Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:18:28.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigations of the chemical control of insect pests of cotton in central Africa. III.—Field trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. A. Matthews
G. A. Matthews
Affiliation:
Cotton Pest Research Scheme, Agricultural Research Council of Central Africa, Salisbury, Rhodesia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Field trials in 1958–62 at Gatooma Research Station, Rhodesia, in which carbaryl, DDT, endrin and endosulfan were compared for controlb of insect pests of cotton, confirmed earlier laboratory results which showed that larvae of Diparopsis castanea Hmps. were more susceptible to carbaryl than those Heliothis armigera (Hb.) but that the latter were more susceptible to DDT. Counts of larvel populations showed that neither insecticide used alone could control the bollworm complex statisfactorily. The results indicated that optimum control could best be achieved by applying one or other insecticide as appropriate after inspection of the crop to determine the level of insects attack at diffetent stages during the seasons, rather than by use of mixtures of both insecticides. It is recommended that dimethoate should be added to either of the insecticides for aphid and red spider mite control when required.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , February 1967 , pp. 193 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Matthews, G. A. (1966 a). Investigations of the chemical control of insect pests of cotton in Central Africa. I.—Laboratory rearing methods and tests of insecticides by application to ollworm eggs.—Bull. ent. Res. 57 pp. 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, G. A. (1966 b). Idem. II.—Tests of insecticides with larvae and adults.—Bull. ent. Res. 57 pp. 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, G. A. & Tunstall, J. P. (1966). Field trials comparing carbaryl, DDT, and endosulfan on cotton in Central Africa.—Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 43 pp. 230–239.Google Scholar
Munro, J. M. (1958). The summer cropping regime in the Lower River, Nyasa-land.—Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 35 pp. 101–106.Google Scholar
Parnell, F. R., King, H. E. & Ruston, D. F. (1949). Jassid resistance and hairiness of the cotton plant.—Bull. ent. Res. 39 pp. 539–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, E. O. & Mitchell, B. L. (1945). A report on the status and control of insect pests of cotton in the Lower River districts of Nyasaland.—48 pp. Zomba, Govt Printer.Google Scholar
Tunstall, J. P. & Matthews, G. A. (1963). Cotton insect control recommendations for 1963/64 in the Rhodesias and Nyasaland.—Bull. fed. Minist. Agric. Rhod. Nyasald. no. 2209, 16 pp., issued with Rhod. agric. J. 60 no. 5.Google Scholar
Tunstall, J. P. & Matthews, G. A. (1966). Large scale spraying trials for the control of cotton insect pests in Central Africa.—Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 43 pp. 121–139.Google Scholar
Tunstall, J. P., Matthews, G. A. & Rhodes, A. A. K. (1965). The development of cotton spraying equipment in Central Africa.—Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 42 pp. 131–145.Google Scholar