Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:34:33.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prediction of outbreaks of coffee leaf-miners on Kilimanjaro

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. Bigger
Affiliation:
Coffee Research Station, Lyamungu, Tanzania
R. G. Tapley
Affiliation:
Coffee Research Station, Lyamungu, Tanzania

Extract

Analysis of the results obtained from suction-trap catches of the coffee leaf-miners, Leucoptera meyricki Ghesq. and L. caffeina Wshbn. on an unsprayed block of coffee at the Coffee Eesearch Station, Lyamungu, on the slopes of Kilimanjaro, are given.

By thermal summation methods it was possible to delimit successive generations of moths with some degree of accuracy and the generation catches were used for regression analysis with various meteorological factors. With L. meyricki, a negative correlation was shown between the rate of increase from one generation to the next and with both maximum and mean daily temperature, solar radiation and duration of sunshine taken as means over the period of each generation. In each case, the highest degree of correlation was found between the meteorological data in one generation and the rate of increase in the next.

When the generation catches were plotted on a logarithmic scale it was found that linear regression lines could be fitted to the periods of both rise and fall of the annual outbreak. With L. meyricki, the rate of increase of the rise was negatively correlated with, and the rate of decrease of the fall positively correlated with, the size of the generation present at the beginning of the outbreak. It is therefore possible, knowing the size of the minimum generation, to predict the size of the coming outbreak. No such relationship could be proved with L. caffeina, probably because the catches of the key generations were very small, but when the catches of the two species were pooled the same relationship held. It is probable that parasites are the main factor governing the annual fluctuations.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balch, R. E. & Bird, F. T. (1944). A disease of the European spruce sawfly, Gilpinia hercyniae (Htg.), and its place in natural control.—Scient. Agric. 25 pp. 6580.Google Scholar
Bess, H. A. (1964). Populations of the leaf-miner Leucoptera meyricki Ghesq. and its parasites in sprayed and unsprayed coffee in Kenya.—Bull. ent. Res. 55 pp. 5982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigger, M. (1967). Pest profiles II—leaf miners.—Tanganyika Coff. News 7 pp. 149155.Google Scholar
Box, H. E. (1923). The bionomics of the white coffee-leaf miner, Leucoptera coffeella, Guer., in Kenya Colony (Lepidoptera, Lyonetiidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 14 pp. 133145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, T. J. (1964). Coffee leaf miners in Kenya.—Kenya Coff. 29 no. 341 pp. 173183; no. 342 pp. 223231; no. 343 pp. 261273.Google Scholar
Notley, F. B. (1948). The Leucoptera leaf miners of coffee on Kilimanjaro. I.—Leucoptera coffeella, Guér.—Bull. ent. Res. 39 pp. 399416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Notley, F. B. (1956). The Leucoptera leaf miners of coffee on Kilimanjaro. II.—Leucoptera caffeina Wshbn.—Bull. ent. Res. 46 pp. 899912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapley, R. G. (1961). Coffee leaf-miner epidemics in relation to the use of persistent insecticides.—Res. Rep. Coff. Res. Stn Lyamungu 1960 pp. 4355.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1940). An analysis of four years captures of insects in a light trap. Part II. The effect of weather conditions on insect activity; and the estimation and forecasting of changes in the insect population.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 90 pp. 227306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar