Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T18:05:03.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological and fecundity traits of Culex mosquitoes caught in gravid traps in urban and rural Berkshire, UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2015

S. Townroe
Affiliation:
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Harborne Building, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AS, UK
A. Callaghan*
Affiliation:
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Harborne Building, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AS, UK
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +44 0118 378 4428 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Culex pipiens s.l. is one of the primary vectors of West Nile Virus in the USA and Continental Europe. The seasonal abundance and eco-behavioural characteristics of the typical form, Cx. pipiens pipiens, make it a key putative vector in Britain. Surveillance of Culex larvae and adults is essential to detect any changes to spatial and seasonal activity or morphological traits that may increase the risk of disease transmission. Here we report the use of the modified Reiter gravid box trap, which is commonly used in the USA but scarcely used in the UK, to assess its suitability as a tool for British female Culex mosquito surveillance. Trapping was carried out at 110 sites in urban and rural gardens in Berkshire in May, July and September 2013. We tested if reproductively active adult female Culex are more abundant in urban than rural gardens and if wing characteristic traits and egg raft size are influenced by location and seasonal variations. Gravid traps were highly selective for Culex mosquitoes, on average catching significantly more per trap in urban gardens (32.4 ± 6.2) than rural gardens (19.3 ± 4.0) and more in July than in May or September. The majority of females were caught alive in a good condition. Wing lengths were measured as an indicator of size. Females flying in September were significantly smaller than females in May or July. Further non-significant differences in morphology and fecundity between urban and rural populations were found that should be explored further across the seasons.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, P., Haussy, C. & Michalakis, Y. (2000) Effects of density and larval competition on selected life history traits of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 37, 732735.Google Scholar
Allan, S.A. & Kline, D. (2004) Evaluation of various attributes of gravid female traps for collection of Culex in Florida. Journal of Vector Ecology 29, 285294.Google ScholarPubMed
Armbruster, P. & Hutchinson, R.A. (2002) Pupal mass and wing length as indicators of fecundity in Aedes albopictus and Aedes geniculatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 39, 699704.Google Scholar
Briegel, H. & Timmermann, S.E. (2001) Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae): physiological aspects of development and reproduction. Journal of Medical Entomology 38, 566571.Google Scholar
Chaves, L.F., Keogh, C.L., Nguyen, A.M., Decker, G.M., Vazquez-Prokopec, G.M. & Kitron, U.D. (2010) Combined sewage overflow accelerates immature development and increases body size in the urban mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus . Journal of Applied Entomology, 110.Google Scholar
Cranston, P.S., Ramsdale, C.D., Snow, K.R. & White, G.B. (1987) Adults, Larvae and Pupae of British Mosquitoes (Culicidae) A Key, SP48; 142 pp. Freshwater Biological Association, Available at: https://www.fba.org.uk/shop/product_info.php/products_id/47.Google Scholar
Crawley, M.J. (2009) The R book Chichester. England, Wiley.Google Scholar
Fonseca, D.M., Keyghobadi, N., Malcolm, C.A., Mehmet, C., Schaffner, F., Mogi, M., Fleischer, R.C. & Wilkerson, R.C. (2004) Emerging vectors in the Culex pipiens complex. Science 303, 15351538.Google Scholar
Golding, N., Nunn, M., Medlock, J.M., Purse, B.V., Vaux, A.G.C. & Schäfer, S.M. (2012) West Nile virus vector Culex modestus established in southern England. Parasites and Vectors 5, 15.Google Scholar
