Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:08:51.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relative potency of insecticides to tsetse flies assessed by two methods*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. R. Busvine
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
U. Abdurrahim
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
N. N. Mohammed
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

Extract

The insecticidal Potencies of DDT, dieldrin, isobenzan, malathion, diazinon and arprocarb were assessed both by topical application of oil solutions to test insects any by exposing the latter to residues on glass, using young male and non-pregnant female adults of Glossina morsitans submorsitans Newst., G. austebi Newst., and Chrysomya putoria (Wied.).

By topical application, dieldrin and isobenzan were 10–23 times as potent as DDT, but their residues were on ly 2.2–6.3 times as effective; arprocarb was likewise more effective by topical application than as a residue, being, respectively, 9 and 3.5 times as effective as DDT. In contrast, diazinon, and, especially, malathion tended to be more efficient, relative to DDT, as residues than might be expected from application tests.

It is presumed that the difference between the ralative potency of an insecticide as a reesidue and as applied topically reflects the physical factors affecting contamination and penetration of the insect, but these matters have nor been stuided with tsetse flies.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldry, D. A. T. (1963). An evaluation by bioassay of the persistence of DDT deposits on riverine vegetation in the Northern Guinea Savannah vegetation zone of Nigeria and observations on the factors influencing the availability of deposits to Glossina palpalis (R. -D.).—Bull. ent. Res. 54 pp. 497508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldry, D. A. T. (1964). An assessment by bioassay of the comparative toxicity and persistence of dieldrin and isobenzan deposits on riverine vegetation in the Northern Guinea Savannah zone of Nigeria in relation to the control of Glossina palpalis (R. -D.).—Bull. ent. Res. 55 pp. 4952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, G. F. (1961 & 1962). The susceptibility of tsetse flies to topical application of insecticides. I. V.—Bull. ent. Res. 52 pp. 531539, 763768; 53 pp. 337–345, 347–354, 747–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busvine, J. R. (1962). A laboratory technique for measuring the susceptibility of houseflies and blowflies to insecticides.—Lab. Pract. 11 pp. 464468.Google Scholar
Busvine, J. R., Bell, J. D. & Guneidy, A. M. (1963). Toxicology and genetics of two types of insecticide resistance in Chrysomyia putoria (Wied.).—Bull. ent. Res. 54 pp. 589600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadaway, A. B. & Barlow, F. (1966). Relationships between some physical properties of insecticides and their intrinsic and contact toxicities to adult mosquitos (Anopheles stephensi List.).—Bull. ent. Res. 56 pp. 569579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kernaghan, R. J. & Johnston, M. R. L. (1962). A method of determining insecticide persistence in tsetse fly control operations.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 26 pp. 139141.Google ScholarPubMed
Kernaghan, R. J. & Nash, T. A. M. (1964). A technique for the dispatch of pupae of Glossina and other insects by air from the tropics.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 58 pp. 355358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, T. A. M., Kernaghan, R.J. & Boyle, J. A. (1966). The large-scale rearing of Glossina austeni in the laboratory I.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 60 pp. 3947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riordan, K. (1966). Relative persistence on vegetation in northern Nigeria of DDT deposits from two formulations.—Bull. ent. Res. 56 pp. 615621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar