Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:31:08.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on yams attacked by the yam beetle Heteroligus meles (Billb.) (Col., Dynastidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. L. Gregory
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Research, Nigeria.

Extract

Several species of Dynastid beetles are serious pests of yam (Dioscorea) in Nigeria, the adults attacking the setts and new tubers underground. The base of the yam vine and the roots are not generally damaged. The most important species is Heteroligus meles (Billb.).

H. meles does not breed in the yam fields, and the adults fly to them from breeding grounds that are distinct, and to which they return later.

The cultivation and growth of the yam plant in Nigeria are briefly described. Small tubers, or cut pieces of tubers (setts) are planted. The earlier the date of planting and of emergence of the vine from the soil, the heavier the vine and the new tuber.

An account is given of observations on the infestation, in relation to crop growth, of a plot of yellow yams (D. cayenensis) planted near Benin, in Western Nigeria on 29th March 1958.

Adults of H. meles were taken, from 3rd April to 26th June and again from 8th to 21st November, between 7 and 9 p.m., at a light-trap placed at a distance of ¼ mile from the plot.

Beetles entered the soil of yam hills within six inches of the vine, usually before 7 a.m., on mornings following evening flights, the entry holes usually being identifiable. The first vines were seen in the experimental plot on 19th April. Beetles did not enter a yam hill unless the vine had emerged.

The longer the exposure to flying beetles, the more likely were plants to be attacked, and bigger vines attracted more beetles than did smaller ones. Later planting decreased beetle damage, but a lower yield resulted.

At first the beetles fed on the sett, making and increasing the size of fewer lesions than later on the new yam. About the time that the flying period ended, the setts were starting to rot, and the beetles left the immediate vicinity of the yam plant, as no acceptable food was available. Most moved deeper into the soil, but a few left the plant altogether and flew away. After the new tubers had begun to develop, the beetles returned in early August from their positions deeper in the soil to feed on them, constantly making new lesions, more numerous but smaller than those made in the setts, averaging about 4 g. of yam eaten.

During late August and again in late September, a few beetles moved underground from the original plants attacked to others. In mid-November, the beetles left the yam fields altogether, presumably returning to the breeding area.

The reasons why the beetles fly away from the yam fields remain uncertain, but they may include the seasonal decline in rainfall, the maturation of the yam tuber and the development of the gonads.

Factors that can affect the rate of attack are the dates of planting and harvesting in relation to the period during which the beetles fly, the method of cultivation and the variety of yam planted.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annet, E. (1940). Note sur les dégâts causés aux bananiers par l' Heteronychus Claudius.—Rev. Bot. appl. 20 no. 222 pp. 119121.Google Scholar
Chevalier, A. (1937). Sur un coléoptère du genre Heteronychus causant des dégâts aux bananiers en Guinée française.—Rev. bot. appl. 17 no. 185 p. 65.Google Scholar
Dalziel, J. M. (1937). The useful plants of west tropical Africa.—xii, 612 pp. London, Crown Agents.Google Scholar
Golding, F. D. (1928). Notes on the yam pest Heteroligus claudius Klug, in the Benin and Warri Provinces of Nigeria.—7th annu. Bull, agric. Dep. Nigeria pp. 3843.Google Scholar
Jemmett, C. W. (1910). Annual Report of the Agricultural Department, Southern Provinces, Nigeria, 1910, p. 30.Google Scholar
Lean, O. B. (1928). A Dynastid beetle as a serious pest of yams in the Benue Province of Nigeria.—7th annu. Bull, agric. Dep. Nigeria pp. 4456.Google Scholar
Lean, O. B. (1929). Experiments on the life history and control of the yam beetle in the Benue Province of Nigeria.—8th annu. Bull, agric. Dep. Nigeria pp. 4357.Google Scholar
Peacock, A. D. (1913). Entomological pests and problems of southern Nigeria.—Bull. ent. Res. 4 pp. 191220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, H. S. (1952). On the behaviour of night-flying insects in the neighbourhood of a bright source of light.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 27 pp. 1321.Google Scholar
Vayssière, P. & Galland, H. (1950). Sur trois insectes d'importance économique encore peu connues en Afrique française.—Proc. 8th int. Congr. Ent., Stockholm 1948 pp. 699701.Google Scholar