Hubalek, Z. & Halouzka, J. (1999) West Nile fever- a remerging mosquito-borne viral disease in Europe. Emerging Infectious Diseases 5, 643650.Google Scholar
Juliano, S.A., Sylvestre Ribeiro, G., Maciel-de-Freitas, R., Castro, M.G., Codeço, C., Lourenco-de-Oliveira, R. & Lounibos, P. (2014) She's a femme fatale: low-density larval development produces good disease vectors. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 109, 96103.Google Scholar
L'Ambert, G., Ferré, J.-B., Schaffner, F. & Fontenille, D. (2012) Comparison of different trapping methods for surveillance of mosquito vectors of West Nile virus in Rhône Delta, France. Journal of Vector Ecology 37, 269275.Google Scholar
Leisnham, P.T., Lester, P.J., Slaney, D.P. & Weinstein, P. (2006) Relationships between mosquito densities in artificial container habitats, land use and temperature in the Kapiti-Horowhenua region, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 40, 285297.Google Scholar
Medlock, J.M., Snow, K.R. & Leach, S. (2005) Potential transmission of West Nile virus in the British Isles: an ecological review of candidate mosquito bridge vectors. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 19, 221.Google Scholar
Medlock, J.M., Vaux, A.G.C., Gibson, G., Hawkes, F.M. & Cheke, R.A. (2014) Potential vector for West Nile virus prevalent in Kent. Veterinary Record 175, 284285.Google Scholar
Mpho, M., Callaghan, A. & Holloway, G.J. (2002) Temperature and genotypic effects on life history and fluctuating asymmetry in a field strain of Culex pipiens . Heredity 88, 307312.Google Scholar
Nasci, R.S. (1990) Relationship of wing length to adult dry weight in several mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 27, 716719.Google Scholar
Patz, J.A., Graczyk, T.K., Geller, N. & Vittor, A.Y. (2000) Effects of environmental change on emerging parasitic diseases. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 13951405.Google Scholar
R-Core-Team (2012) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Reisen, W.K., Milby, M.M. & Bock, M.E. (1984) The effects of immature stress on selected events in the life history of Culex tarsalis . Mosquito News 44, 385395.Google Scholar
Reisen, W.K., Thiemann, T., Barker, C.M., Lu, H., Carroll, B., Fang, Y. & Lothrop, H.D. (2010) Effects of warm winter temperature on the abundance and gonotrophic activity of Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) in California. Journal of Medical Entomology 47, 230237.Google Scholar
Reiter, P. (1987) A revised version of the CDC gravid mosquito trap. Jounral of American Mosquito Control Association, 325327.Google Scholar
Rudolph, M., Czajka, C., Borstler, J., Melaun, C., Jost, H., von Thien, H., Badusche, M., Becker, N., Schmidt-Chanasit, J., Kruger, A., Tannich, E. & Becker, S. (2013) First nationwide surveillance of Culex pipiens complex and Culex torrentium mosquitoes demonstrated the presence of Culex pipiens Biotype pipiens/molestus Hybrids in Germany. PLoS ONE 8, e71832.Google Scholar
Snow, K. & Medlock, J. (2006) The potential impact of climate change on the distribution and prevalence of mosquitoes in Britain. Journal of the European Mosquito Control Association 21, 110.Google Scholar
Snow, K. & Medlock, J.M. (2008) The mosquitoes of Epping Forest, Essex, UK. European Mosquito Bulletin 26, 917.Google Scholar
Styer, L.M., Meola, M.A. & Kramer, L.D. (2007) West Nile Virus infection decreases fecundity of Culex tarsalis females. Journal of Medical Entomology 44, 10741085.Google Scholar
Townroe, S. & Callaghan, A. (2014) British container breeding mosquitoes: the impact of urbanisation and climate change on community composition and phenology. PLoS ONE 9, e95325.Google Scholar
Vaux, A.G.C., Gibson, G., Hernandez-Triana, L.M., Cheke, R.A., McCracken, F., Jeffries, C.L., Horton, D.L., Springate, S., Johnson, N., Fooks, A.R., Leach, S. & Medlock, J.M. (2015) Enhanced West Nile virus surveillance in the North Kent marshes, UK. Parasites and Vectors 8, 705.Google Scholar
Williams, G.M. & Gingrich, J.B. (2007) Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance. Journal of Vector Ecology 32, 285291.Google Scholar