Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:59:10.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Identity of an Ichneumonid Parasite of Hepialus lupulinus (L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Ewen Cameron
Affiliation:
Biology Dept., St. Mary's Hospital Medical College, University of London.

Extract

A paper by the present writer on an Ichneumonid parasite of Hepialus lupulinus (L.) under the name Alomya debellator (F.) appeared in the last issue of this journal (1950). It now transpires that this Ichneumonid is not A. debellator but Ichneumon suspiciosus Wesm. This error was pointed out, as soon as the paper was published, by Mr. J. F. Perkins of the British Museum, and agreed by Mr. G. J. Kerrich of the Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, both of whom, as specialists in the Ichneumonidae, recognised the illustration produced from a drawing prepared by Mr. A. J. E. Terzi as representing a species of Ichneumon, probably I. suspiciosus. The actual specimen illustrated has been traced, and its identification has been confirmed by Mr. Perkins as Ichneumon suspiciosus Wesm. It is certain, moreover, that all the parasite material involved was this species and not A. debellator.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, E. (1950). The biology and economic importance of Alomya debellator (F.), a remarkable parasite of the swift moth Hepialus lupulinus (L.).—Bull. ent. Res., 41, pp. 429438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, G. L. R. (1925). In Gardiner, J. S. The Natural History of Wicken Fen. A preliminary account of the Ichneumonidae of the Cambridgeshire Fens, 2, pp. 122139.Google Scholar
Waterston, J. (1926). Anote on Alomyia debellator Fab.—Ent. mon. Mag. 62, pp. 9899.Google Scholar