Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:07:13.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monitoring of endosulfan and lindane resistance in the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in New Caledonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

L.O. Brun
Affiliation:
Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement en Coopération (ORSTOM) Nouméa, New Caledonia
C. Marcillaud
Affiliation:
Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement en Coopération (ORSTOM) Nouméa, New Caledonia
V. Gaudichon
Affiliation:
Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement en Coopération (ORSTOM) Nouméa, New Caledonia
D.M. Suckling
Affiliation:
DSIR Plant Protection, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Christchurch, New Zealand

Abstract

Endosulfan resistance in the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) was discovered in New Caledonia after six years of lindane and 12 years of endosulfan biannual applications. The direct spray technique was used to study cross resistance with lindane and to monitor resistance to both pesticides in 15 regions of New Caledonia. An easier monitoring technique was developed for early detection by field laboratories. Results from this simple method, using twice the LC99 of endosulfan to susceptibles (400 ppm) showed a comparable distribution of resistance to the direct spray method in five regions where resistance was detected. The percentage of surveyed fields containing resistant insects in these areas was: Poindimié, 100%, Ponérihouen, 97%; Touho, 63%; Houailou, 10%; Hienghène, 6%. Resistant insects were significantly more frequent in the new sunny fields than in older shady plantations (P<0.05), and fields with endosulfan used in the preceding year (P<0.001). The possible reasons for the observed distribution of resistance are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brun, L.O., Marcillaud, C., Gaudichon, V. & Suckling, D.M. (1989) Endosulfan resistance in coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in New Caledonia. Journal of Economic Entomology 82, 13111316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brun, L.O., Gaudichon, V. & Marcillaud, C.Provisional method for detecting endosulfan resistance in coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). FAO Plant Protection Bulletin 37 (in press)Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (1980) Recommended methods for measurements of pesticides. Methods for adults of some major pests of stored cereals with malathion or lindane. Method No. 15. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin 21, 7789.Google Scholar
Knauf, W. (1982) Effect of endosulfan and its metabolities on arthropods. Residue Reviews 83, 89112.Google Scholar
Le Pelley, R.H. (1968) Pests of coffee. Longmans, Green & Co. London.Google Scholar
Potter, C. (1952) An improved, laboratory apparatus for applied direct spray and surface film, with data on the electrostatic charge on atomised spray fluids. Annals of Applied Biology 39, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J.L., Russell, R.M. & Savin, N.A. (1980) POLO: a user's guide to probit or logit analysis. Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS (1985) SAS user's guide: statistics. Version 5 Edition. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Suckling, D.M. & Brun, L.O. (1989) Rapid change in endosulfan resistance frequency in coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) across coffee fields sprayed from roadsides in New Caledonia. Abstract only. 1st Asia-Pacific Conference of Entomology, November 8–13 1989, Chaing Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar