Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:43:42.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polyandry and trade-off between fecundity and longevity in female Dichelops furcatus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2019

M.F. Cingolani*
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE) (CONICET – UNLP. Centro Asociado CIC), Boulevard 120s/n entre 60 y 64 (1900), La Plata, Argentina
M.F. Roggiero
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE) (CONICET – UNLP. Centro Asociado CIC), Boulevard 120s/n entre 60 y 64 (1900), La Plata, Argentina
M.C. Barakat
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE) (CONICET – UNLP. Centro Asociado CIC), Boulevard 120s/n entre 60 y 64 (1900), La Plata, Argentina
G.G. Liljesthröm
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE) (CONICET – UNLP. Centro Asociado CIC), Boulevard 120s/n entre 60 y 64 (1900), La Plata, Argentina
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +54-2214232140 Fax: +54-2214232327 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A trade-off is a relationship between two life history characteristics principally reproduction and adult longevity that are fundamental in predicting the optimal life history in any given environment. Mating is indispensable for sexual reproduction, but also can impose risks to females. Nevertheless, in the majority of insects, females allow multiple mating. Dichelops furcatus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) is a pest of wheat and corn in Argentina and southern Brazil, but little is known about its reproduction (i.e., the characteristics of the process that results in offspring). We analyzed reproductive attributes of D. furcatus, and the effect of single mating vs. multiple matings, evaluating the trade-off between fecundity and adult female longevity. We found that mating is not required for D. furcatus to oviposit, and multiple copulations were costly in terms of reduced longevity. Although multicopulated females lived a shorter period, only the pre- and post-reproductive periods were shortened. Fecundity was not affected but fertility was incremented in multicopulated females. Females copulated only once oviposited most of the eggs in the first half of the reproductive period, while eggs oviposited in the second half were all inviable (did not hatch). Studying demographic attributes of phytophagous insects provides relevant information to better understand the population dynamics of pests.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, T.S. (2000) Effect of diet and mating status on ovarian development in a predaceous stink bug Perillus bioculatus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93, 529535.Google Scholar
Arnqvist, G. & Nilsson, T. (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behavior 60, 145164.Google Scholar
Begon, M., Townsend, C.R. & Harper, J.L. (2006) Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems. 4th edn. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, C.J.A. & McMahon, C.R. (2008) Fecundity. pp. 15351543 in Jørgensen, S.E. & Fath, B.D. (Eds) Population Dynamics. Vol. 2 of Encyclopedia of Ecology. Oxford, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Burpee, D.M. & Sakaluk, S.K. (1993) Repeated matings offset costs of reproduction in female crickets. Evolutionary Ecology 7, 240250.Google Scholar
Cambridge, J.E. (2016) Behavioral patterns of the brown marmorated stink bug and their implications for monitoring programs. PhD Thesis – Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
Chu, F.J., Zhou, Z.P., Li, P.R. & Liu, X.C. (1997) Study on control and observation of the bionomics characteristics of Halyomorpha picus Fabricias. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei 20, 1217.Google Scholar
Crudgington, H.S. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. (2000) Genital damage, kicking and early death – the battle of the sexes takes a sinister turn in the bean weevil. Nature 407, 855856.Google Scholar
Davey, K.G., Maimetes, I.K. & Ruegg, R.P. (1986) The relationship between crop size and egg production in Rhodnius prolixus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, 26542657.Google Scholar
De Loof, A. (2011) Longevity and aging in insects: is reproduction costly; cheap; beneficial or irrelevant? A critical evaluation of the ‘trade-off’ concept. Journal of Insect Physiology 57, 111.Google Scholar
Fortes, P. & Cônsoli, F.L. (2011) Are there costs in the repeated mating activities of female Southern stink bugs Nezara viridula? Physiological Entomology 36, 215219.Google Scholar
Fortes, P., Salvador, G. & Cônsoli, F.L. (2011) Ovary development and maturation in Nezara viridula (L.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Neotropical Entomology 40, 8996.Google Scholar
García-González, F. (2004) Infertile matings and sperm competition: the effect of ‘Nonsperm Representation’ on intraspecific variation in sperm precedence patterns. American Naturalist 164, 457472.Google Scholar
Gillott, C. (2003) Male accessory gland secretions: modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. Annual Review of Entomology 48, 163184.Google Scholar
Gullan, P.J. & Cranston, P.S. (2010) The Insects: An Outline of Entomology. Chichester, West Sussex, Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biologicla Review 75, 2164.Google Scholar
Kawada, H. & Kitamura, C. (1983) The reproductive behavior of the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha mista Uhler (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), 1: observation of mating behavior and multiple copulation. Applied Entomology and Zoology 18, 234242.Google Scholar
Masner, P. (1966) The structure, function and imaginal development of the female inner reproductive organs of Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze) (Heteroptera: Miridae). Acta Entomologica Bohemoslov 63, 177199.Google Scholar
McLain, D.K. (1992) Preference for polyandry in female stink bugs, Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Journal of Lnsect Behavior 5, 403410.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W.C. & Mau, R.F. (1969) Sexual activity and longevity of the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 62, 12461247.Google Scholar
Okada, K., Archer, R.C., Katsuki, M., Suzaki, Y., Sharma, M.D., House, C.M. & Hosken, D.J. (2015) Polyandry and fitness in female horned flour beetles, Gnatocerus cornutus. Animal Behaviour 106, 1116.Google Scholar
Panizzi, A.R. (2000) Economic importance of stink bugs (Pentatomidae). pp. 421474 in Schaefer, C.W. & Panizzi, A.R. (Eds) Heteroptera of Economic Importance. Boca Ratón, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, P.R.V.S., Salvadori, J.R., Lau, D., Marsaro, A.L. Jr. & Panizzi, A.R. (2013) Trigo: manejo integrado de pragas. Doc. Num. 113. Passo Fundo, Embrapa.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online at http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Reguera, P., Pomiankowski, A., Fowler, K. & Chapman, T. (2004) Low cost of reproduction in female stalk-eyed flies, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Journal of Insect Physiology 50, 103108.Google Scholar
Sillén-Tullberg, B. (1981) Prolonged copulation: a male ‘postcopulatory’ strategy in a promiscuous species, Lygaeus equestris (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 9, 283, 289.Google Scholar
Silva, C.C.A., Laumann, R.A., Ferreira, J.B.C., Blassioli Moraes, M.C., Borges, M. & Čokl, A. (2012) Reproductive Biology, Mating Behavior, and Vibratory Communication of the Brown-Winged Stink Bug, Edessa meditabunda (Fabr.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Psyche, Article ID 598086.Google Scholar
Wightman, J.A. (1973) Ovariole microstructure and vitellogenesis in Lygocoris pabulinus (Hemiptera: Mirida) and other mirids. Journal of Entomology Serie A 48, 103115.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Zera, A.J. & Harshman, L.G. (2001) The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32, 95126.Google Scholar