Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:27:57.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Larval diet affects number of femoral ‘brush’ scales in male Helicoverpa punctigera moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Nurindah ,
G.H. Walter  and
R.L. Tiongson
Nurindah
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Entomology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
G.H. Walter*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Entomology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
R.L. Tiongson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Entomology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
*
*Fax: (61 7) 3365 1922 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Males of Helicoverpa punctigera (Wallengren) show considerable variation in the number of femoral scales on the prothoracic legs. Such intraspecific variation in adult morphology could indicate the presence of undetected sibling species, or it may be related to larval diet. Helicoverpa punctigera is polyphagous, and different host plant species are likely to represent diets of different quality. Femoral lengths and the numbers of femoral scales on the prothoracic legs were therefore determined from: (i) individuals that had been collected as larvae from various host in the field; and (ii) individuals that had been laboratory-reared, in split-family tests, on different diets, namely cotton, lucerne, sowthistle and artificial diet. Host plant species (and therefore presumably diet quality) influenced femoral length of H. punctigera males perhaps in conjunction with this, the number of femoral scales on the fore leg. The rearing experiment indicated, in addition, that the effect of host plant quality varies with larval stage, and that the pattern of this variation across the immature stages is dependent on host plant species. recorded variation in the morphology of field-collected H. punctigera males is therefore most readily explained as a consequence of different individuals developing (at least for most of their larval life) on different host plant species, with diet quality varying significantly species. The relevance of these results for insect developmental studies and evolutionary interpretations of host relationships is outlined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 91 , Issue 5 , October 2001 , pp. 355 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alder, H.L. & Roessler, E.B. (1972) Introduction to probability and statistics. 365 pp. San Francisco, Freeman.Google Scholar
Bernays, E. (1986) Diet-induced head allometry among foliage-chewing insects and its importance for graminivores. Science 231, 495–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cesaroni, D. & Allegrucci, G. (1989) Allozymic and morphometric analysis of populations in the Zygaena purpuralis complex (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 36, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, M.F. & Morgan, J.C. (1993) Geographical variation in acoustic signals of the planthopper, Nilaparvata bakeri (Muir), in Asia: species recognition and sexual selection. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 48, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, M.F., den Hollander, J. & Morgan, J.C. (1988) Variation in host plant relations and courtship signals of weed-associated populations of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal), from Australia and Asia: a test of the recognition concept. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 35, 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common, I.F.B. (1953) The Australian species of Heliothis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and their pest status. Australian Journal of Zoology 1, 319–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, E. (1989) A diet-induced developmental polymorphism in a caterpillar. Science 243, 643–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, E. (1996) Effect of light quality and larval diet on morph induction in the polymorphic caterpillar Nemoria arizonaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58, 277–285.Google Scholar
Gu, H. & Walter, G.H. (1999) Is the common sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) a primary host plant of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lep., Noctuidae)? Oviposition and larval performance. Journal of Applied Entomology 123, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, D.F. (1965) The corn earworm complex. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 40, 1–247.Google Scholar
Held, L.I. (1979) Pattern as a function of cell number and cell size on the second-leg basitarsus of Drosophila. Wilhelm Roux's Archives 187, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, L.I. (1995) Axes, boundaries and coordinates: the ABCs of fly leg development. Bioessays 17, 721–732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janzon, L. (1986) Morphometric studies of some Pteromalus Swederus species (Hymneoptera: Chalcidoidea) with emphasis on allometric relationships, or: are ratios reliable in chalcid taxonomy? Systematic Entomology 11, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, R.J., Miethke, P.M. & Mahon, J.A. (1982) The evolutionary relationships of three forms of the jarrah leaf miner, Perthida glyphopa (Common) (Lepidoptera: Incurvariidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 30, 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, M. (1999) Heliothine moths of Australia. A guide to pest bollworms and related noctuid groups. Collingwood, CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Mopper, S. & Strauss, S.Y. (1998) Genetic structure and local adaptation in natural insect populations. xix + 449 pp. New York, Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijhout, H.F. (1994). Insect hormones. 267 pp. Princeton, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, R.L. (1993) An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. 1051 pp. Belmont, Duxbury.Google Scholar
Paterson, H.E.H. (1991) The recognition of cryptic species among economically important insects. pp. 1–9 in Zalucki, M.P. (Ed.) Heliothis: research methods and prospects. New York, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Polavarapu, S., Davidson, J.A. & Miller, D.R. (2000) Life history of the Putnam scale, Diaspidiotus ancylus (Putnam) (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Diaspididae) on blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum, Ericaceae) in New Jersey, with a world list of scale insects on blueberries. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 102, 549–560.Google Scholar
Pungerl, N.B. (1986) Morphometric and electrophoretic study of Aphidius species (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) reared from a variety of aphid hosts. Systematic Entomology 11, 327–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, T.D. & Ross, E.M. (1983) Flora of south-eastern Queensland. Vol. 1. Brisbane, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Miscellaneous Publication 81020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, T.D. & Ross, E.M. (1986) Flora of south-eastern Queensland. Vol. 2. Brisbane, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Miscellaneous Publication QM 84007.Google Scholar
Statview. (1992) The ultimate integrated data analysis and presentation system. Berkeley, Abacus Concepts.Google Scholar
Teakle, R.E. & Jensen, J.M. (1985) Rearing Heliothis punctigera. pp. 313–322 in Singh, P & Moore, R.F. (Eds) Handbook of insect rearing Vol. II. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Terry, I., Bradley, J.R. & van Duyn, J.W. (1989) Establishment of early instar Heliothis zea on soybeans. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 51, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D.B. (1992) Consumption rates and the evolution of diet-induced plasticity in the head morphology of Melanoplus femurrubrum (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia 89, 204–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, J.W. & Franzmann, B.A. (1981) Lucerne insect pest management. Queensland Agricultural Journal 107, 2–5.Google Scholar
Verdyck, P. (1998) Genetic differentiation and speciation among four Phyllotreta species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 64, 463–476.Google Scholar
Via, S., GomulkiewiczR., de R., de, Jong, G., Scheiner, S.M., Schlichting, C.D. & van Tienderen, P. (1995) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10, 212–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walter, G.H. & Benfield, M.D. (1994) Temporal host plant use in three polyphagous Heliothinae with special reference to Helicoverpa punctigera (Wallengren) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera). Australian Journal of Ecology 19, 458–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T.C.R. (1993) The inadequate environment: nitrogen and the abundance of animals. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalucki, M.P., Daglish, G., Firempong, S. & Twine, P. (1986) The biology and ecology of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) and H. punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia: what do we know? Australian Journal of Zoology 34, 779–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalucki, M.P., Murray, D.A., Gregg, P.C., Fitt, G.F., Twine, P.H. & Jones, C. (1994) Ecology of Helicoverpa armigera and H. punctigera (Wallengren) in the inland of Australia: larval sampling and host plant relationships during winter and spring. Australian Journal of Ecology 42, 329–346.Google Scholar