Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:25:16.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oviposition in DDT-resistant and susceptible strains of Aedes aegypti (L.): time from blood-meal to oviposition1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. J. Wood
R. J. Wood
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Oviposition time (the time from blood-meal to egg deposition) has been investigated in five strains of Aedes aegypti (L.), two being DDT-resistant (from Trinidad and Haiti) and three susceptible (from West Africa (2) and Haiti). All the strains except the two DDT-resistant ones differed significantly from one another in mean oviposition time.

There was a close correlation between mean oviposition time, oviposition period (the over-all period during which eggs are laid) and ‘oviposition light preference’, both the former being greater in the ‘dark-laying’ strains than in the ‘light-laying’ ones. There was a positive correlation amongst four of the strains between degree of DDT-resistance and both mean oviposition time and oviposition period; the fifth, which combined long oviposition time with susceptibility to DDT, was a recently colonised West African strain.

In small mass crosses between two strains differing markedly in mean oviposition time, this character showed no dominance; it appears to be under poly genie control. Evidence is given which indicates that there is no close genetic connection between oviposition time and DDT-resistance. There is also no obvious genetic association between oviposition time and ‘oviposition light preference’.

It is concluded that the observed differences in oviposition time may have come about as a result of DDT selection, but could equally well have been the result of a selective influence exercised by the laboratory environment.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , July 1962 , pp. 287 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agramonte, A. (1902). Mosquitoes and yellow fever genus Stegomyia (Theobald).—In Berkeley, W. H., Laboratory work with mosquitoes, pp. 91–108. New York, Pediatrics Lab.Google Scholar
Ardelean, I. & Cristescu, A. (1960). Cercetaări asupra rezistentei anofelilor la insecticidele remanente.—Igiena, Bucharest 9 pp. 41–52.Google Scholar
Burcham, E. G. (1957). Some characteristics and relations of mating and oviposition of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) (Diptera; Culicidae).—130 pp. Ph.D. thesis. Ohio St. Univ.Google Scholar
Buxtox, P. A. & Hopkins, G. H. E. (1927). Researches in Polynesia and Melanesia…Parts I–IV.—Mem. Land. Sch. Hyg. trap. Med. no. 1, 260 pp.Google Scholar
SirChristophers, S. E. (1960). Aëdes aegypti (L.) the yellow fever mosquito: its life history, bionomics and structure.—739 pp. London, Cambridge Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
Fielding, J. W. (1919). Notes on the bionomics of Stegomyia fasciata Fabr. Part I.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 13 pp. 259–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillett, J. D. (1955). Behaviour differences in two strains of Aëdes aegypti.—Nature, Lond. 176 pp. 124–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillett, J. D. (1956). Genetic differences affecting egg-laying in the mosquito Aëdes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus).—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 50 pp. 362–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goeldi, E. A. (1905). Os mosquitos no Parà.—Mem. Mus. Goeldi no. 4, 154 pp.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. J. & Gillett, J. D. (1957). Observations on the oviposition-cycle of Aëdes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus).—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 51 pp. 159–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horsfall, W. R. (1955). Mosquitoes: their bionomics and relation to disease.—723 pp. New York, Ronald Pr.Google Scholar
Howard, L. O. (1923). The yellow-fever mosquito.—Fmrs' Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 1354, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Lineva, V. A. (1960). Alterations in the ovogenesis of the housefly Musca domestica L. under the effect of insecticides.—Communication to the XIth International Congress of Entomology Vienna 1960, Section 10.Google Scholar
Macdonald, W. W. (1956). Aëdes aegypti in Malaya. II.—Larval and adult biology.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 50 pp. 399–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchoux, E., Salimbeni, A. T. & Simond, P. L. (1903). La fièvre jaune. Rapport de la mission française.—Ann. Inst. Pasteur 17 pp. 665–731.Google Scholar
O'gower, A. K. (1957). The influence of the surface on oviposition by Aëdes aegypti (Linn.) (Diptera, Culicidae).—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 82 pp. 240–244.Google Scholar
Shannon, R. C. & Putnam, P. (1934). The biology of Stegomyia under laboratory conditions. I-II.—Proc. cnt. Soc. Wash. 36 pp. 185–242.Google Scholar
Woke, P. A. (1955). Deferred oviposition in Aëdes aegypti (Linnaeus) (Diptera: Culicidae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 48 pp. 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R. J. (1959a). Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes.—Ann. appl. Biol. 47 pp. 620–625.Google Scholar
Wood, R. J. (1959b). Laboratory studies on the biology of DDT-resistant and susceptible strains of Aedes aegypti Linn.—Ph.D. thesis, Lond. Sell. Hyg. trop. Med.Google Scholar
Wood, R. J. (1961). Oviposition in DDT-resistant and susceptible strains of Aedcs aegypti (L.) in relation to light preference.—Bull. ent. Res. 52 pp. 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar