Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:39:08.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory studies of Blattisocius keegani (Fox) (Acari: Ascidae) reared on eggs of navel orangeworm: potential for biological control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2010

H.Q. Thomas ,
F.G. Zalom  and
N.L. Nicola
H.Q. Thomas*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
F.G. Zalom
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
N.L. Nicola
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: 1(530) 752-1537 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Blattisocius keegani (Fox) is a predatory mite in the family Ascidae (Acari), noted for potential biological control of Coleopteran stored product pests. Performance of B. keegani on eggs of navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), was investigated. Mites completed development from egg to adult in 9.2±0.22 days at 25°C and 50–60% relative humidity, and in 6.33±0.29 days at 32.2°C, 30% relative humidity. Mites provisioned with three or five eggs consumed a median of 1.25 to 1.5 eggs, with a maximum of three eggs consumed over 24 h. Regression analyses indicated egg-laying by B. keegani was significantly correlated with the number of A. transitella eggs consumed, and female mites laid an average of 5.82±0.44 eggs over 72 h. Blattisocius keegani, developed on fresh and frozen eggs, laid significantly more eggs when provided with fresh eggs (F3,26=6.16, P=0.0026) and were able to develop on frozen Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs as an alternative host. Mites were equally fecund when fed eggs stored at 0° or −20°C. Provisioning of adult moth bodies in addition to egg prey items increased mite fecundity, although it was demonstrated that B. keegani are phoretic on adult moths as well. The results are the first experimental evidence of B. keegani as a predator of Lepidopteran eggs, as a phoretic species, and of their potential for biological control of navel orangeworm.

Keywords

Blattisocius keeganiAmyelois transitellabiological controlegg predationphoresy
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 101 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 499 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, P.S. (1967) Bionomics of Blattisocius keegani (Fox) (Acarina-Ascidae) a predator on eggs of pests of stored grains. Canadian Journal of Zoology 45, 1093–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beavers, J.B., Selhime, A.G. & Denmark, H.A. (1972) Predation by Blattisocius keegani (Acarina Blattisocidae) on egg masses of Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera Curculionidae) in laboratory. Journal of Economic Entomology 65, 1483–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chant, D.A. (1963) The subfamily Blattisocinae Garman (=Aceosejinae Evans) (Acarina: Blattisocidae Garman) (=Aceosejidae Baker and Wharton) in North America, with descriptions of new species. Canadian Journal of Zoology 41, 243–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobanoglu, S. (2008) Mites (Acari) associated with stored apricots in Malatya, Elazig and Izmir provinces of Turkey. Turkiye Entomoloji Dergisi 32, 3–20.Google Scholar
Collier, T. & Van Steenwyk, R. (2004) A critical evaluation of augmentative biological control. Biological Control 31, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darst, P.H. & King, E.W. (1969) Biology of Melichares tarsalis in association with Plodia interpunctella. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 62, 747–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellers, J.E. & Klein, A.M. (2009) Landscape context and management effects on an important insect pest and its natural enemies in almond. Biological control 51, 388–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, G.L. & Brinkman, D. (1967) Rearing navel orangeworm in laboratory. Journal of Economic Entomology 60, 1109–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, M.L. & Dreistadt, S.H. (1998) Natural Enemies Handbook: The Illustrated Guide to Biological Pest Control. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, U., Smile, R.L. & Ochoa, R. (2003) Mites (Acari) for Pest Control. Oxford, UK, Blackwell Sciences, Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, C.P. (1981) Laboratory studies on the role of an egg predator, Blattisocius tarsalis (Berlese) (Acari, Ascidae), in relation to the natural control of Ephestia cautella (Walker) (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) in warehouses. Bulletin of Entomological Research 71, 555–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, R.B., Walter, D.E. & Lindquist, E.E. (1998) Revision of the Australian Ascidae (Acarina : Mesostigmata). Invertebrate Taxonomy 12, 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, M.A., Cunningham, G.L. & Knutson, L. (Eds) (1983) Biological Control of Pests by Mites. Berkeley, CA, Regents of the University of California.Google Scholar
Hughes, A.M. (1976) The Mites of Stored Food and Houses. London, UK, Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.W. & Wilson, L.T. (1995) Integrated pest management: contributions of biological control to its implementation. pp. 7–24in Nechols, J.R., Andres, L.A., Beardsley, J.W., Goeden, R.D. & Jackson, C.G. (Eds) Biological Control in the Western United States. Oakland, CA, Regents of the University of California, Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Laing, J.E. & Knop, N.F. (1983) Potential use of predacious mites other than Phytoseiidae for biological control of orchard pests. pp. 28–35in Hoy, M.A., Cunningham, G.L. & Knutson, L. (Eds) Biological Control of Pests by Mites. Berkeley, CA, Regents of the University of California.Google Scholar
McMurtry, J.A. & Croft, B.A. (1997) Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their role in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 42, 291–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meals, D.W. & Caltagirone, L.E. (1995) Navel Orangeworm. pp. 196–198in Nechols, J.R., Andres, L.A., Beardsley, J.W., Goeden, R.D. & Jackson, C.G. (Eds) Biological Control in the Western United States. Oakland, CA, Regents of the University of California Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Mullen, J.D., Alston, J.M., Sumner, D.A., Kreith, M.T. & Kuminoff, N.V. (2005) The payoff to public investments in pest-management R&D: General issues and a case study emphasizing integrated pest management in California. Review of Agricultural Economics 27, 558–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, P.S. (1999) The impact of temperature on activity and consumption rate of moth eggs by Blattisocius tarsalis (Acari: Ascidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 23, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, P.S. (2001) Developmental time of Blattisocius tarsalis (Acari: Ascidae) at different temperatures. Experimental and Applied Acarology 25, 605–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, P.S. (2003) Predation by Blattisocius tarsalis (Berlese) (Acari: Ascidae) on eggs of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 39, 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parra-Pedrazzoli, A.L. & Leal, W.S. (2006) Sexual behavior of the navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Neotropical Entomology 35, 769–774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivard, I. (1960) A technique for individual rearing of the predaceous mite Melichares dentriticus (Berlese) (Acarina: Aceosejidae) with notes on its life history and behaviour. Canadian Entomologist 92, 834–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivard, I. (1962a) Influence of humidity on the predaceous mite Melichares dendriticus (Berlese) (Acarina-Aceosejidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 40, 761–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivard, I. (1962b) Some effects of prey density on survival, speed of development, and fecundity of the predaceous mite Melichares dendriticus (Berlese) (Acarine-Aceosejidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 40, 1233–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thind, B.B. & Ford, H.L. (2006) Laboratory studies on the use of two new arenas to evaluate the impact of the predatory mites Blattisocius tarsalis and Cheyletus eruditus on residual populations of the stored product mite Acarus siro. Experimental and Applied Acarology 38, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treat, A.E. (1966) A new Blattisocius (Acarina-Mesostigmata) from Noctuid moths. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 74, 143–159.Google Scholar
Treat, A.E. (1969) Association of mite Blattisocius tarsalis with moth Epizeuxis aemula. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 77, 171–175.Google Scholar
Treat, A.E. (Ed.) (1975) Mites of Moths and Butterflies. Ithaca, NY, Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
Wade, W.H. (1961) Biology of the navel orangeworm, Paramyelois transitella (Walker) on almonds and walnuts in northern California. Hilgardia 31, 129–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, G.K. & Gerson, U. (1994) The predator guild associated with Aceria-Litchii (Acari, Eriophyidae) in Australia and China. Entomophaga 39, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalom, F.G., Barnett, W.W. & Weakley, C.V. (1984) Efficacy of Winter Sanitation for Managing the Navel Orangeworm, Paramyelois-Transitella (Walker), in California Almond Orchards. Protection Ecology 7, 37–41.Google Scholar
Zalom, F.G., Pickel, C., Bentley, W.J., Haviland, D.R. & Van Steenwyk, R.A. (2009). UC IPM pest management guidelines: Almond. UC ANR Publication 3431. UC ANR.Google Scholar