Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:44:50.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘new taxonomy’ - does it require new taxonomists or a new understanding?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Richard P. Lane
Richard P. Lane*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, U.K
*
Correspondence is encouraged and should be addressed to the editors.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Guest Editorial
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 82 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 437 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Danks, H.V. (1988) Systematics in support of entomology. Annual Review of Entomology 33, 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K.J. & May, R.M. (1992) Taxonomy of taxonomists. Nature 356, 281–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, H. (1992) Peers slam peer review. Nature 355, 488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P.H. (1991) The state of systematics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (1992) Systematic Biology Research. 106 pp. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London.Google Scholar
Law, J.H., Riberio, J.M.C. & Wells, M.A. (1992) Biochemical insights derived from insect diversity. Annual Review of Biochemistry 61, 87–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linnean Society (1992) An apprisal of Taxonomy in the 1990's. 49 pp. London.Google Scholar
Natural Environment Research Council (1992) Evolution and Biodiversity—The New Taxonomy. 44 pp. Swindon, UK.Google Scholar
Tyndale-Biscoe, H. (Ed.) (1992) Australia's biota and the national interest. The role of biological collections. Australian Biologist 5, 1–106.Google Scholar
Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, P.H. (1991) What to protect?—systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar