Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:04:37.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Readjustment of the malaria vector control strategy in the Rusizi Valley, Burundi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. Smits
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Medical Entomology, Prins Leopold Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde, Antwerpen, Belgium
M. Coosemans*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Medical Entomology, Prins Leopold Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde, Antwerpen, Belgium
W. Van Bortel
Affiliation:
Programme National de Lutte Antipaludique, Bujumbura, Burundi
M. Barutwanayo
Affiliation:
Programme National de Lutte Antipaludique, Bujumbura, Burundi
Ch. Delacollette
Affiliation:
Programme National de Lutte Antipaludique, Bujumbura, Burundi
*
M. Coosemans, Laboratory of Medical Entomology, Prins Leopold Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde, 155 Nationalestraat, B-200 Antwerpen, Belgium.

Abstract

Based on a longitudinal survey performed in 1982–1983, a vector control strategy was implemented from 1985 onwards in a malarial-dense area of Burundi. One annual round of indoor spraying with malathion greatly reduced both the parasite load and the parasite rate in the population until 1989. However, from 1990 to 1993, a progressive resurgence of malaria was observed in most villages. For the present study, two villages were selected on the basis of their differential response to house spraying. In the village of Mulira surrounded by rice fields, the excellent results observed in the past have been followed by recent increases in parasite rates. In the village of Murengeza, also located in the rice growing area but near a river, the spraying had less impact. The inoculation rate was found to be similar in both villages, but the transmission peak occurred at the end of April in Mulira, and two months earlier in Murengeza. Indoor spraying with lambdacyhalothrin was carried out on 26 April 1993, one month too late according to the strategy intended. As no sporozoite mosquitoes were observed during the six months following spraying, this strategy should be maintained but, in villages near rivers, the application should commence much earlier, in mid-January. Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto (Diptera: Culicidae) and A. funestus Giles were found to be very endophilic species, whereas the dominant A. arabiensis. Patton was highly exophilic. Therefore it is recommended that treatments should not only be applied to human dwellings but also to other structures such as animal sheds, kitchens, etc, shown by earlier studies to be resting sites of A. arabiensis. This study underlines the need for regular reassessment in vector control programmes.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barutwanayo, M., Coosemans, M., Delacolette, Ch., Bisore, S., Mpitabakana, P. & Seruzingo, D. (1991) La lutte contre les vecteurs du paludisme dans le cadre d'un projet de développement rural au Burundi. Annales de la Société Belge de Médecine Tropicale 71 Suppl. 1, 113125.Google Scholar
Beier, J., Perkins, P., Wirtz, R., Koros, J., Diggs, D., Gargan, T. & Koech, D. (1988) Bloodmeal identification by direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), tested on Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) in Kenya. Journal of Medical Entomology 25, 916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullini, L. (1984) Enzyme variants in the identification of parasites and vectors: methodological aspects of the electrophoretic approach. pp. 5369in Newton, B.N. & Michal, F. (Eds) New approach to the identification of parasites and their vectors. Tropical Diseases Research World Health Organization ser 5.Google Scholar
Burkot, T.R., Williams, J.L. & Schneider, I. (1984) Identification of Plasmodium falciparum-infected mosquitoes by a double anti-body enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 33, 783788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coosemans, M. (1985) Comparaison de l'endémie malarienne dans une zone de riziculture et dans une zone de culture de coton dans la Plaine de la Rusizi (Burundi). Annales de la Société Belge de Médecine Tropicale 65, Suppl. 2, 187200.Google Scholar
Coosemans, M. & Barutwanayo, M. (1989) Malaria control by antivectorial measures in a chloroquino-resistant area: a successful experience in a rice-growing area of the Rusizi Valley (Burundi). Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 83, Suppl., 9798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coosemans, M., Petrarca, V., Barutwanayo, M. & Coluzzi, M. (1989) Species of the Anopheles gambiae complex and chromosomal polymorphism in a rice growing area of the Rusizi Valley (Republic of Burundi). Parassitologia 31, 113122.Google Scholar
Coosemans, M., Van der Stuyft, P. & Delacollette, Ch. (1994) Hundred percent of fields positive in a thick film, a useful indicator of relative changes in morbidity in areas with seasonal malaria. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 88, 581586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delacollette, Ch. & Van der Stuyft, P. (1993) High parasitaemia incidence rate can be used to estimate malaria morbidity rates. Annales of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 87, 537539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, S.J. (1978) A biochemical key to adult member of the group of species (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 15, 297299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molineaux, L., Shidrawi, G.R., Clarke, J.L., Boulzaguet, R., Ashkar, T. & Dietz, K. (1976) The impact of propoxur on Anopheles gambiae s.l. and some other anopheline populations, and its relationship with some pre-spraying variables. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 54, 379389.Google ScholarPubMed
White, G.B., Magayuka, S.A. & Boreham, P.F.L. (1972) Comparative studies on sibling species of the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex (Dipt., Culicidae): bionomics and vectorial activity of species A and species B at Segera, Tanzania. Bulletin of Entomological Research 62, 295317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar