Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:40:19.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ovarian and larval development of the sheep headfly, Hydrotaea irritans (Fallén) (Diptera, Muscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. C. Kirkwood
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK.

Abstract

The biology of Hydrotaea irritans (Fall.) has been studied at Weybridge since 1973. The flies have failed to mate in cages and only those which have been fertilised before capture have laid viable eggs in the laboratory. In experiments in 1975–76 flies in the field emerged from June onwards but development of the ovaries (noted in seven stages) to the point of ovi-position was not completed until September. Some 1400 larvae were established in culture and, although they had reached a maximum size by January, they continued to feed until 14 March. Pupation lasted for 25 to 32 days during 6 May to 12 June and a total of 185 flies emerged from 4 June to 9 July. The results of these experiments confirm that H. irritans does not diapause and that the species is univoltine.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahr, L. (1955). Fortsatte undersøgelser vedrørende ‘sommermastitis’ hos goldkvaeget. Anden meddelelse.—Dansk Maanedskr. Dyrlaeg. 36, 365388.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. R. (1911). The development of the egg follicle in anophelines.—Paludism no. 2, 7388.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. D. (1974). Variation in the proportion of different reproductive stages of female bushflies (Musca vetustissima Wlk. (Diptera, Muscidae)) in bait catches as a cause of error in population estimates.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 6571.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, A. C. (1975). Some further observations on the biology of the headfly Hydrotaea irritans.—Parasitology, Cambridge 71, appendix, x–xi.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, A. C. & Tarry, D. W. (1973). A survey of some species of flies associated with cattle.—Int. Pest Contr. 15, no. 5, 610.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B. O., Nielsen, B. M. & Christensen, O. (1971). Bidrag til plantagefluens, Hydrotaea irritans Fall., biologi (Diptera, Muscidae).—Ent. Meddr. 39, 3044.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. & Luff, M. L. (1976). The sheep headfly, Hydrotaea irritans (Fall.) (Diptera, Muscidae): larval habitat and immature stages.—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 579586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, G. H. (1974). Studies on the aetiology and transmission of summer mastitis.—Nord. VetMed. 26, 122132.Google Scholar
Tarry, D. W. (1975). The significance of feeding and blood-meal identification studies in the planning of sheep head-fly control measures.—Proc. 8th Br. Insecticide and Fungicide Conf. 1975 2, 573580.Google Scholar
Tarry, D. W. & Kirkwood, A. C. (1974). Hydrotaea irritans: the sheep headfly in Britain.—Bri. vet. J. 130, 180188.Google ScholarPubMed
Tarry, D. W. & Kirkwood, A. C. (1976). Biology and development of the sheep headfly Hydrotaea irritans (Fall.) (Diptera, Muscidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 587594.Google Scholar
Tyndale-Biscoe, M. & Hughes, R. D. (1969). Changes in the female reproductive system as age indicators in the bushfly Musca vetustissima Wlk.—Bull. ent. Res. 59, 129141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, J. (1961). Inducing mating and oviposition of the warble flies Hypoderma bovis (L.) and H. lineatum (DeVill.) (Diptera: Oestridae) in captivity.—Can. Ent. 93, 149156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, W. G., Woodburn, T. L. & Tyndale-Biscoe, M. (1974). A method of age determination in Lucilia cuprina (Wied.) (Diptera, Calliphoridae) using cyclic changes in the female reproductive system.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 365370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar