Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:40:12.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oviposition preferences of dengue vectors; Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Sri Lanka under laboratory settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2017

N. Gunathilaka ,
T. Ranathunge ,
L. Udayanga ,
A. Wijegunawardena  and
W. Abeyewickreme
N. Gunathilaka*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka
T. Ranathunge
Affiliation:
Molecular Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka
L. Udayanga
Affiliation:
Molecular Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka
A. Wijegunawardena
Affiliation:
Molecular Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka
W. Abeyewickreme
Affiliation:
C/O, National Research Council funded Dengue Mega Project, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka
*
*Author for correspondence: Tel: +94 11 2958039 Fax: +94 11 2958337 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Investigations on oviposition behaviour of dengue vectors are critical for effective controlling of vector breeding. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the oviposition behaviour of dengue vectors, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Sri Lanka. Batches of 1000 adult mosquitoes (1 : 1, male: female ratio) housed in rearing cages were used for each experimental setup from Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. Oviposition responses with respect to the size of the ovitrap, colours of the ovitrap, water source, sodium chloride (NaCl) concentration and presence/absence of larvae were evaluated by enumerating the number of eggs laid in the ovitraps. The analysis of variance and cluster analysis were used to investigate the significance in the variations among oviposition. The number of eggs laid by both species were improved with the increasing size of ovitraps. Ae. albopictus indicated the highest mean number of eggs in 0.2% of NaCl than in the ovitraps filled with distilled water. However, the egg laying preference was reduced with increasing salinity in both species. Drain water with low dissolved oxygen (DO) level (0.43 ± 0.12 mg l−1) was the preferred water source for both species, while a significantly high oviposition rate was observed in ovitraps with larvae. Black colour ovitraps attracted the majority of gravid females, while white was least preferred. There were no significant variations among oviposition behaviours of Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti. The ability of these vectors to breed in waste water with low DO levels may lead them to attain wide dissemination in the natural environment, enhancing their potential threat to human life.

Keywords

Aedesovipositionovitrapsbehaviourcontrol
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 108 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 442 - 450
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apostol, B.L., Black, W.C., Reiter, P. & Miller, B.R. (1994) Use of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA amplified by polymerase chain reaction markers to estimate the number of Aedes aegypti families at oviposition sites in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 51(1), 89–97.Google Scholar
Arbaoui, A.A. & Chua, T.H. (2014) Bacteria as a source of oviposition attractant for Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Tropical Biomedicine 31, 134–142.Google Scholar
Beehler, J.W. & Mulla, M.S. (1995) Effects of organic enrichment on temporal distribution and abundance of culicine egg rafts. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 11(2), 167–171.Google Scholar
Bentley, M.D. & Day, J.F. (1989) Chemical ecology and behavioral aspects of mosquito oviposition. Annual Review of Entomology 34(1), 401–421.Google Scholar
Blaustein, L. (1999) Oviposition site selection in response to risk of predation: evidence from aquatic habitats and consequences for population dynamics and community structure. pp. 441–456 in Wasser, S.P. (Ed.) Evolutionary Theory and Processes: Modern Perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Blaustein, L. & Kotler, B.P. (1993) Oviposition habitat selection by the mosquito, Culiseta longiareolata: effects of conspecifics, food and green toad tadpoles. Ecological Entomology 18(2), 104–108.Google Scholar
Bonnet, D.D. & Chapman, H.E.R.A.L.D. (1956) The importance of mosquito breeding in tree holes with special reference to the problem in Tahiti. Mosquito News 16(4), 301–305.Google Scholar
Brito-Arduino, M., Marques, G.R.A.M. & Serpa, L.L.N. (2010) Registro de larvas e pupas de Ae. aegypti e Aedes albopictus em recipientes com água salina em condições naturais [Record of larvae and pupae of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in containers with saline water in natural conditions]. Boletim Epidemiológico Paulista (BEPA) 83(7), 228.Google Scholar
Brito Arduino, M., Mucci, L.F., Serpa, L.L.N. & Rodrigues, M.D.M. (2015) Effect of salinity on the behavior of Aedes aegypti populations from the coast and plateau of southeastern Brazil. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases 52(1), 79–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Center for Disease Control (CDC). (2016) Surveillance and Control of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in the United States. Center for Disease Control (CDC) and prevention. Available at; http://www.cdc.gov/chikungunya/resources/vector-control.html.Google Scholar
Chadee, D.D., Corbet, P.S. & Greenwood, J.J.D. (1990) Egg-laying yellow fever mosquitoes avoid sites containing eggs laid by themselves or by conspecifics. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 57(3), 295–298.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. (1960). Aedes Aegypti (L.) the Yellow Fever Mosquito: Its Life History, Bionomics and Structure. Aëdes Aegypti (L.) the Yellow Fever Mosquito: Its Life History, Bionomics and Structure. London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, K.B., Chua, I.L., Chua, I.E. & Chua, K.H. (2004) Differential preferences of oviposition by Aedes mosquitos in man-made containers under field conditions. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine & Public Health 35(3), 599–607.Google Scholar
Colton, Y.M., Chadee, D.D. & Severson, D.W. (2003) Natural skip oviposition of the mosquito Aedes aegypti indicated by codominant genetic markers. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 17(2), 195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derraik, J.G. & Slaney, D. (2005) Container aperture size and nutrient preferences of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Auckland region, New Zealand. Journal of Vector Ecology 30(1), 73.Google ScholarPubMed
Gunathilaka, N., Abeyewickreme, W., Hapugoda, M. & Wickremasinghe, R. (2015) Species composition and diversity of malaria vector breeding habitats in Trincomalee District of Sri Lanka. BioMed Research International 2015, 823810. doi:10.1155/2015/823810.Google Scholar
Kiflawi, M., Blaustein, L. & Mangel, M. (2003) Oviposition habitat selection by the mosquito Culiseta longiareolata in response to risk of predation and conspecific larval density. Ecological Entomology 28, 168–173.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Macfie, J.W.S. (1921) The effect of saline solutions and sea-water on Stegomyia Fasciata. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology 15(4), 377–380.Google Scholar
McDaniel, I.N., Bentley, M.D., Lee, H.P. & Yatagai, M. (1976) Effects of color and larval-produced oviposition attractants on oviposition of Aedes triseriatus. Environmental Entomology 5(3), 553–556.Google Scholar
Millar, J.G., Chaney, J.D., Beehler, J.W. & Mulla, M.S. (1994) Interaction of the Culex quinquefasciatus egg raft pheromone with a natural chemical associated with oviposition sites. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 10(3), 374–379.Google Scholar
Nadeeka, P.V.J., Gunathilaka, P.A.D.H.N. & Amarasinghe, L.D. (2014) Geographic, economic and socio-cultural factors which defining the risk of dengue transmission in Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. Journal of Experimental Biology 2, 158–164.Google Scholar
Navarro, D.M.A.F., Oliveira, P.E.S., Potting, R.P.J., Brito, A.C., Fital, S.J.F. & Goulart Sant'Ana, A.E. (2003) The potential attractant or repellent effects of different water types on oviposition in Ae. aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 127(1), 46–50.Google Scholar
Panigrahi, S.K., Barik, T.K., Mohanty, S. & Tripathy, N.K. (2014) Laboratory evaluation of oviposition behavior of field collected Aedes mosquitoes. Journal of Insects 2014, 207489. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/207489.Google Scholar
Petranka, J.W. & Fakhoury, K. (1991) Evidence of a chemically-mediated avoidance response of ovipositing insects to blue-gills and green frog tadpoles. Copeia 19, 273–279.Google Scholar
Puggioli, A., Balestrino, F., Damiens, D., Lees, R.S., Soliban, S.M., Madakacherry, O. & Gilles, J.R.L. (2013) Efficiency of three diets for larval development in mass rearing Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 50(4), 819–825.Google Scholar
Ramasamy, R., Surendran, S.N., Jude, P.J., Dharshini, S. & Vinobaba, M. (2011) Larval development of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in peri-urban brackish water and its implications for transmission of arboviral diseases. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 5(11), e1369.Google Scholar
Reiskind, M.H. & Zarrabi, A.A. (2012) Water surface area and depth determine oviposition choice in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 49(1), 71–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resetarits, W.J. & Wilbur, H.M. (1989) Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelis: role of predators and competitors. Ecology 70(1), 220–228.Google Scholar
Rueda, L.M. (2004) Pictorial keys for the identification of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) associated with dengue virus transmission. Zootaxa 589, 1–60.Google Scholar
Soares, F.A., Silva, J.C., Oliveira, J.B.B.S. & Abreu, F.V.S.D. (2015) Study of oviposition behavior of Aedes aegypti in two neighborhoods under the influence of semi-arid climate in the municipality of Salinas, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista de Patologia Tropical 44, 77–88.Google Scholar
Spencer, M., Blaustein, L. & Cohen, J.E. (2002) Oviposition habitat selection by mosquitoes Culiseta longiareolata and consequences for population size. Ecology 83, 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stav, G., Blaustein, L. & Margalith, J. (1999) Experimental evidence for predation risk sensitive oviposition by a mosquito, Culiseta longiareolata. Ecological Entomology 24(2), 202–207.Google Scholar
Sunahara, T., Ishizaka, K. & Mogi, M. (2002) Ha6bitat size: a factor determining the opportunity for encounters between mosquito larvae and aquatic predators. Journal of Vector Ecology 27(1), 8–20.Google Scholar
Surendran, S.N., Jude, P.J., Thabothiny, V., Raveendran, S. & Ramasamy, R. (2012) Pre-imaginal development of Ae. aegypti in brackish and fresh water urban domestic wells in Sri Lanka. Journal of Vector Ecology 37(2), 471–473.Google Scholar
Wallis, R.C. (1954) The effect of population density and of NaCl concentrations in test series in laboratory experiments with ovipositing Aedes aegypti. Mosquito News 14, 200–204.Google Scholar
Washburn, J.O. (1995) Regulatory factors affecting larval mosquito populations in container and pool habitats: implication for biological control. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 11, 279–283.Google ScholarPubMed