Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:01:38.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on the control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferr.), with endosulfan in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

W. R. Ingram
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Uganda*

Extract

Three field trials with endosulfan against coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferr.), on both Coffea arabica and C. canephora are described. The insecticide was applied from motorized knapsack sprayers at 20 gal. per acre of an emulsified solution containing 0.2 per cent, active ingredient to the branches bearing the crop.

In two trials endosulfan applied twice at 21-day intervals significantly reduced the numbers of cherries containing living borers and the percentage of damaged cherries at the first pick. In the third trial a single application of endosulfan proved to be as effective as the double one. Increases in yield could not be detected. It was shown, by allowing insects to emerge from caged samples of cherries taken when picking began, that endosulfan did not affect the host/parasite ratio of either H. hampei or Geratitis coffeae (Bez.), nor did it increase the numbers of berry-boring caterpillars.

No off-flavours following treatment could be detected in liquoring trials of robusta coffee beans that were dry processed or pulped and washed.

Laboratory experiments in which adults of H. hampei were exposed above, but out of contact with, filter papers that had been dipped in an emulsified solution containing 0·2 per cent, endosulfan showed that it was acting at least as a partial fumigant and was more effective at 30°C. than at room temperature (21°C); spraying should thus preferably be carried out on warm, sunny days. In view of these findings, and as it is relatively non-toxic, endosulfan is recommended for control of H. hampei in Uganda when heavy attacks occur.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, P. R. & Cavalvante, R. D. (1964). Ensaro de campo com novas inseticidas orgânicos no combate à broca do café—Hypothenemus hampei (Ferr., 1867).—Archos. Inst. biol., S. Paulo 31 pp. 8590.Google Scholar
Bowden, J., McNutt, D. N. & Rennison, B. D. (1964). Effect of lindane on the liquor of arabica coffee as evaluated by different liquorers.—E. Afr. agric. For. J. 30 pp. 4045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drouillon, R. (1959). La leçon de deux campagnes de désinsectisation dans les plantations de caféiers de l'Oubangui-Chari.—Agron. trop. 14 pp. 198207.Google Scholar
da Fonseca Ferrão, A. (1960). A broca dos frutos do café, Stephanoderes hampei Ferr.—Gazeta agric. Angola 5 pp. 294296.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, H. (1926). Notes on the coffee berry-borer (Stephanoderes hampei, Ferr.) in Uganda.—Bull. ent. Res. 16 pp. 347354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, W. O. (1960). Experiêncas de campo para comparação do efeito de inseticidas modernos no combate à broca do café Hypothenemus hampei (Ferr. 1867) (Col., Ipidae).—Archos. Inst. biol., S. Paulo 27 pp. 1729.Google Scholar
Ingram, W. R. (1965). An evaluation of several insecticides against berry borer and fruit fly in Uganda robusta coffeeE. Afr. agric. For. J. 30 pp. 259262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, W. R., McNutt, D.N. & Davies, J. C. (in press). A note on some unintentional biological effects of insecticide application in Uganda.Google Scholar
Lepage, H. S. & Giannotti, O. (1950). Atividade de alguns inseticidas modernos sôbre à broca do café—Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari).—Archos. Inst. biol., S. Paulo 19 pp. 299308.Google Scholar
Piérrard, G. (1962). Efficacité du thiodan contre Stephanoderes hampei et Antestiopsis lineaticollis.—Bull. Inform. I. N. E. A. C. 11 pp. 5966.Google Scholar