Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:04:05.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationships between feeding habits and fecundity of Helopeltis theivora (Hemiptera: Miridae) on cocoa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. Muhamad*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, University of Agriculture, Selangor, Malaysia
M.J. Way
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Silwood Park, UK
*
Dr R. Muhamed, Department of Plant Protection, University of Agriculture, 43400 UPM Serdong, Malaysia

Abstract

The characteristics of feeding lesions and the relationship between cocoa pod size/age and surface area were determined as a basis for examining in detail the effects of pod age on feeding and oviposition by Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse. In no-choice and choice experiments in the field, adults made few feeding lesions on the youngest cherelles and, given a choice, made many fewer on full size, ripe yellowing pods than on old cherelles and growing pods. Old cherelles and growing pods were equally attractive based on numbers of feeding lesions per cherelle or pod, but in terms of available surface area for feeding there were more on the cherelles. These distinctions in feeding choice are even more striking for oviposition, with no eggs laid on young cherelles and old pods, and old cherelles/young pods strongly preferred on a per cherelle or pod basis, and especially per unit area of surface. It is suggested that the female chooses to oviposit on relatively old cherelles and young pods because its nymphs may benefit by feeding during a nutritious growing phase of pod development. It is also significant that eggs are rarely laid on ripe pods on which newly hatched nymphs cannot survive, nor are they laid on young cherelles, most of which, unlike the oldest, will die from cherelle wilt. The female lays a large proportion of eggs within, or very close to, feeding lesions, including those made earlier by males. Yet, this does not benefit egg viability. Males did not make feeding lesions on previously laid eggs.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Awang, A., Muhamad, R. & Khoo, K.C. (1988) Comparative merits of cocoa pod and shoot as food sources of the mirid, Helopeltis theobromae Miller. The Planter 64, 100104.Google Scholar
Entwhistle, P.F. (1972) Pests of cocoa. 779 pp. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Khoo, K.C. & Muhamad, R. (1986) Ecology of cocoa mirids. pp. 3840 in Proceedings of the Second International Conference in Plant Protection in the Tropics.Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Miller, N.C.E. (1941) Insects associated with cocoa (Theobroma cacao) in Malaya. Bulletin of Entomological Research 32, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhamad, R. (1992) Ecology and behavioral relationships between Helopeltis theobromae (Miridae) and its cocoa host plant. Ph D Thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of London.Google Scholar
Muhamad, R. & Khoo, K.C. (1983) A technique for rearing the cocoa mirid, Helopeltis theobromae Miller, in captivity. Newsletter Malaysian Plant Protection in the Tropics, Kuala Lampur, Malaysia, 310.Google Scholar
Muhamad, R. & Way, M.J. (1995) Damage and crop loss relationships of Helopeltis theivora, Hemiptera, Miridae and cocoa in Malaysia. Crop Protection. 14, 117121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, G.S. (1974) Helopeltis theivora theobromae on cocoa in Malaysia. II. Damage and Control. Malayam Agriculture Research 3, 204212.Google Scholar