Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:14:46.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction between pod age and position on damage to cowpea Vigna unguiculata by hemipteran pod-sucking bugs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

P. Koona ,
E.O. Osisanya ,
L.E.N. Jackai ,
M. Tamo ,
J. Tonye  and
J.M. Ngeve
P. Koona*
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
E.O. Osisanya
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
L.E.N. Jackai
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
M. Tamo
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
J. Tonye
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Research for Development, BP 2123, Yaoundé, Cameroon
J.M. Ngeve
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Research for Development, BP 2123, Yaoundé, Cameroon
*
*Fax: (237) 42 21 73 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory and screenhouse studies were carried out to assess the relationship between pod age and pod position of cowpea and damage by different pod bug species. The coreids Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stäl and Riptortus dentipesFabricius caused significant damage to young pods of cultivated genotypes, in contrast to the coreid Anoplocnemis curvipes Fabricius and the pentatomid Aspavia armigera Fabricius which exhibited minor feeding activity. Percent seed damage declined with pod age, the critical stage for pod bug infestation being when pods were about eight days old. Clavigralla tomentosicollis and R. dentipescaused significantly higher damage to pods located within the leaf canopy, thus behaving differently from Anoplocnemis curvipes which showed a distinct preference for pods growing above the leaf canopy. The feeding activity of Aspavia armigerawas not affected by the position of pods on the plant. Overall, the study suggests that cowpea genotypes with a short flowering period and pods held above the leaf canopy offer the most promise in the management of pod-sucking pests.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 91 , Issue 6 , December 2001 , pp. 453 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aina, J.O. (1975) The life-history of Riptortus dentipes F., a pest of growing cowpea pods. Journal of Natural History 9, 589–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinyele, O., Onigbinde, A.O., Hussain, M.A. and Omololu, A. (1986) Physicochemical characteristics of 18 cultivars of Nigerian cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) and their cooking properties. Journal of Food Science 56, 1483–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booker, R.H. (1964) Pests of cowpeas and their control in northern Nigeria. Bulletin of Entomological Research 55, 663–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling, C.C. (1979) The stylet sheath as an indicator of feeding activity of rice sting bug. Journal of Economic Entomology 72, 259–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, S.J. (1980) An energetic analysis of host plant selection by the large milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus. Oecologia 46, 254–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiang, H.S. and Jackai, L.E.N. (1988) Tough pod wall: a factor involved in cowpea resistance to pod sucking bugs. Insect Science and its Application 9, 389–393.Google Scholar
Dreyer, H. and Baumgartner, J. (1995) The influence of post-flowering pests on cowpea seed yield with particular reference to damage by Heteroptera in southern Benin. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 53, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewete, F.K. and Olagbaju, R.A. (1990) The development of Aspavia armigera Fabricius (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and its status as a pest of cowpea and rice. Insect Science and its Application 11, 171–177.Google Scholar
Gilman, D.R., Person, M.C., William, R.M. and Newson, L.O. (1982) Resistance in soybeans to the southern stink bug. Crop Science 22, 573–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, W.N.O. (1983) The ecology of pod-sucking bugs of cowpea (V. unguiculata Walp) with special reference to Clavigralla species and their host range in Nigeria. 138 pp. MSc thesis. University of Ghana, Legon.Google Scholar
IITA (1985) International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Annual Report for 1984. 238 pp. Ibadan, Nigeria, IITA.Google Scholar
Jackai, L.E.N. (1984) Studies on the feeding behaviour of Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stäl (Hemiptera: Coreidae) and their potential use in bioassays for host plant resistance. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 98, 344–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackai, L.E.N. (1989) A laboratory procedure for rearing the cowpea coreid, Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stäl. (Hemiptera), using dry cowpea seeds. Bulletin of Entomological Research 79, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackai, L.E.N. (1990) Screening of cowpea for resistance to Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stal (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 83, 300–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackai, L.E.N., Atropo, P.K. and Odebiyi, J.A. (1989) Use of the response of two growth stages of cowpea to different population densities of the coreid bug, Clavigralla tomentosicollis (Stäl) to determine the action threshold levels. Crop Protection 8, 422–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaemba, B.M. and Khamala, P.M. (1981) Relation of pod age to the expression of resistance in cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) to common pod sucking bugs Riptortus dentipes (F.) and Anoplocnemis curvipes (F.) (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Kenya Journal of Science and Technology 2, 47–52.Google Scholar
Ochieng, R.S. (1977) Studies on the bionomics of two major pests of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.), Ootheca mutabilis Sahl. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Anocplonemis curvipes Fabricius (Hemiptera: Coreidae). PhD thesis, University of Ibadan.Google Scholar
Oghiakhe, S., Jackai, L.E.N. and Makanjuola, W.A. (1991) Cowpea plant architecture in relation to infestation and damage by the legume pod borer, Maruca testulalis Geyer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). 1 – Effect of canopy structure and pod position. Insect Science and its Application 12, 193–199.Google Scholar
Oghiakhe, S., Jackai, L.E.N. and Makanjuola, W.A. (1992) Pod wall toughness has no effect on cowpea resistance to the legume pod borer Maruca testulalis Geyer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Insect Science and its Application 13, 345–349.Google Scholar
Ojehomon, O.O. (1968) Flowering, fruit production and abscission in cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp. Journal of the West African Science Association 13, 227–234.Google Scholar
Olatunde, G.O., Odebiyi, J.A., Chiang, H.S. and Jackai, L.E.N. (1991) Identification of sources of resistance in cowpea, Vigna unguiculata L. Walp. to Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stäl (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Insect Science and its Application 12, 455–461.Google Scholar
Scriber, J.M. (1984) Host plant suitability. pp. 160–202 in Bell, W.J. & Cardé, R.T. (Eds) Chemical ecology of insects. 524 pp. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Siddique, A.K.M.A.R. and Gupta, S.N. (1991) Genotypic and phenotypic variability for seed yield and other traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.). International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 9, 144–148.Google Scholar
Singh, S.R. & Taylor, T.A. (1978) Pests of grain legumes and their control in Nigeria. pp. 267–279 in Singh, S.R., van Emden, H.F. & Taylor, T.A. (Eds) Pest of grain legumes: ecology and control. 454 pp. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Summerfield, R.J., Pate, J.S., Roberts, E.H. & Wien, H.C. (1985) The physiology of cowpeas. pp. 65–101 in Singh, S.R. & Rachie, K.O. (Eds) Cowpea research, production and utilization. 460 pp. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar