Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T17:38:25.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection of a BHC-resistant Strain of Drosophila melanogaster Mg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

F. J. Oppenoorth  and
D. Dresden
F. J. Oppenoorth
Affiliation:
Centre for Research on Biocides of the National Council for Agricultural Research, T.N.O., Utrecht.
D. Dresden
Affiliation:
Centre for Research on Biocides of the National Council for Agricultural Research, T.N.O., Utrecht.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two wild strains of Drosophila and one laboratory strain were selected for resistance to γBHC by a contact method. From each of these three strains equally resistant strains developed in about the same time. They did not become more resistant after prolonged selection. The resistance obtained was further investigated in one of the strains.

There was no evidence of any specificity: the susceptibility of the resistant insects to DDT and “Thanite” also appeared to be less than that of the original strains.

Although the strains were selected by a contact method they also showed decreased susceptiblity when the poison was applied to the skin and when it was injected. From the reciprocal crosses F1's were obtained the susceptibilities of which were practically the same and differed little from that of the resistant parent strain. It follows that resistance does not depend on cytoplasmatic heredity and that it is incompletely dominant.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , July 1953 , pp. 395 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blickle, R. L., Capelle, A. & Morse, W. J. (1948). Insecticide resistant house-flies.—Soap & sanit. Chein., 24, no. 8, p. 139.Google Scholar
Bruce, W. N. & Decker, G. C. (1950). House fly tolerance for insecticides.—Soap & sanit. Chem., 26, no. 3, p. 122.Google Scholar
Dresden, D. & Oppenoorth, F. J. (1953). Residual effect, skin application and injection of γ-hexachlorocyclohexane in Drosophila melanogaster.—Bull. ent. Res., 43, p. 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, A. W. & Wilson, H. G. (1948). Development of a strain of house-flies resistant to DDT.—Science, 107, p. 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, K. (1942). The balance of polygenic combinations.—J. Genet., 43, p. 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riemschneider, R. & Rohrmann, B. (1950). Über die Zucht DFDT-resistenter Drosophila melanogaster M.—Anz. Schädlingsk., 23, p. 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sismanidis, A. (1942). Selection for an almost invariable character in Drosophila.—J. Genet., 44, p. 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, R. & Crow, J. F. (1951). The resistance of DDT-resistant Drosophila to other insecticides.—Science, 113, p. 403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed