Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:40:59.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natality, mortality and control of the elm bark beetle Scolytus scolytus (F.) (Col., Scolytidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. A. Beaver
R. A. Beaver
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Caernarvonshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Natality is more important than mortality in the determination of the number of first-generation adults of Scolytus scolytus (F.) to emerge. The reverse is the case for the overwintering generation. Temperature is a probable key factor for the first generation, and subcortical predators for the overwintering generation. These results are related to possible control of the beetle as a vector of Dutch elm disease by injection of systemic insecticides. It is suggested that control measures may only be necessary in the climatic conditions of the United Kingdom in hot summers when a large first generation is likely to emerge. Natural mortality factors will effectively reduce the beetle population that overwinters.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , December 1969 , pp. 537 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaver, R. A. (1966). The development and expression of population tables for the bark beetle Scolytus scolytus (F.).—J. Anim. Ecol. 35, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, R. A. (1967 a). The regulation of population density in the bark beetle Scolytus scolytus (F.).—J. Anim. Ecol. 36, 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, R. A. (1967 b). Hymenoptera associated with elm bark beetles in Wytham Wood, Berks.—Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 17, 141–150.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. (1959). Single-factor analysis in population dynamics.—Ecology 40, 580–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, D. M. jr (1960). Systemic insecticidal action in the cortical tissues of elm twigs.—J. econ. Ent. 53, 1034–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, D. M. (1967). Systemic insecticides in trees.—A. Rev. Ent. 12, 127–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peace, T. R. (1960). The status and development of elm disease in Britain.—Bull. For. Commn, Lond. no. 33, 44 pp.Google Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. (1962). Ecology of Scolytidae.—A. Rev. Ent. 7, 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. (1967). The interpretation of population change.—J. Anim. Ecol. 36, 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar