Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:40:28.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The productivity of grasslands in England for Oscinella frit (L.) (Chloropidae) and other stem-boring Diptera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

T. R. E. Southwood
Affiliation:
Imperial College, London, S.W.7.
W. F. Jepson
Affiliation:
Imperial College, London, S.W.7.

Extract

Dissections of over 93,000 grass stems obtained by random core-sampling of natural grasslands at a site in Berkshire largely confirm earlier conclusions regarding the associations of different species of dipterous stem borers and grasses. Allowing for the number of stems of each grass species per unit area, the densities of larvae were greatest in Anthoxanum odoratum, Poa and Lolium and lowest in Dactylis glomerata. Oscinella frit (L.) was less abundant than Cetema spp. and Opomyza germinationis (L.); it was not found in D. glomerata but was most abundant in Lolium and Festuca. Sampling showed that overwintering larvae of O. frit suffer at least 50 per cent, mortality between September–December and January–March.

Previous studies have largely concentrated on populations in different species of grasses, but it is advantageous to consider the production of O. frit in terms of short (grazed or regularly mown) grasslands and long grasslands (hay fields, uncut commons and rough grazing); comparisons of figures obtained by core-sampling for larvae and emergence traps for adults indicate a production from short grassland and long grassland of about 11 and under 1 overwintered adult per sq. yd., respectively. Having regard to the greater productivity of common leys, dominated by Lolium and Poa, a national average for the first figure would be 15. There is little increase from generation to generation in grassland populations during the year, in contrast with the situation in oats.

From tentative estimates of the acreages and productivities of the different sources of O. frit in England and Wales as a whole, it is clear that the majority of the adults of O. frit are produced by grasslands in the spring and summer and by the oat panicles in the autumn, the latter population being much the greater. As O. frit is a migratory insect, such a conclusion is especially significant and indicates that during the autumn the ‘ population pressure ’ in the grasslands will be very different to that during other seasons.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Choyce, M. A. (1952). Investigations on the frit fly, 1952.—D. I. C. thesis, Imp. Coll.Google Scholar
Coaker, T. H. (1953). Investigations on the frit fly, 1953.—D. I. C. thesis, Imp. Coll.Google Scholar
Collin, J. E. (1946). The British genera and species of Oscinellinae (Diptera. Chloropidae).—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 97 pp. 117148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, N. (1923). On the relative importance of certain common grasses as host plants of Oscinella frit, Linn.—Ann. appl. Biol. 10 pp. 210212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemer, M. (1959). Zur Biologie, wirtschaftlichen Bedeutung und Bekämpfung der Fritfliege (Oscinis frit L.) an Gerste. I. Teil.—Z. angew. Ent. 44 pp. 314339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemer, M. (1960). Zur Biologie, wirtschaftlichen Bedeutung und Bekämpfung der Fritfliege (Oscinis frit L.) an Gerste. II. Teil.— Z. angew. Ent. 46 pp. 71119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepson, W. F. & Heard, A. J. (1959). The frit fly and allied stem-boring Diptera in winter wheat and host grasses.—Ann. appl. Biol. 47 pp. 114130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepson, W. F. & Southwood, T. R. E. (1958). Population studies on Oscinella frit L.—Ann. appl. Biol. 46 pp. 465474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G., Taylor, L. R. & Southwood, T. R. E. (1962). High altitude migration of Oscinella frit L. (Diptera: Chloropidae).— J. Anim. Ecol. 31 pp. 373383.Google Scholar
Le Berre, J. R. (1959). Études entreprises sur les Oscinies, dans le cadre des recherches relatives aux immunités végétales à l'égard des insectes.— Meded. LandbHogesch. Gent 24 pp. 593610.Google Scholar
Narchuk, É. P. (1956). Species of the genus Oscinella Beck. (Diptera, Chloropidae) of the European part of the U.S.S.R. and their food plants. [In Russian.[Rev. Ent. URSS 35 pp. 856882.Google Scholar
Narchuk, É. P. (1959). Notes of frit flies (Diptera, Chloropidae) in the Oka Bottomland. [In Russian with English summary.]Zool. Zh. 38 pp. 12641267.Google Scholar
Nye, I. W. B. (1958). The external morphology of some of the Dipterous larvae living in the Gramineae of Britain.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 110 pp. 411487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, I. W. B. (1959). The distribution of shoot-fly larvae (Diptera, Acalypterae) within pasture grasses and cereals in England.—Bull. ent. Res. 50 pp. 5362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. & Jepson, W. F. (in press). Studies on the populations of Oscinella frit L. (Diptera: Chloropidae) in the oatcrop.—J. Anim. Ecol. 31 pt. 3.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E., Jepson, W. F. & Van Emden, H. F. (1961). Studies on the behaviour of Oscinella frit L. (Diptera) adults of the panicle generation.—Ent. exp. appl. 4 pp. 196210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, A. H. (1958). Frit-fly attack and yield of oats.—Ann. appl. Biol. 46 pp. 486493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, A. H. (1961). Ecological problems in crop pest control. In Wood, R. K. S. Ed. Biological problems arising from the control of pests and diseases. London, Inst. Biol.Google Scholar
Van Emden, H. F., Jepson, W. F. & Southwood, T. R. E. (1961). The occurrence of a partial fourth generation of Oscinella frit L. (Diptera: Chloropidae) in southern England.—Ent. exp. appl. 4 pp. 220225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasina, A. N. (1929). On the occurrence of Oscinella frit L. on wild grasses. [In Russian.]Pl Prot., Leningr. 6 pp. 6370. (Abstr. in Rev. appl. Ent. (A) 19 p. 286.)Google Scholar