Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:18:35.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the Reaction of the Breeding Places of Anophelines in Macedonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Helen Russell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The importance of the reaction of mosquito breeding water was established by MacGregor in 1921, and since then observations have been reported from various parts of the world. In the original paper MacGregor showed that, in the laboratory, three species of English mosquitos could survive an alkalinity of pH 9·6 and died in acid water of pH 4·4, while two other species developed in pH 4·4. Later, in Mauritius, he found the local Anophelines in water ranging from pH 9·5 to pH 8·4 and rarely in places giving the reading pH 7·4 ; and maintained that the reaction of any water there was a reliable index of the presence of Anopheline larvae. Senior White, in Ceylon, found the local Anophelines in water with readings from pH 5·8 to pH 8·6 usually, and decided that on the whole the local Culicines had a more restricted range. Buxton, in Palestine, found six species of Anopheles in water varying from pH 9·2 to pH 7·4, and of these only one occurred in water less alkaline than pH 8. He notes that Nablus, where the water supply is unusually acid for Palestine (pH 7 to 7·5), is free from malaria.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , December 1927 , pp. 155 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, W. R. G. (1923). “ The Hydrogen-ion Concentration of the Soil and Natural Waters in Relation to Diseases other than Bacterial.”—Parasitology, xv.Google Scholar
Atkins, W. R. G. & Harris, G. T. (1924). “ Seasonal Changes in the Water and Helioplankton of Fresh-water Ponds.”—Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc., xviii.Google Scholar
Balfour, A. (1921). “ Mosquito Breeding in Saline Waters.”—Bull. Ent. Res. xii.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1925). “ Applied Entomology of Palestine, being a Report to the Palestine Government.”—Bull. Ent. Res., xiv.Google Scholar
Home, H. “ Malaria Engineering.”Google Scholar
MacGregor, M. E. (1921). “ The Influence of Hydrogen-ion Concentration in the Development of Mosquito Larvae.”—Parasitology, xiii.Google Scholar
MacGregor, M. E. (1922). “ Report on the Anophelinae of Mauritius.”Google Scholar
Moore, Prideaux & Herdman, (1915). “ Studies of certain Photosynthetic Phenomena in Sea Water.”—Proc. & Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc., xxix.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, A. (1920). “ A Contribution to the Geography of Macedonia.”—Geographical Journal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, A. (1921). “ Physiography and Settlements in Southern Macedonia.”—Geographical Review, xi.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. T. (1921). “ A Note on the Hydrogen-ion Concentration of some Natural Waters.”—Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc.Google Scholar
Senior-White, R. (1925). “ Physical Factors in Mosquito Ecology.”—Bull. Ent. Res., xvi.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. B. (1926). “ Mosquito Researches.”—Malay Med. J., i.Google Scholar