weevil parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26, 2657–2664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steidle, J.L.M. & Ruther, J. (2000) Chemicals used for host recognition by the granary weevil parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26, 2665–2675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steidle, J.L.M. & Schöller, M. (1997) Olfactory host location and learning in the granary weevil parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus. Journal of Insect Behavior 3, 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, D.W. & Eller, F.J. (1990) Parasitic wasps orient to green leaf volatiles. Chemoecology 1, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Won, I.C. & Ryoo, M.I. (1994) Classifying instars of adzuki bean weevils (Bruchidae: Coleoptera) based on head capsule widths. Korean Journal of Entomology 24, 155–157.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1998) In Biostatistical analysis. pp 4th edn. London: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar