Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:56:16.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between light- and suction-trap catches of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), and the adjustment of light-trap catches to allow for variation in moonlight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

John Bowden
John Bowden
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of catches of Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) in a light-trap and a suction trap at Rothamsted, southern England, showed that the light-trap catch varied as predicted from a model proposed to describe the functioning of a light-trap: catch = constant × , where W = trap illumination and I = background illumination. After adjustment to allow for changes in illumination during the flight period of C. carnea, the light-trap catch was very similar to the suction-trap catch. For C. carnea, a light-trap provides as unbiased a sample as a suction trap, but because of variation in trap effectiveness with variation in illumination, light-trap catches obscure changes in activity and abundance. Although similar studies are desirable to confirm this for other species, it is suggested that in light-trap studies catches should be adjusted to allow for changes in illumination during flight or trapping periods.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 621 - 629
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, R. H., Phillips, B. F. & Webb, D. J. (1976). A method for calculating moonlight illuminance at the earth's surface.—J. appl. Ecol. 13, 741–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, E. (1976). Forecasting infestations of tropical migrant pests: the desert locust and the African army worm.—pp. 113–134 in Rainey, R. C. (Ed.). Insect flight.—287 pp. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific (Symp. R. ent. Soc. Lond. no. 7).Google Scholar
Bidlingmayer, W. L. (1964). The effect of moonlight on the flight activity of mosquitoes.—Ecology 45, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidlingmayer, W. L. (1967). A comparison of trapping methods for adult mosquitoes: species response and environmental influence.—J. med. Entomol. 4, 200–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowden, J. (1973). The influence of moonlight on catches of insects in light-traps in Africa. Part I. The moon and moonlight.—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 113–128.Google Scholar
Bowden, J. (1979). Photoperiod, dormancy and the end of flight activity in Chrysopa carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 69, 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, J. & Church, B. M. (1973). The influence of moonlight on catches of insects in light-traps in Africa. Part II. The effect of moon phase on light-trap catches.—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 129–142.Google Scholar
Bowden, J. & Jones, M. G. (1979). Monitoring wheat bulb fly, Delia coarctata (Fallén) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), with light-traps.—Bull. ent. Res. 69, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, J. & Morris, M. G. (1975). The influence of moonlight on catches of insects in light-traps in Africa. III. The effective radius of a mercury-vapour light-trap and the analysis of catches using effective radius.—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 303–348.Google Scholar
Davies, J. B. (1975). Moonlight and the biting activity of Culex (Melanoconion) portesi Senevet & Abonnenc and C. (M.) taeniopus D. & K. (Diptera, Culicidae) in Trinidad forests.—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 81–96.Google Scholar
Duelli, P. (1980). Adaptive dispersal and appetitive flight in the green lacewing, Chrysopa carnea.—Ecol. Entomol 5, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, P. A. (1939). The distribution of insects, spiders, and mites in the air.—Tech. Bull. US. Dep. Agric. no. 673, 150 pp.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. & Taylor, L. R. (1965). Diurnal periodicity of flight by insects.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 116, 393–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. & Palmer, J. M. P. (1972). Aerial sampling.—pp. 189–234 in van Emden, H. F. (Ed.). Aphid technology.—344 pp. London & New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1936). The influence of moonlight on the activity of certain nocturnal insects, particularly of the family Noctuidae, as indicated by a light trap.—Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 226, 357–389.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1948). The Rothamsted light trap.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 23 80–85.Google Scholar