Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:48:07.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The potential of Lagenaria rootstock to confer resistance to the carmine spider mite, Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Cucurbitaceae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. Edelstein ,
Y. Tadmor ,
F. Abo-Moch ,
Z. Karchi  and
F. Mansour
M. Edelstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, PO Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel
Y. Tadmor
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, PO Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel
F. Abo-Moch
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, PO Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel
Z. Karchi
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, PO Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel
F. Mansour
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, PO Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel
*
*Fax: 972 4 983 6936 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Antibiosis and resistance of six Cucurbita and two Lagenaria accessions to the carmine spider mite, Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisduval, were evaluated in the laboratory. Significant differences among accessions were observed three days after the inoculation of detached leaf discs. The Lagenaria accessions, Slawi and Sus, proved to be the most resistant to mites, with average populations of mite eggs, 87 and 95%, respectively less than that of the susceptible C. pepoaccession, Orangetti. The Cucurbita accessions, Tace, Brava, Tetsukabuto, Phoenix and TZ-148 had mite egg totals 4, 9, 13, 26 and 40%, respectively, less than those of accession Orangetti. The Sus accession of Lagenaria was resistant to T. cinnabarinus from the four-leaf stage until fruit set in laboratory and field tests. Grafting the susceptible Brava onto Sus rootstock increased the resistance of the scion to the same level as that of non-grafted Sus. Grafting the susceptible Cucumis melo Noy Yizre’el on resistant or susceptible rootstocks of Cucurbita and Lagenaria accessions did not affect its susceptibility to T. cinnabarinus. The results indicate that resistance to T. cinnabarinuscan be transferred by grafting from Lagenaria stocks to Cucurbita scions but not in the opposite direction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , April 2000 , pp. 113 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcañiz, E., Pinochet, J. & Fernández, C. (1996) Evaluation of Prunus rootstocks for root-lesion nematode resistance. HortScience 31, 1013–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avidov, Z. & Harpaz, I. (1969) Plant pests of Israel. 549 pp. Jerusalem, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Press.Google Scholar
De Ponti, O.M.B. (1978) Resistance of Cucumis sativus to Tetranychus urticae Koch. 3. Search for sources of resistance. Euphytica 27, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhooria, M.S., Singh, D., Sukhija, B.S. & Bhathol, G.S. (1987) Differential response of watermelon accessions for resistance of red spider mite, Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval). Journal of Research of the Punjab Agriculture University 24, 590–594.Google Scholar
Edelstein, M., Cohen, R., Burger, Y., Shriber, S., Pivonia, S. & Shtienberg, D. (1999) Integrated management of sudden wilt in melons caused by Monosporascus cannonballus, using grafting and reduced rates of methyl bromide. Plant Disease 83, 1142–1145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, J.D. (1999) The role of adaptation to host plants in the evolution of reproductive isolation: negative evidence from Tetranychus urticae Koch. Experimental and Applied Acarology 23, 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlagh, M. & Ester, E. (1985) A new adaptation of Fusarium oxysporum to a cucurbitaceous crop. Mededelingen Van de Rijksfaculteit Landbouwwetenschappen Te Gent 50, 1045–1048.Google Scholar
Hoagland, D.R. (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 347.Google Scholar
Lee, J.M. (1994) Cultivation of grafted vegetables I. Current status, grafting methods, and benefits. HortScience 29, 235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansour, F. & Karchi, Z. (1990) The evaluation of antibiosis of selected lines for resistance of melon to the carmine spider mite Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Acari: Tetranychidae). Bulletin of Entomolgical Research 80, 343–347.Google Scholar
Mansour, F. & Karchi, Z. (1994) Resistance to carmine spider mite in watermelon. Phytoparasitica 22, 43–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansour, F., Karchi, Z. & Omari, N. (1987) Resistance of melon to the carmine spider mite Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval) (Acari: Tetranychidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 603–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansour, F., Shain, Z., Karchi, Z. & Gerzon, M. (1994) Resistance of selected melon lines to the carmine spider mite Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Acari: Tetranychidae) – field and laboratory experiments. Bulletin of Entomological Research 84, 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perring, T.M. & Chandler, L.D. (1996) Damage caused by arthropods, pp. 67–68in Zitter, T.A., Hopkins, D.L. & Thomas, C.E. (Eds) Compendium of cucurbit diseases. Minneapolis, APS Press.Google Scholar
Scully, T.B., East, D.A., Eidelson, V.J. & Cox, L.E. (1991) Resistance to the two spotted spider mite in muskmelon. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticulture Society 104, 276–278.Google Scholar
Tadmor, Y., Lewinsohn, E., Abu-Moch, F., Bar-Zur, A. & Mansour, F. (1999) Antibiosis of maize inbred lines to the carmine spider mite, Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Acari: Tetranychidae). Phytoparasitica 27, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomczyk, A. (1989) Physiological and chemical responses of different host plants to infestation by spider mites (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Warsaw, Warsaw Agricultural University Press.Google Scholar
Tulisalo, U. (1972) Resistance to the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina, Tetranychidae) in the genera Cucumis and Citrullus (Cucurbitaceae). Annals Entomologici Fennici 38, 60–64.Google Scholar