Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T10:38:17.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Movement and impact of Trichogrammatoidea cryptophlebiae Nagaraja (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in citrus orchards after inundative releases against the false codling moth, Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Philip J. Newton
Philip J. Newton
Affiliation:
Citrus and Subtropical Fruit Research Institute, Private Bag X11208, Nelspruit, 1200, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inundative releases of the indigenous egg parasitoid Trichogrammatoidea cryptophlebiae Nagaraja were made against Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyrick) in two sweet orange orchards in the Transvaal lowveld, South Africa. The rate of parasitism was raised to similar levels in the two release areas, but there was a significant decrease in crop damage in only one of them. Although the larval population was twice as large in a control orchard, the losses there were compensated for by a larger total crop. Three explanations for the different performances of the parasitoids are examined. Movement away from release areas was not apparent. Rates of parasitism at the tops or bottoms of trees or at the four cardinal aspects were not significantly different overall but should have been to compensate for the linear increase in numbers of host eggs with height, and the larger numbers on the warmer northern and eastern sides of trees. Parasitism was higher at the tree tops than at the bottoms in the orchard that lost the least fruit. The stochastic processes governing host-egg distribution on fruit were also important. Pest density was higher in the release areas than the control, and eggs were distributed more contagiously in the orchard with the most crop loss.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , March 1988 , pp. 85 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedford, E. C. G., Vercueil, S. W. & Deacon, V. (1985). A general guide to the integrated control of citrus pests with red scale under biological control.—Fmg S. Afr., Leafl. Ser., Citrus H. 47, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Catling, H. D. & Aschenborn, H. (1974). Population studies of the false codling moth, Cryptophlebia leucotreta Meyr., on citrus in the Transvaal.—Phytophylactica 6, 31–37.Google Scholar
CIBC (Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control) (1984). Possibilities for the biological control of the false codling moth, Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Lep., Tortricidae).—Biocontrol News and Information 5, 217–220.Google Scholar
CIE (Commonwealth Institute of Entomology) (1976). Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyr.).—Distrib. Maps Insect Pests no. 352.Google Scholar
Keller, M. A. & Lewis, W. J. (1985). Movements by Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera:Trichogrammatidae) released into cotton.—Southwestern Entomologist Suppl. 8, 99–109.Google Scholar
Newton, P. J., Anderson, T. & Vercueil, S. W. (1986). Crop losses due to false codling moth, Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyr.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), on citrus in South Africa from 1983 to 1985.—Subtropica 7, 10–12.Google Scholar
Newton, P. J. (in press). Inversely density dependent egg parasitism in patchy distributions of the citrus pest Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyr.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and its agricultural efficiency.—J. appl. Ecol.Google Scholar
Oatman, E. R. & Platner, G. R. (1985). Biological control of two avocado pests.—Calif. Agric. 39, (11-12) 21–23.Google Scholar
Reed, W. (1974). The false codling moth, Cryptophlebia leucotreta Meyr. (Lepidoptera:Olethreutidae) as a pest of cotton in Uganda.—Cott. Grow. Rev. 51, 213–225.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. (1972). Population explosion of false codling moths.—Citrus Grower and Sub-Tropical Fruit Journal no. 466, 5, 7, 9, 24.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. (1977). 'n Tegniek vir die massateling van die eierparasiet Trichogrammatoidea luteum Girault, op die eiers van valskodlingmot.—Citrus and Subtropical Fruit Journal no. 526, 5–7.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. (1980). Eier-parasiet van valskodlingmot: evaluasie van 'n teel- en vrylaatprogram.—Citrus and Subtropical Fruit Journal no. 554, 6–8.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. (1981). 'n Bydrae tot die biologie en beheer van die valskodlingmot Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyr.) (Lepidoptera: Eucosmidae) op Nawels.—Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A., Marais, A. & Van Der Kooij, R. (1982). Beheer van valskodlingmot in Citrusdal deur grootskaalse vrylating van 'n eierparasiet.—Subtropica 3, 17–20.Google Scholar
Yu, D. S. K., Laing, J. E. & Hagley, E. A. C. (1984). Dispersal of Trichogramma spp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in an apple orchard after inundative releases.—Environ. Entomol. 13, 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar