Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:27:13.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship of the movements of aphids over the host-plant to their spatial distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

H. J. B. Lowe
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Trumpington, Cambridge

Extract

In both experimental and naturally developed colonies, Aphis fabae Scop., and Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) were concentrated on the upper parts of broad bean plants. A. pisum resembled Myzus persicae (Sulz.) rather than Aphis fabae by normally infesting leaves, not stems. Colonies of M. persicae were dispersed over the whole plant. In laboratory experiments, apterous adult aphids were observed walking on bean plants, and their activity was recorded in terms of their actions at each node. Moving aphids of both species tended to maintain their direction at a node although the structure of the plant does not appear to favour this. Aphids of both species changed their direction of movement more often after going onto the leaf at a node than when they stayed on the stem. M. persicae adults went upwards as often as they went down, but those of Acyrthosiphon pisum walked up more often than down and were more likely to turn round if they were moving downwards. These differences in the behaviour of active individuals would tend to produce the differences between the observed spatial distributions of the two species, although other factors, including leaf age and reproductive rates are probably more important in determining the form of aphid colonies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, C. J. (1958). Effects of the ant, Lasius niger L. on the behaviour and reproduction of the black bean aphid Aphis fabae Scop.—Bull. ent. Res. 49, 701714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Emden, H. F. (1969). The differing reactions of Brevicoryne and Myzus to leaf age, turgidity and soluble nitrogen in brassicas.—Ann. appl. Biol. 63, 324325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, R. (1964). Some observations on Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) and Aphis fabae Scop, colonizing sweet peas.—Entomologia exp. appl. 7, 195204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibbotson, A. & Kennedy, J. S. (1959). Interaction between walking and probing in Aphis fabae Scop.—J. exp. Biol. 36, 377390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. S., Ibbotson, A. & Booth, C. O. (1950). The distribution of aphid infestation in relation to leaf age: I Myzus persicae (Sulz.) and Aphis fabae Scop, on spindle trees and sugar-beet plants.—Ann. appl. Biol. 37, 651696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, H. J. B. (1965). Studies on spatial distribution in aphid colonies.—Ph.D. Thesis, 459 pp. Univ. London.Google Scholar
Wyatt, I. J. (1969). Factors affecting aphid infestation of chrysanthemums.—Ann. appl. Biol. 63, 331337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar