Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:12:40.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive efficiency of the bethylid wasp Cephalonomia tarsalis: the influences of spatial structure and host density

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2016

P.A. Eliopoulos ,
A. Kapranas ,
E.G. Givropoulou  and
I.C.W. Hardy
P.A. Eliopoulos*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Technologists, Technological Educational Institute of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
A. Kapranas
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Technologists, Technological Educational Institute of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK Department of Biology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland
E.G. Givropoulou
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Technologists, Technological Educational Institute of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
I.C.W. Hardy
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +302410684280 Fax: +302410613153 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The parasitoid wasp Cephalonomia tarsalis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) is commonly present in stored product facilities. While beneficial, it does not provide a high degree of biological pest control against its host, the saw-toothed beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Silvanidae). A candidate explanation for poor host population suppression is that adult females interfere with each other's foraging and reproductive behavior. We used simple laboratory microcosms to evaluate such mutual interference in terms of its overall effects on offspring production. We varied the density of the hosts and also the spatial structure of the environment, via the extent of population sub-division and the provision of different substrates. Production of C. tarsalis offspring was positively influenced by host density and by the isolation of females. With incomplete sub-division within microcosms offspring production was, in contrast, low and even zero. The provision of corrugated paper as a substrate enhanced offspring production and partially mitigated the effects of mutual interference. We recommend simple improvements to mass rearing practice and identify promising areas for further behavioral and chemical studies towards a better understanding of the mechanisms of mutual interference.

Keywords

mutual interferenceCephalonomia tarsalisOryzaephilus surinamensisstored productsbehavioural and chemical interactions
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 107 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 139 - 147
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbogast, R.T. & Throne, J.E. (1997) Insect infestation of farm-stored maize in South Carolina: towards characterization of a habitat. Journal of Stored Products Research 33, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asl, M.H.A., Talebi, A.A., Kamali, H. & Kazemi, S. (2009) Stored product pests and their parasitoid wasps in Mashhad, Iran. Advances in Environmental Biology 3, 239–243.Google Scholar
Batchelor, T.P., Hardy, I.C.W., Barrera, J.F. & Pérez-Lachaud, G. (2005) Insect gladiators II: competitive interactions within and between bethylid parasitoid species of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Biological Control 33, 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, T.P., Hardy, I.C.W. & Barrera, J.F. (2006) Interactions among bethylid parasitoid species attacking the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Biological Control 36, 106–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L., Howard, R.W., Campbell, J.F., Charlton, R.E., Nechols, J.R. & Ramaswamy, S. (2003) Behavioral interaction between males of Cephalonomia tarsalis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) competing for females. Journal of Insect Behaviour 16, 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L., Howard, R.W., Campbell, J.F., Charlton, R.E., Nechols, J.R. & Ramaswamy, S.B. (2004) Mating behavior of Cephalonomia tarsalis and the effect of female mating frequency on offspring production. Journal of Insect Behaviour 17, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collatz, J. & Steidle, J.L.M. (2008) Hunting for moving hosts: Cephalonomia tarsalis, a parasitoid of free-living grain beetles. Basic and Applied Ecology 9, 452–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collatz, J., Tolasch, T. & Steidle, J.L.M. (2009) Mate finding in the parasitic wasp Cephalonomia tarsalis (Ashmead): more than one way to a female's heart. Journal of Chemical Ecology 35, 761–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawley, M.J. (1993) GLIM for Ecologists. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
de Jong, P.W., Hemerik, L., Gort, G. & van Alphen, J.J.M. (2011) Rapid establishment of a regular distribution of adult tropical Drosophila parasitoids in a multi-patch environment by patch defence behaviour. PLoS ONE 6, e20870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driessen, G. & Visser, M.E. (1997) Components of parasitoid interference. Oikos 79, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliopoulos, P.A., Athanassiou, C.G. & Buchelos, C.T. (2002 a) Capture of hymenopterous parasitoids of stored-grain pests, in various trap types. pp. 76–82 in Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of Working Group 4 “Biocontrol of Arthropod Pests in Stored Products”, COST Action 842, 30–31 May 2002, Prague. Prague, Research Institute of Crop Production.Google Scholar
Eliopoulos, P.A., Athanassiou, C.G. & Buchelos, C.T. (2002 b) Occurrence of Hymeopterous parasitoids of stored product pests in Greece. IOBC Bulletin 25(3), 127–139.Google Scholar
Gómez, J., Barrera, J.F., Rojas, J.C., Macias-Samano, J., Liedo, J.P., Cruz-López, L. & Badii, M.H. (2005) Volatile compounds released by disturbed females of Cephalonomia stephanoderis, a bethylid parasitoid of the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei . Florida Entomologist 88, 180–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goubault, M., Mack, A.F.S. & Hardy, I.C.W. (2007) Encountering competitors reduces clutch size and increases offspring size in a parasitoid with female-female fighting. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274, 2571–2577.Google Scholar
Goubault, M., Batchelor, T.P., Romani, R., Linforth, R.S.T., Fritzsche, M., Francke, W. & Hardy, I.C.W. (2008) Volatile chemical release by bethylid wasps: identity, phylogeny, anatomy and behaviour. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 94, 837–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, D.M. & Poulson, T.L. (1993) Mechanisms and consequences of intraspecific competition in a carabid cave beetle. Ecology 74, 1373–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, I.C.W. & Goubault, M. (2007) Wasp fights: understanding and utilizing agonistic bethylid behaviour. Biocontrol News and Information 28, 11–15.Google Scholar
Hardy, I.C.W. & Mayhew, P.J. (1998) Sex ratio, sexual dimorphism and mating structure in bethylid wasps. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 42, 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M.P. (2000) The Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Host-parasitoid Interactions. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M.P. & May, R.M. (1973) Stability in insect host-parasite models. Journal of Animal Ecology 42, 693–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M.P. & May, R.M. (1989) The population biology of host-parasite and host-parasitoid associations. pp. 319–347 in Roughgarden, J., May, R.M. & Levin, S.A. (Eds) Perspectives in Ecological Theory. Princeton, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hötling, S., Haberlag, B., Tamm, M., Collatz, J., Mack, P., Steidle, J.L.M., Vences, M. & Schulz, S. (2014) Identification and synthesis of macrolide pheromones of the grain beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis and the frog Spinomantis aglavei . Chemistry 20, 3183–3191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, R.W. (1998) Ontogenetic, reproductive, and nutritional effects on the cuticular hydrocarbons of the host-specific ectoparasitoid Cephalonomia tarsalis (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R.W. & Baker, J.E. (2003) Morphology and chemistry of dufour glands in four ectoparasitoids: Cephalonomia tarsalis, C. waterstoni (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae), Anisopteromalus calandrae, and Pteromalus cereallae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B 135B, 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R.W. & Infante, F. (1996) Cuticular hydrocarbons of the host-specific ectoparasitoid Cephalonomia stephanoderis (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) and its host the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89, 700–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R.W. & Pérez-Lachaud, G. (2002) Cuticular hydrocarbons of the ectoparasitic wasp Cephalonomia hyalinipennis (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) and its alternative host, the stored product pest Caulophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 50, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, R.W., Charlton, M. & Charlton, R.E. (1998) Host-finding, host-recognition and host acceptance behavior of Cephalonomia tarsalis (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91, 879–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffaker, C. (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27, 343–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Infante, F., Mumford, J., Baker, P., Barrera, J. & Fowler, S. (2001) Interspecific competition between Cephalonomia stephanoderis and Prorops nasuta (Hym., Bethylidae), parasitoids of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Col., Scolytidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 125, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J.A., Valero, K.A., Hannel, M.M. & Gill, R.F. (2000) Seasonal occurrence of postharvest dried fruit insects and their parasitoids in a culled fig warehouse. Journal of Economic Entomology 93, 1380–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, N.A.C. & Jervis, M.A. (2005) Population dynamics. pp. 435–523 in Jervis, M.A. (Ed.) Insects as Natural Enemies: a Practical Perspective. Dordrecht, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latifian, M., Soleymannejadian, E., Ghazavy, M., Mosadegh, M.S. & Rad, B. (2011) Effect of the fungus, Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) (Asc., Hypocreales) on the functional response and host preference of the parasitoid Cephalonomia tarsalis (Ashmead) (Hym., Bethylidae) in larval population of the sawtoothed beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis L. (Col., Silvanidae). Journal of Entomological Research 3, 251–264.Google Scholar
Lord, J.C. (2001) Response of the wasp Cephalonomia tarsalis (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) to Beauveria bassiana (Hyphomycetes: Moniliales) as free conidia or infection in its host, the sawtoothed grain beetle, Oryzaephilus surinamensis (Coleoptera: Silvanidae). Biological Control 21, 300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, J.C. (2006) Interaction of Mattesia oryzaephili (Neogregarinorida: Lipotrophidae) with Cephalonomia spp. (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) and their hosts Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Laemophloeidae) and Oryzaephilus surinamensis (Coleoptera: Silvanidae). Biological Control 37, 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukáš, J. (2007) Age specific fecundity and survivorship of Cephalonomia tarsalis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) at different temperatures. “Integrated Protection of Stored Products” IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 30, 45–51.Google Scholar
Lukáš, J. (2008) Use of Cephalonomia tarsalis for the biological control of Oryzaephilus surinamensis . PhD Thesis, Prague Research Institute, Prague (In Czech).Google Scholar
Lukáš, J. & Stejskal, V. (2005) Cephalonomia tarsalis – egg, larval and pupal development in dependence on temperature. pp. 20–21 in Proceedings of COST 842 Meeting “Biocontrol of Arthropod Pests in Stored Products”, Barcelona, 27–31 October 2004.Google Scholar
Mayhew, P.J. (1997) Fitness consequences of ovicide in a parasitoid wasp. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 84, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, J. & Bernstein, C. (2002) The influence of local mate competition on host-parasitoid dynamics. Ecological Modelling 152, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunney, L. & Luck, R.F. (1988) Factors influencing the optimum sex ratio in a structured population. Theoretical Population Biology 33, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ode, P.J. & Hardy, I.C.W. (2008) Parasitoid sex ratios and biological control. pp. 253–291 in Wajnberg, E., Bernstein, C. & van Alphen, J.J.M. (Eds) Behavioral Ecology of Insect Parasitoids: from Theoretical Approaches to Field Applications. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Lachaud, G., Hardy, I.C.W. & Lachaud, J-P. (2002) Insect gladiators: competitive interactions between three species of bethylid wasps attacking the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Biological Control 25, 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Lachaud, G., Batchelor, T.P. & Hardy, I.C.W. (2004) Wasp eat wasp: facultative hyperparasitism and intra-guild predation by bethylid wasps. Biological Control 30, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, D. (1938) The biology of Cephalonomia tarsalis (Ash.), a vespoid wasp (Bethylidae: Hymenoptera) parasitic on the sawtoothed grain beetle. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 16, 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedlacek, J.D., Price, B.D., Sharkey, M.J., Hill, S.J. & Weston, P.A. (1998) Parasitoids found in on-farm shelled corn in Kentucky. Journal of Agricultural Entomology 15, 223–230.Google Scholar
Sreenivas, A.G. & Hardy, I.C.W. (2016) Mutual interference reduces offspring production in a brood guarding bethylid wasp. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 159, 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, M.E., van Alphen, J.J.M. & Nell, H.W. (1990) Adaptive superparasitism and patch time allocation in solitary parasitoids: the influence of the number of parasitoids depleting a patch. Behaviour 114, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K. & Hardy, I.C.W. (2002) Statistical analysis of sex ratios: an introduction. pp. 48–92 in Hardy, I.C.W. (Ed.) Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazdani, M. & Keller, M.A. (2015) Mutual interference in Dolichogenidea tasmanica (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) when foraging for patchily-distributed Light Brown Apple Moth. Biological Control 86, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žďărkovă, E., Lukáš, J. & Horăk, P. (2003) Compatibility of Cheyletus eruditus (Schrank) (Acari: Cheyletidae) and Cephalonomia tarsalis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) in biological control of stored grain pests. Plant Protection Science 39, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, O., Schöller, M. & Prozell, S. (2008) A new beneficial in storage protection: the use of the bethylid wasp Cephalonomia tarsalis against the sawtoothed grain beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis . DgaaE-Nachrichten 22, 46.Google Scholar
Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Walker, N.J., Saveliev, A.A. & Smith, G.M. (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. New York, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar