Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:23:06.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the effects of γ-radiation on eggs of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forsk.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

P. Hunter-Jones  and
P. T. Haskell
P. Hunter-Jones
Affiliation:
Anti-Locust Research Centre, College House, Wrights Lane, London, W.8
P. T. Haskell
Affiliation:
Anti-Locust Research Centre, College House, Wrights Lane, London, W.8
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been suggested that nuclear radiation might be used for locust control, but insufficient knowledge has hitherto been available to decide whether such a measure is feasible. In this paper, the results of some laboratory experiments on the effect of γ-radiation on eggs of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forsk.), are described.

After a single dose of γ-radiation, the resulting mortality among the eggs was correlated with the size of the dose received and the age of the egg at the time of irradiation. The dose of radiation required to kill the older eggs was 40 times greater than that required to kill young eggs; thus, a dose of 144 rads caused almost complete inviability among eggs deposited one or two days before irradiation, but a dose in excess of 5,500 rads was required to kill eggs deposited eleven days earlier. For comparison, the lethal dose of γ-radiation for humans is estimated to be 400–700 rad.

When the irradiation dose was applied in three small fractions, with intervals between them, the percentage of eggs killed was less than when the same total dose was given in one exposure. This difference was presumably due to tissue recovery during the inter-radiation periods. The temperature to which the eggs were exposed during the inter-radiation periods also affected survival, recovery being greater at higher temperatures.

The possibility of using γ-radiation to control locust egg-fields, the cost of the equipment needed and the hazards involved are discussed. It is concluded that control by this method not only offers no advantage in terms of cost, effectiveness or convenience as compared with conventional insecticide treatment but would be very impractical and dangerous to operators and the inhabitants, human and domestic animal, of the treated area. It is possible that other control techniques utilising radiation, such as sterile-male release or attractant traps treated with a sterilant, may be useful against certain species of locusts after further work on the development of chemical attractants has been carried out.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , August 1966 , pp. 725 - 735
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colombo, G. (1959). Differente sensibilità ai raggi X in rapporto agli stadi di sviluppo di embrioni di Locusta migratoria migratorioides (R. e. F.).— Atti Accad. naz. Lincei Rc. 26 pp. 583–591.Google Scholar
Comar, C. L. (1955). Radioisotopes in biology and agriculture. Principles and practice.—481 pp. New York, etc., McGraw-Hill Book Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwell, P. B. (1963). Insect control—In Jefferson, S. Ed. Massive radiation techniques, pp. 141–198. London, George Newnes.Google Scholar
Evans, T. C. (1935). Some embryonic abnormalities caused by X-rays.—Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 42 pp. 207–208.Google Scholar
Grosch, D. S. (1962). Entomological aspects of radiation as related to genetics and physiology.—A. Rev. Ent. 7 pp. 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henshaw, P. S. & Henshaw, C. T. (1933). Changes in susceptibility of Drosophila eggs to X-rays. I. A correlation of changes in radiosensitivity with stages of development.—Radiology 21 p. 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, T. & Brownell, L. E. (1962). The use of radiation sources for insect control.—In Eadioisotopes and radiation in entomology, pp. 233–254. Vienna, Int. Atom. Energy Ag.Google Scholar
Hunter-Jones, P. (1961). Rearing and breeding locusts in the laboratory.— 12 pp. London, Anti-Locust Res. Cent.Google Scholar
Huque, H. (1963). Some observations in the effect of ionising radiation against desert locusts.—Pakist. J. Sci. 15 pp. 267–270.Google Scholar
Jefferies, D. J. (1962). The effects of continuous and fractionated doses of gamma-radiation on the survival and fertility of Sitophilus granarius (Calandra granaria L.).—In Radioisotopes and radiation in entomology, pp. 213–229. Vienna, Int. Atom. Energy Ag.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. W. (1955). α-Particle dosimetry and the inhibition of mitosis in the grasshopper neuroblast by low dosage α-irradiation.—Radiat. Res. 3 pp. 18–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slifer, E. H. (1931). Insect development. II. Mitotic activity in the grasshopper embryo.—J. Morph. 51 pp. 613–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidhaas, D. E., Schmidt, C. H. & Chamberlain, W. F. (1962). Research on radiation in insect control.—In Radioisotopes and radiation in entomology, pp. 257–263. Vienna, Int. Atom. Energy Ag.Google Scholar
Whiting, A. R. (1949). Androgenesis, a differentiator of cytoplasmic injury induced by X-rays in Habrobracon eggs.—Biol. Butt. Mar. biol. Lab., Wood's Hole 97 pp. 210–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed