Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:52:05.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory analyses of vision in tsetse flies (Dipt., Glossinidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. A. Turner  and
J. F. Invest
D. A. Turner
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St.London WC1E 7HT
J. F. Invest
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St.London WC1E 7HT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Histological examination of the eyes of Glossina morsitans Westw. and G. austeni Newst. showed that visual acuity, as calculated from ommatidial size and interommatidial angle, varies in different zones and planes of the eye, being greatest in the forward-facing region. A study of optomotor responses to revolving black-and-white striped patterns indicated that the eyes could perceive both rapid and very slight movement: responses showed a unimodal distribution with frequency of ommatidial stimulation ranging from one flash/25 s to around 80 flashes/s, with an optimum response at 5 flashes/s. Movement perception was also enhanced by summation of ommatidia simultaneously stimulated, provided the stimulated ommatidia were not contiguous. Strong optomotor response was shown to the movement of black stripes so narrow as to cause merely a 7% reduction in the amount of light entering an ommatidium: from this it was inferred that the eye's contrast sensitivity is well developed. Visual acuity determinations from optomotor responses showed no species or sex differences, and the values corresponded closely with those obtained from anatomical measurements. Of the properties of selected figures examined for attractiveness to orienting flies, linearity of form and brightness contrast with background illumination were deduced to be the most important aspects.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , February 1973 , pp. 343 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Autrum, H. & Stoecker, M. (1950). Die Verschmelzungs Frequenzen des Bienenauges.—Z. Naturf. 5b, 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, H. B. (1952). The size of ommatidia in apposition eyes.—J. exp. Biol. 29, 667–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrass, R. (1960). The settling of tsetse flies, Glossina morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Muscidae) on cloth screens.—Entomologia exp. appl. 3, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, J. (1972). The visual responsiveness of the tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans Westw. (Glossinidae) to moving objects: the effects of hunger, sex, host odour and stimuli characteristics.—Bull. ent. Res. 62, 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtt, E. T. & Catton, W. T. (1962). Resolving power of the compound eye.—Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 16, 72–85.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1955). The natural history of tsetse flies. An account of the biology of the genus Glossina (Diptera).—Mem. Lond. Sch. Hyg. trop. Med. no. 10, 816 pp.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. F. (1961). Some experiments to determine the methods used in host-finding by the tsetse fly, Glossina medicorum Austen.—Bull. ent. Res. 52, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, G. J. W., Paget, J. & Wilson, F. (1969). Observations on the behaviour of tsetse flies (Glossina morsitans orientalis Vanderplank and G. pallidipes Austen) during an attempt to concentrate breeding around cattle.—J. appl. Ecol. 6, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltringham, H. (1936). On the eyes of tsetse flies.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 85, 281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G. S. & Gunn, D. L. (1940). The orientation of animals. Kineses, taxes and compass reactions.—352 pp. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Glover, P. E. (1967). The importance of ecological studies in the control of tsetse flies.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 37, 581–614.Google ScholarPubMed
Gurr, E. (1958). Methods of analytical histology and histochemistry.—327 pp. London, Leonard Hill.Google Scholar
Hecht, S. & Wolf, E. (1929). The visual acuity of the honeybee.—J. gen. Physiol. 12, 727–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazokhin-Porshnyakov, G. A. (1969). Insect vision.—306 pp. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Mellanby, K. (1936). Experimental work with the tsetse-fly, Glossina palpalis, in Uganda.—Bull. ent. Res. 27, 611–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichardt, W. (1962). Nervous integration in the facet eye.—Biophys. J. 2, (Suppl.) 121–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, K. (1960). Perception of movement in compound eyes studied by optomotor reaction of mosquitoes.—J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. (Ser. VI, Zool.) 14, 349–380.Google Scholar
Wallace, G. K. (1958). Some experiments on form perception in the nymphs of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria Forskål.—J. exp. Biol. 35, 765–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1965). The principles of insect physiology.—6th edn, 741 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. (1933). Critical frequency of flicker as a function of intensity of illumination for the eye of the bee.—J. gen. Physiol. 17, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zerrahn, G. (1933). Formdressur und Formunterscheidung bei der Honigbiene.—Z. vergl. Physiol. 20, 117–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar