Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:11:01.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sex pheromone emission by female Stegobium paniceum (L.) (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) in relation to reproductive maturation and oviposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

B. I. P. Barratt
B. I. P. Barratt
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, U.K..
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract

Pheromone emission by female Stegobium paniceum (L.) was tested in the laboratory by measuring responses of males to filter paper discs that had been exposed to standardised air flow over females in a simple apparatus. Results indicated that although ether-extractable pheromone is present at eclosion, emission of pheromone is not appreciable until day 2 or 3 and does not reach a maximum until day 3 or 4. After mating, pheromone emission oscillates markedly for reasons not fully understood. Ovary maturation was monitored by dissection of females 0–5 days old; the first mature oocytes were found in the calyces on day 3. Synchrony between reproductive maturation and pheromone emission was thereby demonstrated. Copulatory behaviour and oviposition in relation to female mating history were studied. Virgin females produce a few infertile eggs during the latter part of their adult life; mated females produce far more, much earlier, but fecundity is reduced when a female is kept with another beetle, particularly a male. The significance of multiple mating was not ascertained since neither fecundity nor fertility was increased.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , September 1977 , pp. 491 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azab, A. K.. (1943). The factors affecting the rate of oviposition and development of Sitodrepa panicea L. (Coleoptera). —Ph.D. thesis, Univ. London.Google Scholar
Barratt, B. I. P.. (1974). Timing of production of a sex pheromone by females of Stegobium panicem (L.) (Coleoptera, Anobiidae) and factors affecting male response. —Bull. ent. Res. 64, 621–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonhag, P. F.. (1958). Ovarian structure and vitellogenesis in insects. —A. Rev. Ent. 3, 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, U. E.. & Smithwick, E. B.. (1968). Production and release of sex attractant by the female Indian-meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. — Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 61, 1260–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitsprecher, E. (1928). Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Anobiidensymbiose. — Z. Morph. OkoL Tiere. 11, 495–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, J.. (1937), Oviposition in certain Coleoptera. — Ann. appl. Biol. 24, 762–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Happ, G. M.. & Wheeler, J.. (1969). Bioassay, preliminary purification, and effect of age, crowding and mating on the release of sex pheromone by female Tenebrio molitor. — Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 62, 846–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. F.. & Thorp, K. D.. (1972). Influence of mating on attractiveness of female codling moths. —Envir. Ent. 1, 125–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janisch, E.. (1923). Zur Bekämpfungsbiologie des Brotkäfers, Sitodrepa panicea l. —Arb. biol. Reichsanst. Land-und Forstw. 12, 243–248.Google Scholar
Kamm, J. A.. & Richter, P. O.. (1972). Rapid dissection of insects to determine ovarial development. —Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 65, 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnavar, G. K.. (1972). Mating behaviour and fecundity in Trogoderma granarium (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). — J. stored Prod. Res. 8, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashef, A.. (1956). Étude biologique de Stegobium paniceum L. (Col. Anobiidae) et de son parasite: Lariophagus distinguendus Först. (Hym. Pteromalidae). — Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. 124, 5–88.Google Scholar
Lund, H. O.. (1938). Studies on longevity and productivity in Trichogramma evanescens. —J. agric. Res. 56, 421–439.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, M. E.. (1932). The structure and development of the reproductive system in the Coleoptera with notes on its homologies. —Q. J. microsc. Sci. 75, 49–129.Google Scholar
Monteiro, M. A. C.. (1957). Contribuicao para o estudo da morfologia de Stegobium paniceum (L.) (Coleoptera: Anobiidae).—Bolm. Soc. port. Cienci. nat. 7, 4–43.Google Scholar
Philipp, E.. (1968). Zur Kenntnis der Morphologie und Biologie von Trogoderma angustum Solier, 1849 (Coleoptera: Dermestidae).—Z. angew. Zool. 55, 193–256.Google Scholar
Sameoto, D. D.. & Miller, R. S.. (1966). Factors controlling the productivity of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.— Ecology. 47, 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlottman, L. L.. & Bonhag, P. F.. (1956). Histology of the ovary of the adult mealworm Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae).— Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 11, 351–394.Google Scholar
Shorey, H. H., McFarland, S. U.. & Gaston, L. K.. (1968). Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XIII. Changes in pheromone quantity, as related to reproductive age and mating history, in females of seven species of Noctuidae (Lepidoptera).— Ann. ent.Soc. Amer. 61, 372–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, G.. (1961). Spermathecal structure in some Coleoptera associated with stored products.— Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 36, 144–152.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B.. (1972). The principles of insect physiology. 7th ed., 827 pp. London, Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar