Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:51:29.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labobatory studies on dispersion behaviour of adult beetles in grain. I.—The grain weevil, Sitophilus Granarius (L.) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Gordon Surtees
Gordon Surtees
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Pest Infestation Laboratory, Slough, Bucks.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The dispersion of groups of adult grain weevils (Sitophilus granarius (L.)) was investigated under controlled conditions by observing the numbers occurring on the surface, or at various depths below it, in small bulks of grain. The effect of population density, and temperature and moisture content of the grain, on numbers at the surface was studied by using groups of weevils in 500 g. wheat, and on dispersion in the vertical plane by confining weevils, isolated or in groups of twenty, within a thin layer of 200 g. wheat contained between vertical glass plates, through which the positions of individuals could be recorded.

In grain at 25°C. and 14 per cent. moisture content, the proportion of the population at the surface was about 17 per cent. for densities of 2–100 insects in 500 g., and was only temporarily changed by adding or removing weevils at the surface; the proportion was higher at nine per cent. moisture content or at 15 or 35°C.

In grain at 25°C. and 14 per cent. moisture content, the typical behaviour pattern of individuals consisted of random vertical and lateral movements, so that there was a constant turnover within a group, but at nine per cent. moisture content and 25°C. they tended predominantly to move upwards. At 15 and 35°C., isolated individuals were stationary, but upward movement was elicited by increase in density; relatively static behaviour at 35°C. is thought to be associated with the need for water conservation. The possible relevance of these results to the detection and control of pest populations and their spread in storage conditions is discussed.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , May 1963 , pp. 147 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birch, L. C. (1947). The oxygen consumption of the small strain of Calandra oryzae L. and Rhizopertha dominica Fab. as affected by temperature and humidity.—Ecology 28 pp. 17–25.Google Scholar
Browning, H. C. (1947). Mechanical disturbance and light as factors influencing the pullulation of Calandra granaria Linn.—Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 116 pp. 675–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L. (1953). Studies in diurnal rhythms. IV. Photoperiodism and geotaxis in Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae).—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 28 pp. 117–132Google Scholar
Cotton, R. T. (1950). Insect pests of stored grain and grain products. Identification, habits and methods of control.—Revd. edn., 244 pp. Minneapolis, Minn., Burgess.Google Scholar
Eastham, L. E. S. & Segrove, F. (1947). The influence of temperature and humidity on instar length in Calandra granaria Linn.—J. exp. Biol. 24 pp. 79–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewer, R. F. (1943). Diurnal activity of three insect pests of stored products.—Nature, Lond. 152 pp. 133–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G. S. & Gunn, D. L. (1940). The orientation of animals. Kineses, taxes and compass reactions.—352 pp. Oxford, Clarendon Pr.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. A. (1948). Stored-products pests: a survey of the principal entomological problems in the United Kingdom.—Ann. appl. Biol. 35 pp. 294–301Google Scholar
Gunn, D. L. & Hopf, H. S. (1942). The biology and behaviour of Ptinus tectus Boie. (Coleoptera, Ptinidae), a pest of stored products. II. The amount of locomotory activity in relation to experimental and to previous temperatures.—J. exp. Biol. 18 pp. 278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hines, W. J. W. (1958). Larval response to gravity and humidity in Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae).—Entomologist 91 pp. 112–114.Google Scholar
Howe, R. W. (1951). The movement of grain weevils through grain.—Bull. ent. Res. 42 pp. 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, D. L. (1935). The respiration of insects in relation to the heating and the fumigation of grain.—Tech. Bull. Minn, agric. Exp. Sta. no. 109, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Mathlein, R. (1961). Experiments with fresh-air treatment for the control of grain storage pests.—Contr. nat. Inst. Plant Prot., Stockholm 12 pp. 95–125.Google Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. (1934). The influence of temperature on the activity of sheep-blowflies.—Bull. ent. Res. 25 pp. 85–99.Google Scholar
O'Farrell, A. F. & Butler, P. M. (1948). Insects and mites associated with the storage and manufacture of foodstuffs in Northern Ireland.—Econ. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. 3 pp. 343–407Google ScholarPubMed
Robinson, W. (1926). Low temperature and moisture as factors in the ecology of the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryza L., and the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius L.—Tech. Bull. Minn, agric. Exp. Sta. no. 41, 43 pp.Google Scholar
Roeder, K. D.Ed. (1953). Insect physiology.—1100 pp. New York, Wiley; London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Shepard, H. H. (1939). Insects infesting stored foods.—Bull. Minn, agric. Exp. Sta. no. 341, 43 pp.Google Scholar
Smereka, E. P. & Hodson, A. C. (1959). Some humidity and light reactions of the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).—Canad. Ent. 91 pp. 784–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M. E. (1951). Control of humidity with potassium hydroxide, sulphuric acid, or other solutions.—Bull. ent. Res. 42 pp. 543–554Google Scholar
Solomon, M. E. & Adamson, B. E. (1955). The powers of survival of storage and domestic pests under winter conditions in Britain.—Bull. ent. Res. 46 pp. 311–355Google Scholar