Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:11:06.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Sandflies from Persia and Palestine*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

S. Adler ,
O. Theodor  and
E. M. Lourie
S. Adler
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Microbiological Institute, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
O. Theodor
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Microbiological Institute, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
E. M. Lourie
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Microbiological Institute, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The distribution and bionomics of the species of Phlebotomus in N.W. Persia are described.

The distribution of Leishmania in this area and the possible relations of sandflies to it are discussed.

Observations on the quite distinct and well-defined hours of activity of the different species are recorded.

P. chinensis is recorded from Persia for the first time.

The diagnosis of the female of P. caucasicus is established.

P. wenyoni, sp. n., P. kandelaki, Schour., and P. perniciosus var. tobbi, var. n., are described.

A simple method of breeding sandflies while travelling is described.

P. perniciosus var. tobbi was infected by feeding on cultures of L. donovani of Mediterranean origin.

P. caucasicus was infected by feeding on cultures of L. tropica.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 1930 , pp. 529 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, S. & Theodor, O. (1929). The distribution of Sandflies and Leishmaniasis in Palestine, Syria and Mesopotamia.—Ann. Trop. Med. & Parasitol., xxiii, pp. 269–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzinovski, E. (1917). Phlebotomus Caucasicus, sp. n.—Medical Revue, Moscow, lxxxvii, pp. 611–614.Google Scholar
Newstead, R. (1920). On the genus Phlebotomus. IV.—Bull. Ent. Res., xi, pp. 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitzulescu, V. (1929a). Contributions à l'étude des phlébotomes de Roumanie.—Annales de Parasitologie, vii, pp. 430–437.Google Scholar
Nitzulescu, V. (1929b). Sur quelques phlébotomes de Yougoslavie.—Annales de Parasitologie, vii, pp. 494–505.Google Scholar
Parrot, L. (1917). Sur un nouveau phlébotomus algerien (Phlebotomus sergenti, sp. nov.).—Bull. Soc. Path. exot., x, p. 564.Google Scholar
Parrot, L. (1926). A propos de Phlebotomus caucasicus et de Phlebotomus sergenti.—Arch. Schiff. Trop. Hyg., xxx, pp. 719–720.Google Scholar
Parrot, L. (1928). Notes sur les phlébotomes. II. Sur quelques phlébotomes de la Bokhara (U.R.S.S.).—Arch. Inst. Pasteur d'Algérie, vi, pp. 26–34.Google Scholar
Perfiliev, P. P. (1929). Sur les phlébotomes du Turkestan et sur Phlebotomus sergenti var. alexandri Sinton.—Bull. Soc. Path, exot., xxii, pp. 545–549.Google Scholar
Popov, P. P. (1925). On the discovery of Phlebotomus caucasicus, Marzinovski 1917, in Turkestan, Afghanistan and Bokhara and the Difference between it and Phlebotomus sergenti, Parrot 1917.—Vestnik Microbiologii i Epidemiologii, Saratov, iv, pp. 88–97.Google Scholar
Popov, P. P. (1926). Ueber einen neuen russischen Phlebotomus und die bisher in Russland entdeckten Phlebotomen.—Arch. Schiffs. Trop. Hyg., xxx, pp. 240–248.Google Scholar
Popov, P. P. (1928). Bemerkungen zu: L. Parrot, A propos de Phlebotomus caucasicus et de P. sergenti.—Arch. Schiffs. Trop. Hyg., xxxii, pp. 148–149.Google Scholar
Schlimmer, J. L. (1874). Terminologie Medico-Pharmaceutique et Anthropologique Iraneaise Persane, pp. 81–89.Google Scholar
Sinton, J. A. (1928). The Synonymy of the Asiatic Species of Phlebotomus.—Ind. Jl. Med. Res., xvi, pp. 297–324.Google Scholar