Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:39:45.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to conspecific and heterospecific semiochemicals by Sesamia nonagrioides (L.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) gravid females

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2015

D. Cruz  and
M. Eizaguirre
D. Cruz
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, Agrotecnio Center, University of Lleida, Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
M. Eizaguirre*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, Agrotecnio Center, University of Lleida, Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +34 973 702572 Fax: +34 973 238301 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Mediterranean corn borer, Sesamia nonagrioides, occurs sympatrically in the northeast of Spain with other lepidopteran pests such as Ostrinia nubilalis and Mythimna unipuncta. In this study, we evaluated the electrophysiological and behavioural response of mated and unmated females and males of S. nonagrioides to their own complete pheromone blend, to its own four components separately, and to the pheromone components of the sympatric species O. nubilalis and M. unipuncta. Results of the electroantennogram recordings revealed that females of S. nonagrioides can detect their own pheromone blend and its individual components. Moreover, our results show that unmated females and males of S. nonagrioides are more sensitive to the female pheromone, showing higher electrophysiological response than the mated females and males. Electroantennogram recordings showed that males and females can detect the major sexual pheromone component of O. nubilalis (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate and the minor component of the pheromone of M. unipuncta (Z)-9-hexadecenyl acetate. When the sex pheromone stimulus was presented in the dual-choice assays, gravid females of S. nonagrioides were attracted to both their own complete pheromone blend and one of their own minor pheromone components, (Z)-11-hexadecenal, but the major sexual pheromone component of O. nubilalis acts as a behavioural antagonist to the females.

Keywords

electroantennogramfemaleinter-intraspecific pheromones responseolfactometer
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 105 , Issue 3 , June 2015 , pp. 347 - 354
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acin, P., Carrascal, M., Abian, J., Guerrero, A. & Quero, C. (2009) Expression of differential antennal proteins in males and females of an important crop pest, Sesamia nonagrioides . Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 39, 11–19.Google Scholar
Albajes, R., Canela, R., Eizaguirre, M., Riba, M. & Guerrero, A. (1988) (Z)-9-tetradecen-1-ol an attractant for Athenis hospes Freyer. Mediateurs chimiques, comportement et systematique des Lepidopteres. Applications en agronomie. Les colloques de l'INRA 46, 55–58.Google Scholar
Barrozo, R.B., Gadenne, C. & Anton, S. (2010) Post-mating sexual abstinence in a male moth. Communicative and Integrative Biology 3, 629–630.Google Scholar
Binder, B.F., Robbins, J.C. & Wilson, R.L. (1995) Chemically mediated ovipositional behaviors of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, 1315–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brevault, T. & Quilici, S. (2010) Interaction between visual and olfactory cues during host finding in the tomato fruit fly Neoceratitis cyanescens . Journal of Chemical Ecology 36, 249–259.Google Scholar
Crnjar, R., Scalera, G., Liscia, A., Angioy, A.M., Bigiani, A., Pietra, P. & Barbarossa, I.T. (1989) Morphology and EAG mapping of the antennal olfactory receptors in Dacus oleae . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 51, 77–85.Google Scholar
De Cristofaro, A., Ioriatti, C., Pasqualini, E., Anfora, G., Germinara, G.S., Villa, M. & Rotundo, G. (2004) Electrophysiological responses of Cydia pomonella to codlemone and pear ester ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate: peripheral interactions in their perception and evidences for cells responding to both compounds. Bulletin of Insectology 57, 137–144.Google Scholar
Delury, N.C., Judd, G.J.R. & Gardiner, M.G.T. (2005) Antennal detection of sex pheromone by female Pandemis limitata (Robinson) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and its impact on their calling behaviour. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 102, 3–11.Google Scholar
Den Otter, C.J., De Cristofaro, A., Voskamp, K.E. & Rotundo, G. (1996) Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of chestnut moths, Cydia fagiglandana and C. splendana (Lep., Tortricidae), to sex attractants and odours of host plants. Journal of Applied Entomology 120, 413–421.Google Scholar
Eizaguirre, M. & Albajes, R. (1989) Present situation of arthropod pests in maize in the Northeast of Spain. Acta Phytopatologica et Entomologica Hungarica 24, 77–80.Google Scholar
Eizaguirre, M. & Albajes, R. (1992) Diapause induction in the stem corn borer, Sesamia nonagrioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomologia Generalis 17, 277–283.Google Scholar
Eizaguirre, M., Sans, A., Lopez, C. & Albajes, R. (2002) Effects of mating disruption against the Mediterranean corn borer, Sesamia nonagrioides, on the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis . IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 25, 59–68.Google Scholar
Eizaguirre, M., Albajes, R., Lopez, C., Sans, A. & Gemeno, C. (2007) Inhibition of pheromone response in Sesamia nonagrioides by the pheromone of the sympatric corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis . Pest Management Science 63, 608–614.Google Scholar
Eizaguirre, M., Lopez, C., Sans, A., Bosch, D. & Albajes, R. (2009) Response of Mythimna unipuncta males to components of the Sesamia nonagrioides pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology 35, 779–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finch, S. & Collier, R.H. (2000) Host-plant selection by insects – a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 96, 91–102.Google Scholar
Fischer, C.R. & King, B.H. (2012) Inhibition of male sexual behavior after interacting with a mated female. Behaviour 149, 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, B., & Thiery, D. (1994) Semiochemicals from Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) eggs deter oviposition by the codling moth Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). European Journal of Entomology 91, 353–359.Google Scholar
Gadenne, C., Dufour, M.C. & Anton, S. (2001) Transient post-mating inhibition of behavioural and central nervous responses to sex pheromone in an insect. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268, 1631–1635.Google Scholar
Gemeno, C., Sans, A., Lopez, C., Albajes, R. & Eizaguirre, M. (2006) Pheromone antagonism in the European corn borer moth Ostrinia nubilalis . Journal of Chemical Ecology 32, 1071–1084.Google Scholar
Giner, M., Sans, A., Riba, M., Bosch, D., Gago, R., Rayo, J., Rosell, G. & Guerrero, A. (2009) Development and biological activity of a new antagonist of the pheromone of the codling moth Cydia pomonella . Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57, 8514–8519.Google Scholar
Gökçe, A., Stelinski, L.L., Gut, L.J. & Whalon, M.E. (2007) Comparative behavioral and EAG responses of female obliquebanded and redbanded leafroller moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to their sex pheromone components. European Journal of Entomology 104, 187–194.Google Scholar
Groot, A.T., Gemeno, C., Brownie, C., Gould, F. & Schal, C. (2005) Male and female antennal responses in Heliothis virescens and H. subflexa to conspecific and heterospecific sex pheromone compounds. Environmental Entomology 32, 256–263.Google Scholar
Guerrero, A., Canela, R., Riba, M., Eizaguirre, M., Albajes, R. & Sarto, V. (1986) A sex attractant for males of the noctuid moth Athetis hospes . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 42, 97–100.Google Scholar
Guo, L. & Li, G. (2009) Olfactory perception of oviposition-deterring fatty acids and their methyl esters by the Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis . Journal of Insect Science 9, 67.Google Scholar
Harari, A.R., Zahavi, T. & Thiery, D. (2011) Fitness cost of pheromone production in signaling female moths. Evolution 65, 1572–1582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harmon, J.P., White, J.A. & Andow, D.A. (2003) Oviposition behavior of Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in response to potential intra- and interspecific interactions. Environmental Entomology 32, 334–339.Google Scholar
JMP, Version 8. (2008) SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Klun, J.A., Chapman, O.L., Mattes, K.C., Wojtkowski, P.W., Beroza, M. & Sonnet, P.E. (1973) Insect sex pheromones: minor amount of opposite geometrical isomer critical to attraction. Science 181, 661–663.Google Scholar
Konstantopoulou, M.A., Krokos, F.D. & Mazomenos, B.E. (2004) Chemical composition of corn leaf essential oils and their role in the oviposition behavior of Sesamia nonagrioides females. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30, 2243–2256.Google Scholar
Konstantopoulou, M.A., Pratsinis, H., Kletsas, D. & Mazomenos, B.E. (2006) Pheromone-binding protein and general odorant-binding protein of Sesamia nonagrioides: sex- and diel-dependent expression. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 119, 129–136.Google Scholar
Lelito, J.P., Myrick, A.J. & Baker, T.C. (2008) Interspecific pheromone plume interference among sympatric heliothine moths: a wind tunnel test using live, calling females. Journal of Chemical Ecology 34, 725–733.Google Scholar
Light, D.M. & Birch, M.C. (1979) Electrophysiological basis for the behavioural response of male and female Trichoplusia ni to synthetic female pheromone. Journal of Insect Physiology 25, 161–167.Google Scholar
Linn, C.E., Campbell, M.G. & Roelofs, W.L. (1987) Pheromone components and active space: what do moths smell and where they smell it? Science 237, 650–652.Google Scholar
Maïbeche-Coisne, M., Sobrio, F., Delaunay, T., Lettere, M., Dubroca, J., Jacquin-Joly, E. & Meillour, P.N.L. (1997) Pheromone binding proteins of the moth Mamestra brassicae: specificity of ligand binding. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 27, 213–221.Google Scholar
Martel, V., Anderson, P., Hansson, B.S. & Schlyter, F. (2009) Peripheral modulation of olfaction by physiological state in the Egyptian leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 55, 793–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, T. (1983) On the relationship between the electroantennogram and simultaneously recorded single sensillum response of the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis . Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 1, 85–91.Google Scholar
Ofomata, V.C., Overholt, W.A., Huis, A.V., Egwuatu, R.I. & Ngi-Song, A.J. (1999) Niche overlap and interspecific association between Chilo partellus and Chilo orichalcociliellus on the Kenya coast. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 93, 141–148.Google Scholar
Palaniswamy, P. & Seabrook, W.D. (1978) Behavioural responses of the female eastern spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to the sex pheromone of her own species. Journal of Chemical Ecology 4, 649–655.Google Scholar
Pearson, G.A. & Schal, C. (1999) Electroantennogram responses of both sexes of grape root borer (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) to synthetic female sex pheromone. Environmental Entomology 28, 943–946.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J. & Roitberg, B.D. (2001) Joining and avoidance behaviour in nonsocial insects. Annual Review of Entomology 46, 631–665.Google Scholar
Renwick, J.A.A. (1989) Chemical ecology of oviposition in phytophagous insects. Experientia 45, 223–228.Google Scholar
Ross, R.J., Palaniswamy, P. & Seabrook, W.D. (1979) Electroantennograms from spruce budworm moths (Choristoneura fumiferana) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) of different ages for various pheromone concentrations. The Canadian Entomologist 111, 807–816.Google Scholar
Sans, A., Riba, M., Eizaguirre, M. & Lopez, C. (1997) Electroantennogram, wind tunnel and field responses of male Mediterranean corn borer, Sesamia nonagrioides, to several blends of its sex pheromone components. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 82, 121–127.Google Scholar
Saveer, A.M., Kromann, S.H., Birgersson, G., Bengtsson, M., Lindblom, T., Balkenius, A., Hansson, B.S., Witzgall, P., Becher, P.G. & Ignell, R. (2012) Floral to green: mating switches moth olfactory coding and preference. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 279, 2314–2322.Google Scholar
Schneider, D., Lacher, V. & Kaissling, K.E. (1964) Die reaktionweise und das reaktiosspektrum von riechzellen bei Ahtherraea pernyi (Lepidoptera, Saturniidae). Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie 48, 632–662.Google Scholar
Schneider, D., Schulz, S., Priesner, E., Ziesmann, J. & Francke, W. (1998) Autodetection and chemistry of female and male pheromone in both sexes of the tiger moth Panaxia quadripunctaria . Journal of Comparative Physiology A 182, 152–161.Google Scholar
Seabrook, W.D., Linn, C.E., Dyer, L.J. & Shorey, H.H. (1987) Comparison of electroantennograms from female and male cabbage looper moths (Trichoplusia ni) of different ages and for various pheromone concentrations. Journal of Chemical Ecology 6, 1443–53.Google Scholar
Seenivasagan, T., Sharma, K.R., Sekhar, K., Ganesan, K., Prakash, S. & Vijayaraghavan, R. (2009) Electroantennogram, flight orientation, and oviposition responses of Aedes aegypti to the oviposition pheromone n-heneicosane. Parasitology Research 104, 827–833.Google Scholar
Stelinski, L.L., Il'ichev, A.L. & Gut, L.J. (2006) Antennal and behavioral responses of virgin and mated oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) females to their sex pheromone. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99, 898–904.Google Scholar
Stelinski, L.L., Holdcraft, R. & Rodriguez-Saona, C. (2014) Female moth calling and flight behavior are altered hours following pheromone autodetection: possible implications for practical management with mating disruption. Insects 5, 459–473.Google Scholar
Stephens, A.E.A., Suckling, D.M. & El-Sayed, A.M. (2008) Odour quality discrimination for behavioural antagonist compounds in three tortricid species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 127, 176–183.Google Scholar
Tamhankar, A.J., Rajendran, T.P., Rao, N.H., Lavekar, R.C., Jeyakumar, P., Monga, D. & Bambawale, O.M. (2003) Variability in response of Helicoverpa armigera males from different locations in India to varying blends of female sex pheromone suggests male sex pheromone response polymorphism. Current Science 84, 448–450.Google Scholar
Varshney, A.K., Babu, B.R., Singh, A.K., Agarwal, H.C. & Jain, S.C. (2003) Ovipositional responses of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to natural products from leaves of two maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51, 4008–4012.Google Scholar
Vickers, N.J. & Baker, T.C. (1991) The effects of unilateral antennectomy on the flight behavior of male Heliothis virescens in a pheromone plume. Physiological Entomology 16, 497–506.Google Scholar
Yang, M., Dong, S. & Chen, L. (2009) Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of female beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) to the conspecific female sex pheromone. Journal of Insect Behavior 22, 153–164.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical Analysis. 3rd edn. New Jersey, USA, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar