Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:27:29.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiple mating by females of two Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2009

A. Chinajariyawong ,
R.A.I. Drew ,
A. Meats ,
S. Balagawi  and
S. Vijaysegaran
A. Chinajariyawong
Affiliation:
Institute of Agriculture Technology, Walailak University, Thasala, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand
R.A.I. Drew*
Affiliation:
International Centre for the Management of Pest Fruit Flies, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan QLD 4111, Australia
A. Meats
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences A12, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
S. Balagawi
Affiliation:
International Centre for the Management of Pest Fruit Flies, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan QLD 4111, Australia
S. Vijaysegaran
Affiliation:
International Centre for the Management of Pest Fruit Flies, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan QLD 4111, Australia
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +61 7 3735 3697 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Multiple mating was investigated in two tephritid species when females were under minimal male pressure because they were each confined with a single male in cages 20×20×20 cm and observed daily until they died. Laboratory-reared females of Bactrocera cucumis (French) lived up to 274 days and refractory periods averaged 59–63 days. However, the distribution of matings among B. cucumis females was not significantly different to that expected by chance. Wild females of Bactrocera cacuminata (Hering) reared from field-collected fruits of Solanum mauritianum Scopoli lived for up to 134 days and mated up to three times with refractory periods between matings averaging 27–39 days. The distribution of the number of matings among females of B. cacuminata was non-random because of the high proportion of non-maters (50%); but, when only females mating more than once were considered, there was no significant departure from random expectation.

Keywords

refractory periodBactrocera cacuminataBactrocera cucumisSIT
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , June 2010 , pp. 325 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arita, L.H. & Kaneshiro, K.Y. (1989) Sexual selection and lek behavior in the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pacific Science 43, 135–143.Google Scholar
Arnqvist, G. & Nilsson, T. (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60, 145–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashburner, M. (1989) Drosophila. A laboratory Handbook. 1331 pp. Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, B.N. (2007) Privatizing the SIT: a conflict between business and technology? pp. 449–456in Vreysen, M.J.B., Robinson, A.S. & Hendrichs, J. (Eds) Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P. (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. 826 pp. London UK, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bradbury, J.W. & Andersson, M.B. (Eds) (1987) Sexual Selection: Testing of Alternatives. 308 pp. Chichester, UK, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Chapman, T., Miyatake, T., Smith, H.K. & Partridge, L. (1998) Interactions of mating, egg production and death rates in Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata females. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 265, 1879–1894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C.F. (1985) Genetic control of insect pests: growth industry or lead balloon? Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 26, 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, R.A.I. (1989) The tropical fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) of the Australasian and Oceanian regions. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 26, 1–521.Google Scholar
Drew, R.A.I., Courtice, A.C. & Teakle, D.S. (1983) Bacteria as a natural source of food for adult fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Oecologia 60, 274–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, H.A.C. & Meats, A. (1983) The influence of age, ambient temperature, thermal history and mating history on mating frequency in males of the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni. Entomologia Experimentalis et applicata 34, 273–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitt, G.P. (1986) The roles of adult and larval specialisations in limiting the occurrence of five species of Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in cultivated fruits. Oecologia 69, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, B.S. & Giannakakis, A. (1973) Factors limiting the response of the females of the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni, to the sex pheromone of the male. Journal of Insect Physiology 19, 1147–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focardi, S. & Tinelli, A. (1996) May random processes explain mating success in leks? Behavioural Processes 36, 227–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedl, T.W.P. & Klump, G.M. (2005) Sexual selection in the lek-breeding European tree frog: body size, chorus attendance, random mating and good genes. Animal Behaviour 70, 1141–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershman, S.N. (2007) Female Gryllus vocalis field crickets gain diminishing returns from increasing numbers of matings. Ethology 113, 1099–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmer, A.M.T., Radhakrishnan, P. & Taylor, P.W. (2006) Remating inhibition in female Queensland fruit flies: Effects and correlates of sperm storage. Journal of Insect Physiology 52, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartley, I.R. & Shepherd, M.A. (1995) Random female settlement model can explain polygyny in the Corn Bunting. Animal Behaviour 49, 1111–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helsinki, M.E.H., Hood, R.C. & Knols, B.G.J. (2008) A stable isotope dual-labelling approach to detect multiple insemination in un-irradiated and irradiated Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes. Parasitic Vectors 1, 1–9.Google Scholar
Ivy, T.M. & Sakaluk, S.K. (2005) Polyandry promotes enhanced offspring survival in decorated crickets. Evolution 59, 152–159.Google ScholarPubMed
Kraaijeveld, K. & Chapman, T. (2004) Effects of male sterility on female remating in the Mediterranean fruitfly, Ceratitis capitata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B (Suppl.) 271, S209–S211.Google ScholarPubMed
Kraaijeveld, K., Katsoyannos, B.I., Stavrinides, M., Kouloussis, N.A. & Chapman, T. (2005) Remating in wild females of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Animal Behaviour 69, 771–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuba, H. & Itô, Y. (1993) Remating inhibition in the melon fly, Bactrocera (Dacus) cucurbitae (Diptera, Tephritidae) – copulation with spermless males inhibits female remating. Journal of Ethology 11, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landolt, P.J. (1994) Mating frequency of the papaya fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) with and without host fruit. Florida Entomologist 77, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meats, A. & Fay, H.A.C. (2000) Distribution of mating frequency among males of the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni, in relation to temperature, acclimation and chance. General & Applied Entomology 9, 27–30.Google Scholar
Meats, A. (2006) Attributes pertinent to over-wintering potential do not explain why Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae) does not spread further south within the geographical range of B. tryoni (Froggatt). Australian Journal of Entomology 45, 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossinson, S. & Yuval, B. (2003) Regulation of sexual receptivity of female Mediterranean fruit flies: old hypotheses revisited and a new synthesis proposed. Journal of Insect Physiology 49, 561–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, N. & Meats, A. (2002) The potential for mating between Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and B. neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Australian Journal of Entomology 41, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J. & Roitberg, B.D. (1984) Foraging behavior of true fruit flies. American Scientist 72, 41–49.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., Poramarcom, R., Sutantawong, M., Dokmaihom, R. & Hendrichs, J. (1996) Localization of mating behavior of released Bactrocera dorsalis flies on host fruit in an orchard. Journal of Insect Behavior 9, 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radhakrishnan, P. & Taylor, P.W. (2007) Seminal fluids mediate sexual inhibition and short copula duration in mated female Queensland fruit flies. Journal of Insect Physiology 53, 741–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radhakrishnan, P. & Taylor, P.W. (2008) Ability of male Queensland fruit flies to inhibit receptivity in multiple mates, and the associated recovery of accessory glands. Journal of Insect Physiology 54, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridley, M. (1988) Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biological Reviews 63, 509–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robacker, D.C., Ingle, S.J. & Hart, W.G. (1985) Mating frequency and response to male-produced pheromone by virgin and mated females of the Mexican fruit fly. The Southwestern Entomologist 10, 215–221.Google Scholar
Robinson, A.S., Cayol, J.P. & Hendrichs, J. (2002) Recent findings on Medfly sexual behavior: Implications for SIT. Florida Entomologist 85, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seslija, D., Marecko, I. & Tucic, N. (2008) Sexual selection and senescence: do seed beetle males (Acanthoscelides obtectus, Bruchidae, Coleoptera) shape the longevity of their mates? Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 46, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivinski, J. (1984) Effect of sexual experience on male mating success in a lek forming tephritid Anastrepha suspensa. Florida Entomologist 67, 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, B.F. & Gowaty, P.A. (2007) A reappraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution 61, 2457–2468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd edn.887 pp. New York, USA, WH Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Song, S.D., Drew, R.A.I. & Hughes, J.M. (2007) Multiple paternity in a natural population of a wild tobacco fly, Bactrocera cacuminata (Diptera: Tephritidae), assessed by microsatellite DNA markers. Molecular Ecology 16, 2353–2361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, W.J. (1985) Chance can induce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Animal Behaviour 33, 1341–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaine, G., Corcoran, R.J. & Davey, M. (1978) Commodity treatment against infestations of the cucumber fly Dacus (Austrodacus) cucumis French, in cucumbers. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences 35, 5–9.Google Scholar
Takai, K., Kanda, T., Oguma, Y., Cheong, W.H., Joesoef, A.M. & Sucharit, S. (1984) Postmating reproductive isolation between 7 members of the Anopheles hyrcanus species group in East Asia. Japanese Journal of Sanitary Zoology 35, 251–259Google Scholar
Taylor, D.B. & Craig, G.B. (1985) Unidirectional reproductive incompatibility between Aedes berlandi and Aedes hendersoni (Diptera: Culicidae) Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78, 769–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripet, F., Touré, Y.T., Dolo, G. & Lanzaro, G.C. (2003) Frequency of multiple inseminations in field-collected Anopheles gambiae females revealed by DNA analysis of transferred sperm. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 68, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tychsen, P.H. & Fletcher, B.S. (1971) Studies on the rhythm of mating in the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni. Journal of Insect Physiology 17, 2139–2156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tychsen, P.H. (1977) Mating behaviour of the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae) in field cages. Journal Australian Entomological Society 16, 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vera, M.T., Wood, R.J., Cladera, J.L. & Gilburn, A.S. (2002) Factors affecting female remating frequency in the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomologist 85, 156–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, Y., Xu, Z., Huang, R. & Zhao, X. (1992). Hybridization experiments using Anopheles minimus from Guangxi and Yunnan. Chinese Journal of Parasitology & Parasitic Diseases 10, 287–289.Google ScholarPubMed