Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:17:45.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Olfactory Stimulation of Tsetse Flies and Blowflies*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. C. Hughes
Affiliation:
Imperial College Field Station, Sunninghill, Berks.

Extract

An apparatus for exposing insects to known concentrations of vapours from odorous liquids is described; it was used in a laboratory in England to test adult tsetse flies, Glossina palpalis (R.-D.) and G. morsitans Westw., obtained from Africa as pupae, and the blowfly, Phormia terraenovae R.-D. There is a definite pattern of behaviour of the flies in olfactory stimulants, in the final phase of which they are excited to fly. The number of seconds for which a fly is in flight gives a measure of its activation by the vapour. The method gives results comparable with those obtained with a standard choice-chamber technique and has considerable practical advantages for work with tsetse flies. The effects of concentrations of vapour, period of exposure, condition of the flies and external conditions on the response of tsetse flies to vapours were studied.

The response of G. morsitans and P. terraenovae to a selection of aliphatic acids, alcohols, esters and amines was determined, using a standardised procedure. There is a marked similarity between the two species in the concentrations of vapours required to activate them. The standard molar concentration, defined as the concentration of vapour required to raise the activity of the flies to a standard level of ten times that in pure air, was calculated for each compound tested from the regression of activity on concentration. Threshold concentrations (the highest concentrations that failed to raise fly-activity) were also calculated from the regression equations.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon (1933). International critical tables for numerical data.—New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Anon (1941). Chemical engineers' handbook.—New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Baradi, A. F. & Bourne, G. H. (1951). Nature, Lond., 168, pp. 977979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorley, T. W. (1948). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond., (A) 23, pp. 911.Google Scholar
Dethier, V. G. (1954 a). Amer. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 3, pp. 160171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier, V. G. (1954 b). J. gen. Physiol., 37, pp. 743751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier, V. G. & Yost, M. T. (1952). J. gen. Physiol., 35, pp. 823839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Erichsen, L. (1952). Naturwissenschaften, 39, p. 189.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. (1939). Proc. roy. Soc., (B) 127, pp. 387404.Google Scholar
Findlay, G. M., Hardwicke, J. & Phelps, A. J. (1946). Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 40, pp. 341344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulden, C. H. (1952). Methods of statistical analysis.—New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, A. L. (1951). Biol. Rev., 26, p. 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, W. M. & Craig, R. (1934). J. econ. Ent., 27, pp. 10291036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maryott, A. A. & Smith, E. R. (1951). Circ. nat. Bur. Stand. no. 514.Google Scholar
Mullins, L. J. (1954). Chem. Rev., 54, p. 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. (1930). Bull. ent. Res., 21, pp. 201256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. (1955). Bull. ent. Res., 46, pp. 357368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phadke, E. S. (1952). J. Indian Inst. Sci., 34, pp. 189207.Google Scholar
Roadhouse, L. A. O. (1953). Canad. J. Zool., 31, pp. 535546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, F. O. & Bear, R. S. (1939). Biol. Rev., 14, p. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidell, A. (1941). Solubilities of organic compounds.—New York, van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Stull, D. R. (1947). Industr. Engng Chem., 39, p. 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesson, L. G. (1949). Tables of electric dipole moments.—Cambridge, Mass., Tech. Pr., Mass. Inst. Tech.Google Scholar
Willis, E. R. & Roth, L. M. (1952). J. exp. Zool., 121, pp. 149179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, D. & Thompson, B. W. (1954). Bull. ent. Res., 45, pp. 7992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar