Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:37:32.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influences of weather and time of day on trap catches of bush fly,Musca vetustissima Walker (Diptera: Muscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

W. G. Vogt
W. G. Vogt
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, PO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field populations of Musca vetustissima Walker were sampled in a region of New South Wales at 2-h intervals on 35 occasions between spring 1984 and autumn 1985 using wind-oriented fly traps. Ambient temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity and wind speed explained 84·3% of the within-day deviance of total catches (both sexes combined). Temperature and solar radiation jointly explained 82·6% of this deviance (71·1 and 11·5%, respectively), indicating that the other variables, although significant, did not greatly affect trap catches. As air temperature increased, log catch rates increased non-linearly up to a maximum at 27·5°C and declined thereafter. Log catch rates increased linearly as solar radiation increased and declined linearly as relative humidity and wind speed increased. Changes in log catch rates with time of day were explained almost entirely by the four weather variables, i.e. when weather effects were removed, time of day effects were no longer significant. These weather variables also accounted for 79·9% of the between-day variation in logarithms of trap catches. Relative responses of males and females to traps differed significantly with respect to relative humidity, wind speed and time of day. Male catches tended to increase relative to female catches between 1200 h and 1800 h and also declined more slowly with increases in relative humidity and wind speed. Separate models are presented for standardization of male and female catch rates; the estimates differ from those obtained from observed sex ratios and total catch rates, but the differences are small compared to the observed day-to-day variation in catch rates.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , September 1986 , pp. 359 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Feehan, J., Hughes, R. D., Bryce, M. A. & Runko, S. (1985). Bush fly abundance and population events in relation to dung beetle catches on the south coast of New South Wales.—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 24, 37–43.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. D. (1977a). The population dynamics of the bushfly: the elucidation of population events in the field.—Aust. J. Ecol. 2, 43–54.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. D. (1977b). Some problems associated with quantitative sampling of bushfly (Musca vetustissima Walker).—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 16, 117–122.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. D., Greenham, P. M., Tyndale-Biscoe, M. & Walker, J. M. (1972). A synopsis of observations on the biology of the Australian bushfly (Musca vetustissima Walker).—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 11, 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D. & Morton, R. (1985). Bush fly abundance in an overwintering zone during 1979–82 compared with some data collected before the introduction of exotic dung beetles.—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 24, 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D. & Nicholas, W. L. (1974). The spring migration of the bushfly (Musca vetustissima Walk.): evidence of displacement provided by natural population markers including parasitism.—J. Anim. Ecol. 43, 411–428.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. D. & Sands, P. (1979). Modelling bushfly populations.—J. appl. Ecol. 16, 117–139.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. D., Tyndale-Biscoe, M. & Walker, J. (1978). Effects of introduced dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on the breeding and abundance of the Australian bushfly, Musca vetustissima Walker (Diptera: Muscidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 361–372.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, J. N. (1983). The seasonal distribution and characteristics of bush fly Musca vetustissima Walker populations in south-western Australia.—Aust. J. Ecol. 8, 383–394.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, J. N. (1985). Populations of the bush fly (Musca vetustissima Walker) in arid Australia.—Aust. J. Ecol. 10, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelder, J. A. & Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972). Generalised linear models.—Jl R. statist. Soc. (A) 135, 370–384.Google Scholar
Norris, K. R. (1966). Notes on the ecology of the bushfly, Musca vetustissima Walk. (Diptera: Muscidae), in the Canberra district.—Aust. J. Zool. 14, 1139–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, W. G., Runko, S. & Starick, N. T. (1985a). A wind-oriented fly trap for quantitative sampling of adult Musca vetustissima Walker.—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 24, 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, W. G., Woodburn, T. L. & Crompton, G. W. (1981). Estimating absolute densities of the bushfly, Musca vetustissima Walker (Diptera: Muscidae), using West Australian blowfly traps.—Bull. ent. Res. 71, 329–337.Google Scholar
Vogt, W. G., Woodburn, T. L., Morton, R. & Ellem, B. A. (1983). The analysis and standardisation of trap catches of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae).— Bull. ent. Res. 73, 609–617.Google Scholar
Vogt, W. G., Woodburn, T. L., Morton, R. & Ellem, B. A. (1985b). The influence of weather and time of day on trap catches of males and females of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae).—Bull. ent. Res. 75, 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar