Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:28:37.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the Biology of some predacious Mites on Fruit Trees in south-eastern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Elsie Collyer
Elsie Collyer
Affiliation:
East Malling Research Station.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A number of predacious mites of the PHYTOSEIINAE (family LAELAPTIDAE), found in south-eastern England, mostly in association with fruit trees, are listed. Certain measurements and other characters that are of value in separating species are given. The species found were: Typhlodromus tiliae Oudm., T. cucumeris Oudm., T. tiliarum Oudm., T. rhenanus (Oudm.), T. finlandicus (Oudm.), T. umbraticus Chant, T. massei Nesbitt, T. vitis Oudm., T. soleiger (Ribaga), Phytoseius macropilis (Banks) and two Amblyseius spp. Of these, T. tiliae, T. finlandicus and P. macropilis are normally abundant on apple trees, but only T. tiliae remains abundant on commercially-grown apple trees. For each species a list of plants on which it has been found is given.

Details of the life-history of laboratory-reared mites are given and these, together with counts of field populations, show that three generations a year is normal.

Predacious phytoseiine mites feed on several species of TETRANYCHIDAE, including Metatetranychus ulmi (Koch) and Tetranychus telarius (L.); when M. ulmi is supplied in adequate numbers, adults of T. tiliae consume 3 mites per day, the nymphs 2 mites per day, on an average. It is thought that they also feed on plant tissue, since individuals survived in the laboratory for a considerable length of time in the absence of phytophagous mites, though eggs were not laid.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , July 1956 , pp. 205 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chant, D. A. (1956). Some mites of the subfamily Pkytoseiinae (Acarina: Laelaptidae) from southeastern England, with descriptions of new species.—Canad. Ent., 88, pp. 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, D. W. & Pollard, H. N. (1952). The effect of DDT on mite and predator populations in apple orchards.—J. econ. Ent., 15, pp. 108–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collyer, E. (1953). Biology of some predatory insects and mites associated with the Fruit Tree Red Spider Mite (Metatetranychus ulmi (Koch)) in southeastern England. IV. The predator-mite relationship.—J. hort. Sci., 28, pp. 246–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collyer, E. & Kirby, A. H. M. (1955). Some factors affecting the balance of phytophagous and predacious mites on apple in south-east England.—J. hort. Sci., 30, pp. 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, F. & Baker, E. W. (1953). A guide to the predatory Phytoseiid mites of the United States.—Publ. Pinellas biol. Lab., no. 1, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Cutright, C. E. (1944). Populations of the European Red Mite as affected by spray schedules.—J. econ. Ent., 37, pp. 499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, H. A. (1953). Spider mites of Citrus and Texas Citrus Mite control in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas.—J. econ. Ent., 45, pp. 1051–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. O. (1952). A new Typhlodromid mite predacious on Tetranychus bimaculatus Harvey in Indonesia.—Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (12) 5, pp. 413–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1914). The Common Red Spider or Spider Mite.—Bull. Ore. agric. Exp. Sta., no. 121, 95 pp.Google Scholar
Fleschner, C. A. & Ricker, D. W. (1954). Typhlodromid mites on Citrus and avocado trees in southern California.—J. econ. Ent., 47, pp. 356–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garman, P. (1948). Mite species from apple trees in Connecticut.—Bull. Conn. agric. Exp. Sta., no. 520, 27 pp.Google Scholar
Geijskes, D. C. (1939). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der europäischen Spinnmilben (Acari, Tetranychidae), mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der niederlandischen Arten.—Meded. LandbHoogesch. Wageningen, 42, no. 4, 68 pp.Google Scholar
Gilliatt, F. C. (1935). Some predators of the European Red Mite, Paratetranychus pilosus C. & F., in Nova Scotia.—Canad. J. Res., (D) 13, pp. 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, H. J. [1953]. Progress report on predacious mite investigations in Nova Scotia (Acarina: Phytoseiidae).—Rep. ent. Soc. Ont., 83, pp. 27–29.Google Scholar
Kuenen, D. J. (1947). On the ecological significance of two predators of Metatetranychus ulmi C. L. Koch (Acari, Tetranychidae).—Tijdschr. Ent., 88, pp. 303–312.Google Scholar
Lord, F. T. (1949–50). The influence of spray programs on the fauna of apple orchards in Nova Scotia. III. Mites and their predators.—Canad. Ent., 81, pp. 202–214, 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGill, E. I. (1939). A Gamasid mite (Typhlodromus thripsi n. sp.), a predator of Thrips tabaci Lind.—Ann. appl. Biol., 26, pp. 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, H. H. J. (1951). A taxonomic study of the Phytoseiinae (family Laelaptidae) predaceous upon Tetranychidae of economic importance.—Zool. Verh., no. 12, 64 pp.Google Scholar
Newcomer, E. J. & Yothers, M. A. (1929). Biology of the European Red Mite in the Pacific Northwest.—Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 89, 69 pp.Google Scholar
Parrott, P. J., Hodgkiss, H. E. & Schoene, W. J. (1906). The Apple and Pear Mites.—Bull. N.Y. agric. Exp. Sta., no. 283, pp. 281–318.Google Scholar
Putman, W. L. (1942). Notes on the predaceous thrips, Haplothrips subtilissimus Hal. and Aeolothrips melaleucus Hal.—Canad. Ent., 75, pp. 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Womersley, H. (1954). Species of the subfamily Phytoseiinae (Acarina: Laelaptidae) from Australia.—Aust. J. Zool., 2, pp. 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar