Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:49:18.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Random mating and reproductive compatibility among Argentinean and southern Brazilian populations of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2012

J. Rull ,
S. Abraham ,
A. Kovaleski ,
D.F. Segura ,
A. Islam ,
V. Wornoayporn ,
T. Dammalage ,
U. Santo Tomas  and
M.T. Vera
J. Rull*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Apartado Postal 63, 91000 Xalapa, Veracruz, México
S. Abraham
Affiliation:
Cátedra de Terapéutica Vegetal, Departamento de Sanidad Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia, UNT, Tucumán, Argentina Comisión Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), CABA, Argentina
A. Kovaleski
Affiliation:
Embrapa Uva e Vinho, Estação Experimental de Vacaria, Vacaria, Brazil Insect Pest Control Laboratory, FAO/IAEA Agriculture and Biotechnology Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria
D.F. Segura
Affiliation:
Comisión Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), CABA, Argentina Instituto de Genética ‘E.A. Favret’, INTA Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
A. Islam
Affiliation:
Insect Pest Control Laboratory, FAO/IAEA Agriculture and Biotechnology Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria
V. Wornoayporn
Affiliation:
Insect Pest Control Laboratory, FAO/IAEA Agriculture and Biotechnology Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria
T. Dammalage
Affiliation:
Insect Pest Control Laboratory, FAO/IAEA Agriculture and Biotechnology Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria
U. Santo Tomas
Affiliation:
Insect Pest Control Laboratory, FAO/IAEA Agriculture and Biotechnology Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria
M.T. Vera
Affiliation:
Cátedra de Terapéutica Vegetal, Departamento de Sanidad Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia, UNT, Tucumán, Argentina Comisión Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), CABA, Argentina
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +86-10-58807721 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As a prerequisite for area-wide application of the sterile insect technique in an area encompassing northern Argentina and southern Brazil, prezygotic and postzygotic reproductive compatibility among three geographically distant populations in the area was tested. In field cages, sexually mature adults of each population were found to be sexually compatible, mating duration was not affected by fly origin and there was no clear evidence of spatial partition of mating location. In the laboratory, homotypic and heterotypic crosses for all possible combinations displayed similar levels of fertility and yielded F1 adults without distortion of the sex ratio. Finally, F1 hybrid and parental adults produced equally viable F2 eggs. Put together, our results and those from earlier studies suggest that a large area, ranging from Buenos Aires to the surroundings of São Paulo, could be managed using a single A. fraterculus mass-reared strain. At the northern margin of this area, two A. fraterculus morphotypes appear to coexist in sympatry. We delineate future research to further delimit the distribution of the aff1 morphotype (Argentina-southern Brazil) and to gain insight into evolutionary patterns producing divergence and radiation of tropical fruit fly species.

Keywords

Anastrepha fraterculuscryptic speciesreproductive compatibilitysterile insect techniquearea-wide
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 102 , Issue 4 , August 2012 , pp. 435 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, A.C., Rodriguero, M.S., Cendra, P.G., Saidman, B.O. & Vilardi, J.C. (2002) Evidence indicating that Argentine populations of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) belong to a single biological species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95, 505–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allinghi, A., Gramajo, M.C., Willink, E. & Vilardi, J.C. (2007) Induction of sterility in Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) by gamma radiation. Florida Entomologist 90, 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aluja, M., Perez-Staples, D., Macias-Ordoñez, R., Piñero, J., McPheron, B. & Hernández-Ortiz, V. (2003) Nonhost status of Citrus sinensis cultivar Valencia and C. paradisi cultivar Ruby Red to Mexican Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 1693–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basso, A., Sonvico, A., Quesada-Allue, L. & Manso, F. (2003) Karyotipic and molecular identification of laboratory stocks of the South American fruit fly Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 1237–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cáceres, C., Segura, D.F., Vera, M.T., Wornoayporn, V., Cladera, J.L., Teal, P., Sapountzis, P., Bourtzis, K., Zacharopoulou, A. & Robinson, A.S. (2009) Incipient speciation revealed in Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) by studies on mating compatibility, sex pheromones, hybridisation and cytology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 97, 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cayol, J.P., Vilardi, J.C., Rial, E. & Vera, M.T. (1999) New indices and methods to measure the sexual compatibility and mating performance of medfly (Diptera: Tephritidae) laboratory reared strains under field cage conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology 92, 140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A.R., Armstrong, K.F., Carmichael, A.E., Milne, J.R., Raghu, S., Roderick, G.K. & Yeates, D.K. (2004) Invasive phytophagous pests arising through recent tropical evolutionary radiation: the Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 50, 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lima, I.S., Howse, P.E. & Salles, L.A.B. (1994) Reproductive behavior of the South American fruit fly Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae): laboratory and field studies. Physiological Entomology 19, 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Longo, O., Colombo, A., Gómez-Riera, P. & Bartolucci, A. (2000) The use of massive SIT for the control of the medfly, Ceratitis capitata (Wied.), strain SEIB 6–96, in Mendoza, Argentina. pp. 351–359in Tan, K.H. (Ed.) Area-Wide Management of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests. Penang, Malaysia, Universiti Sains Malaysia Press.Google Scholar
FAO/IAEA/USDA (2003) Manual for product quality control and shipping procedures for sterile mass-reared Tephritid fruit flies. Version 5. Vienna, Austria, International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Guillén, D. & Sánchez, R. (2005) Expansion of the national fruit fly control programme in Argentina. pp. 653–660in Vreysen, M.J.B., Robinson, A.S. & Hendrichs, J. (Eds) Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests: From Research to Field Implementation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer.Google Scholar
Hernández-Ortiz, V., Gómez-Anaya, J.A., Sánchez, A., McPheron, B.A. & Aluja, M. (2004) Morphometric analysis of Mexican and South American populations of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex (Diptera: Tephritidae) and recognition of a distinct Mexican morphotype. Bulletin of Entomological Research 94, 487–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaldo, H.E., Gramajo, M.C. & Willink, E. (2001) Mass rearing of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae): a preliminary strategy. The Florida Entomologist 84, 716–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malavasi, A. & Nascimento, A.S. (2003) Programa biofábrica Moscamed Brasil. p. 52 in Simpósio de Controle Biológico. 8, Resumos. Águas de São Pedro, SEB, 2003. Águas de São Pedro, Brazil.Google Scholar
Morgante, J.S., Malavasi, A. & Bush, G.L. (1980) Biochemical systematics and evolutionary relationships of neotropical Anastrepha. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 73, 622–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oroño, L.E., Albornoz-Medina, P., Núñez-Campero, S., Van Nieuwenhove, G.A., Bezdjian, L.P., Martin, C.B., Schliserman, P. & Ovruski, S.M. (2008) Update of host plant list of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata in Argentina. pp. 207–225 in Fruit Flies of Economic Importance: From Basic to Applied Knowledge. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Fruit Flies of Economic Importance. 10–15 September 2006, Salvador, Brazil.Google Scholar
Petit-Marty, N., Vera, M.T., Calcagno, G., Cladera, J.L., Segura, D.F., Allinghi, A., Rodriguero, M., Gómez Cendra, P., Viscarret, M.M. & Vilardi, J.C. (2004a) Sexual behavior and mating compatibility among four populations of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Argentina. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97, 1320–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit-Marty, N., Vera, M.T., Calcagno, G., Cladera, J.L. & Vilardi, J.C. (2004b) Lack of post-mating isolation between two populations of Anastrepha fraterculus from different ecological regions in Argentina. pp. 79–82in Barnes, B.N. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on fruit flies of economic importance. 6–10 May 2004, Stellenbosch, South Africa.Google Scholar
Prezotto, L.F. (2008) Analise do ITS1 do DNA ribossomico em species do complexo Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Disertacao (Maestrado). Instituto de Biociencias de Universidade de Sao Paulo. Departamaento de Genetica e Biologia Evolutiva.Google Scholar
Richardson, R.H., Ellison, J.R. & Averhoff, W.W. (1982) Autocidal control of screwworms in North America. Science 215, 361–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sánchez-Santillán, N. & Garduño, R. (2008) Algunas consideraciones sobre los sistemas de clasificación climática. ContactoS 68, 5–10.Google Scholar
Segura, D.F., Utgés, M.E., Liendo, M.C., Rodríguez, M.F., Devescovi, F., Vera, M.T., Teal, P.E.A. & Cladera, J.L. (2010) Methoprene treatment reduces the pre-copulatory period in Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) sterile males. Journal of Applied Entomology. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2010.01534.x.Google Scholar
Segura, D.F., Vera, M.T., Rull, J., Wornoayporn, V., Islam, A. & Robinson, A.S. (2011) Assortative mating among Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) hybrids from two distinct populations as a possible route to radiation of the fraterculus cryptic species group. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 102, 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selivon, D., Morgante, J.S. & Perondini, A.L.P. (1997) Egg size, yolk mass extrusion and hatching behavior in two cryptic species of Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann)(Diptera: Tephritidae). Brazilian Journal of Genetics 20, 587–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selivon, D., Perondini, A.L.P. & Morgante, J.S. (1999) Haldane's rule and other aspects of reproductive isolation observed in the Anastrepha fraterculus complex (Diptera: Tephritidae). Genetics and Molecular Biology 22, 507–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selivon, D., Perondini, A.L.P. & Morgante, J.S. (2005) A genetic-morphological characterization of two cryptic species of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 98, 367–381.Google Scholar
Smith-Caldas, M.R.B., McPheron, B.A., Silva, J.G. & Zucchi, R.A. (2001) Phylogenetic relationships among species of the fraterculus group (Anastrepha: Diptera: Tephritidae) inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1. Neotropical Entomology 30, 565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, A. (1942) The fruit flies of the genus Anastrepha. Washington, DC, US Department of Agriculture (USDA. Misc. Publ. 439, 112p).Google Scholar
Steck, G.J. (1991) Biochemical systematics and population genetic structure of Anastrepha fraterculus and related species (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 84, 10–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steck, G.J. & Sheppard, W.S. (1993) Mitochondrial DNA variation in Anastrepha fraterculus, pp. 9–14in Aluja, M. & Liedo, P. (Eds) Fruit Flies Biology and Management. New York, NY, USA, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, N., Okamoto, R. & Chambers, D.L. (1970) Methods of mass rearing the Mediterranean fruit fly currently used by the United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 19–23 in The Proceedings on the Sterile Male Techniques for Control of Fruit Flies. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1–5 September 1969, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Thomas, D.B. & Loera-Gallardo, J. (1998) Dispersal and longevity of mass-released, sterilized Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environmental Entomology 27, 1045–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vera, M.T., Cáceres, C., Wornoayporn, V., Islam, A., Robinson, A.S., de la Vega, M.H., Hendrichs, J. & Cayol, J.P. (2006) Mating incompatibility among populations of the South American fruit fly Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99, 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vera, M.T., Abraham, S., Oviedo, M.A. & Willink, E. (2007) Demographic and quality control parameters of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) maintained under artificial rearing. Florida Entomologist 90, 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vreysen, M.J.B., Robinson, A.S. & Hendrichs, J. (2007) Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests: From Research to Field Implementation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, C. & Meats, A. (2010) Dispersal of mass-reared sterile, laboratory-domesticated and wild male Queensland fruit flies. Journal of Applied Entomology 134, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar