Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T01:24:58.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Occurrence of sexuals of African weaver ant (Oecophylla longinoda Latreille) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) under a bimodal rainfall pattern in eastern Tanzania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2014

R.G. Rwegasira ,
M. Mwatawala ,
G.M. Rwegasira  and
J. Offenberg
R.G. Rwegasira*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science and Production, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3005 Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania
M. Mwatawala
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science and Production, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3005 Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania
G.M. Rwegasira
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science and Production, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3005 Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania
J. Offenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Biosciences, Aarhus University, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +255 754 484211 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The African weaver ant, Oecophylla longinoda, is being utilized as a biocontrol agent and may also be targeted for future protein production. Rearing of mated queens in nurseries for colony production is needed to cater for such demands. Thus, newly mated queens must be collected for use as seed stocks in the nurseries. To collect mated queens efficiently it is important to identify when sexuals occur in mature colonies. We studied the occurrence of sexuals in O. longinoda colonies for 2 years in Tanga, Tanzania, a region characterized by a bimodal rainfall pattern. We found that O. longinoda sexuals occurred almost throughout the year with abundance peaks from January to April. Production of sexuals appeared to be triggered by rainfall, suggesting that populations in areas with long rainy periods may show prolonged mating periods compared to populations experiencing extended dry periods. The bimodal rain pattern may thus cause a low production over a long period. The average yearly production of queens per tree and per colony was estimated to be 449 and 2753, respectively. The average number of queens per nest was 17. Worker abundance declined from January to March with minimum by the end of this period, being inversely proportional to the production of sexuals. In conclusion, mated queens may be collected almost throughout the year, but most efficiently by the onset of the long rainy season when the majority disperse.

Keywords

Oecophylla longinodasexualsbimodal rainfalldispersal flightsTanzania
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 182 - 186
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

FAO report . (2013) Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security. FAO forestry paper 171. Rome.Google Scholar
Hasegwa, E. (2013) Sex allocation in the ant Camponotus (Colobopsis) nipponicus (Wheeler): II. The effect of resource availability on sex-ratio variability. International Journal for the Study of Social Arthropods 60, 329–335.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1983) The evolution of communal nest-weaving in ants. American Scientist 71, 490–499.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990) The Ants p732. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
JMP 10 (2012) Statistical Discovery, SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Offenberg, J. (2011) Oecophylla smaragdina food conversion efficiency: prospects for ant farming. Journal of Applied Entomology 135, 575–581.Google Scholar
Offenberg, J. & Wiwaitwitaya, D. (2010) Sustainable weaver ant (Oecophylla smaragdina) farming: harvest yields and effects on worker ant density. Asian Myrmecology 3, 55–62.Google Scholar
Offenberg, J., Peng, R. & Nielsen, M.G. (2012) Development rate and brood production in haplo and pleometrotic colonies of Oecophylla smaragdina . Insectes Sociaux 59, 307–311.Google Scholar
Olotu, M.I., du Plessis, H., Seguni, Z.S. & Maniania, N.K. (2013) Efficacy of the African weaver ant Oecophylla longinoda (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the control of Helopeltis spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) and Pseudotheraptus Wayi (Hemiptera: Coreidae) in cashew crop in Tanzania. Pest Management Science 69(8), 911–918.Google Scholar
Ouagoussounon, I., Sinzogan, A., Offenberg, J., Adandonon, A.,Vayssieres, J.F. & Kossou, D. (2013). Pupae transplantation to boost early colony growth in the weaver ant Oecophylla longinoda Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 60(4), 374–379.Google Scholar
Peeters, C. & Andersen, A.N. (1989) Cooperation between dealated queens during colony foundation in the green tree ant, Oecophylla smaragdina . Psyche 96, 39–44.Google Scholar
Peng, R.K., Christian, K. & Gibb, K. (1999) The effect of colony isolation of the predacious ant, Oecophylla smaragdina (F.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), on protection of cashew plantations from insect pests. International Journal of Pest Management 45, 189–194.Google Scholar
Peng, R., Nielsen, M.G. , Offenberg, J. & Birkmose, D. (2013) Utilisation of multiple queens and pupae transplantation to boost early colony growth of weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina, Asian Myrmecology, 5, 177–184.Google Scholar
Perfecto, I. & Castiñeiras, A. (1998). Deployment of the predaceous ants and their conservation in agroecosystems. pp. 269–289 in Barbosa, P. (Ed) Conservation Biological Control. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Seguni, Z.S.K., Way, M.J. & Van Mele, P. (2011) The effect of ground vegetation management on competition between the ants Oecophylla longinoda and Pheidole megacephala and implications for conservation biological control. Crop Protection 30, 713–717.Google Scholar
Sribandit, W., Wiwatwitaya, D., Suksard, S. & Offenberg, J. (2008) The importance of weaver ant (Oecophylla smaragdina Fabricius) harvest to a local community in Northeastern Thailand. Asian Myrmecology 2, 129–138.Google Scholar
Stathers, T.E. (1995) Studies on the role of Oecophylla longinoda (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Cashew trees in Southern Tanzania. Naliendele Agricultural Research Institute, Mtwara, Tanzania p. 59.Google Scholar
Vanderplank, F.L. (1960) The bionomics & ecology of the red tree ant, Oecophylla sp., and its relationship to the coconut bug Pseudotheraptus wayi Brown (Coreidae). Journal of Animal Ecology 29, 15–33.Google Scholar
Van Itterbeeck, J., Sivongxay, N., Praxaysombath, B. & Van Huis, A. (2014) Indigenous knowledge of the edible weaver ant Oecophylla smaragdina fabricius Hymenoptera: formicidae from the Vientiane Plain, Lao PDR. Society of Ethnobiology 5, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Mele, P. & Vayssieres, J.F. (2007) Weaver ants help farmers to capture organic markets. Appropriate Technology 34(2), 22–26.Google Scholar
Van Mele, P., Vayssieres, J.F., Van Tillingen, E. & Vrolijks, J. (2007) Effects of an African weaver ant, Oecophylla longinoda, in controlling mango fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Benin Journal of Economic Entomology 100(3), 695–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M.J. (1954) Studies on the life history and ecology of the ant Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille). Bulletin of Entomological Research 45, 93–112.Google Scholar
Way, M.J. & Khoo, K.C. (1992) Role of ants in pest management. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 479–503.Google Scholar