Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T21:58:11.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of the host plant of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on biological characteristics of its parasitoid Apoanagyrus lopezi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. Souissi  and
B. Le Rü
R. Souissi
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Ecobiologie des Insectes Parasitoides, Université de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes Cédex, France
B. Le Rü*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Entomologie Appliquée, ORSTOM, BP 1286, Pointe Noire, Congo
*
* Fax: (242) 94 39 81
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of the host plant of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Matile Ferrero on the encyrtid parasitoid Apoanagyrus lopezi De Santis was studied in the laboratory. Four different host plants were used: two cultivars of cassava, Manihot esculenta (Euphorbiaceae), cv. Incoza and cv. MM79; Faux caoutchouc, a hybrid of M. esculenta × M glaziovii; and talinum Talinum triangularae (Portulacaceae), a common weed in cassava fields. Plants were selected for different levels of antibiotic resistance to P. manihoti. Mealybug mortality due to host feeding by the adult parasitoid and the percentage of mealybugs parasitized were significantly lower when mealybugs were reared on the Manihot cultivars and hybrid than when reared on talinum. However, the encapsulation rate was significantly lower in P. manihoti reared on talinum. The highest percentage parasitism and the lowest rate of emergence were recorded on cv. Incoza, the most resistant Manihot cultivar. The sex ratio did not vary significantly with the host plant used. The total developmental time and size of male and female progeny of A. lopezi differed significantly between P. manihoti reared on different host plants. Among Manihot plants, parasitoid size was positively correlated with development time and negatively with plant resistance. Results suggest that the parasitoid, A. lopezi, might perform better if cassava cultivars were selected for their strong antixenosis but low antibiotic characteristics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 75 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhatt, N. & Singh, R. (1989) Bionomics of an aphidiid parasitoid Trioxys indicus. 30. Effects of host plants on reproductive and developmental factors. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 6, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, N. & Singh, R. (1991) Bionomics of an aphidiid parasitoid Trioxys indicus, Subba Rao & Sharma. 33. Impact of food plants on the behaviour of and sex allocation by the female parasitoid at varying densities. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 7, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calatayud, P.A. (1993) Etude des relations nutritionnelles de la cochenille du manioc avec sa plante hôte. Thèse INSA de Lyon, France, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Calatayud, P.A., Rahbé, Y., Delobel, B., Khuong-Huu, F., Tertuliano, M. & Le Rü, B. (1994) Influence of secondary compounds in the phloem sap of cassava on expression of antibiosis towards the mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 72, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B.C. & Duffey, S.S. (1979) Tomatine and parasitic wasps. Potential incompatibility of plant antibiosis with biological control. Science 205, 700–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrar, R.R. Jr., Barbour, J.D. & Kennedy, G.C.. (1994) Field evaluation of insect resistance in a wild tomato and its effects on insect parasitoids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 71, 211–226.Google Scholar
Giordanengo, P. & Nénon, J.P. (1990) Melanization and encapsulation of eggs and larvae of Epidinocarsis lopezi by its host Phenococcus manihoti. Effects of superparasitism and egg laying patterns. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 56, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H.C.J. (1994) Parasitoids: behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Krebs, J. & Clutton-Brock, T. (Eds) Princeton University Press, 473 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, A.P., Mills, N.J., Schreiber, S.J. & Ellis, C.K. (1994) A physiologically based tritrophic perspective on bottom-up-top-down regulation of populations. Ecology 75, 2227–2242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156, 477–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herren, H.R. & Neuenschwander, P. (1991) Biological control of cassava pests in Africa. Annual Review of Entomology 36, 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iheagwam, E.U. (1981) The influence of temperature on increase rates of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti, Mat. Ferr. (Hom. Pseudococidae). Revue de Zoologie Africaine 95, 959–964.Google Scholar
Iziquel, Y. (1990) Le parasitisme de la cochnille du manioc par l'Encyrtidae Epidinocarsis lopezi. Un exemple d'interactions hôte-parasitoïide chez les insectes. Thèse d'Universit´ de Rennes 1, 75 pp.Google Scholar
Iziquel, Y. & Le R', B. (1989) Influence de l'hyperparasitisme sur les populations d'un Hymènoptère Encyrtidae, Epidinocarsis lopezi, parasitoïde de la cochenille du manioc Phenacoccus manihoti introduit au Congo. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 52, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iziquel, Y. & Le Rü, B. (1992) Fecundity, longevity, and intrinsic natural rate of increase of Epidinocarsis lopezi (De Santis) (Hym. Encyrtidae). Canadian Entomologist 124, 1115–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iziquel, Y., Le Ralec, A. & Nénon, J.P. (1988) Epidinocarsis lopezi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae): ovipositeur, types de piqûres et nature du parasitisme sur Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Le Naturaliste Canadien (Revue d'Ecologie et de Systématique) 115, 107–121.Google Scholar
King, B.H. (1988) Sex ratio manipulation in response to host size by the parasitoid wasp Spalangia cameroni: a laboratory study. Evolution 42, 1190–1198.Google ScholarPubMed
Kraaijeveld, A.R. & Van Alphen, J.J.M. (1986) Host stage selection and sex allocation by Epidinocarsis lopezi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a parasitoid of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Mededelingen Fakulteit Landbouwetenschappen Gent 51, 1067–1078.Google Scholar
Langenbach, G.E.J & Van Alphen, J.J.M (1986) Searching behaviour of Epidinocarsis lopezi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on cassava: effect of leaf topography and a kairomone produced by its host, the cassava mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti). Mededelingen, Fakulteit Landbouwetenschappen Gent 51, 1057–1065.Google Scholar
Laughlin, R. (1965) Capacity for increase: a useful population statistic. Journal of Animal Ecology 34, 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Rü, B. & Tertuliano, M. (1993) Tolerance of different host-plants to the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). International Journal of Pest Management 39, 379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löhr, B., Neuenschwander, P., Varela, A.M. & Santos, B. (1988) Interactions between the female parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi De Santis (Hym., Encytidae) and its host, the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Hom., Pseudococcidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 105, 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, F.G. & Jennings, P.R. (Eds) (1980) Breeding plants resistant to insects. New York, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Nadel, H. & Van Alphen, J.J.M (1987) The role of host and host-plant odours in the attraction of a parasidoid, Epidinocarsis lopezi, to the habitat of its host, the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 45, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nénon, J.P., Guyomard, O. & Hémon, G. (1988) Encapsulement des oeufs et des larves de l'Hyménoptère Encyrtidae Epidinocarsis (=Apoanagyrus) lopezi par son hüte Pseudococcidae Phenacoccus manihoti; effet de la température et du superparasitisme. Compte Rendu de I'Académie des Sciences, Paris 306, 325–331.Google Scholar
Neuenschwander, P. & Madojemu, E. (1986) Mortality of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Mat. Ferr. (Hom., Pseudococcidae), associated with an attack by Epidinocarsis lopezi (Hym. Encyrtidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique Suisse 59, 57–62.Google Scholar
Neuenschwander, P., Hammond, W.N.O, Ajuono, O., Gado, A., Echendu, N., Bokonon-Ganta, A.H., Allomasso, R. & Okon, I. (1990) Biological control of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) by Epidinocarsis lopezi (De Santis) (Hym.: Encyrtidae) in west Africa, as influenced by climate and soil. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment 32, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, R.H. (1951) Insect resistance in crops plants. The University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, 520 pp.Google Scholar
Powell, W. (1992) Synomones and kairomones from plants and honeydew in susceptible and resistant varieties: their importance to natural enemies. Proceedings of the XIX International Conj. Entomology, Beijing, China, June 28-July 4, 1992.Google Scholar
Price, P.W., Bouton, C.E., Gross, P., McPheron, B.A., Thompson, J.N. & Weis, A.E. (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, D.K., Webster, J.A., Jones, B.G. & Burd, J.D. (1991) Tritrophic relationships of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae), a hymenopterous parasitoid (Diaeretiella rapae Mclntosh), and resistant and susceptible small grains. Biological Control 1, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, D.J. & Neuenschwander, P. (1988) Melanization of eggs and larvae of the parasitoid, Epidinocarsis lopezi (De Santis) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), by the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Canadian Entomologist 120, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takabayashi, J. & Takahashi, S. (1993) Role of the scale wax of Ceroplastes ceriferus Anderson (Homiptera: Coccidae) as a defense against the parasitic wasp Anicetus ceroplastis Ishii (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 6, 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takabayashi, J., Dicke, M. & Posthumus, M.A. (1991) Variation in composition of predator-attracting allelochemicals emitted by herbivore-infested plants: relative influence of plant and herbivore. Chemoecology 2, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tertuliano, M.Dossou-Gbete, S. & Le Rü, B. (1993) Antixenotic and antibiotic components of resistance to the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in various host-plants. Insect Science and its Application 14, 657–665.Google Scholar
Tingle, C.C.D & Copland, M.J.W (1988) Effects of temperature and host-plant on regulation of glasshouse mealybug (Hom: Pseudococcidae) populations by introduced parasitoids (Hym.: Encyrtidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 78, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijken, M.J., Van Alphen, J.J.M & Van Stratum, P. (1989) Sex allocation in Epidinocarsis lopezi: local mate competition. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 52, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijken, M.J., Neuenschwander, P., Van Alphen, J.J.M & Hammond, W.N.O (1991) Sex ratios in field populations of an exotic parasitoid of the cassava mealybug, in Africa. Ecological Entomology 16, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Emden, H.F. (1987) Cultural methods: the plant. pp. 27–68in Burn, A.J., Coaker, T.H. & Jepson, P.C. (Eds) Integrated pest management. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van Emden, H.F. (1991) The role of host plant resistance in insect pest mis-management. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vet, L.E.M & Dicke, M. (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1976) Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 21, 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, M.E. (1994) The importance of being large: the relationship between size and fitness in females of the parasitoid Aphaereta minuta (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Animal Ecology 63, 963–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waage, J.K. (1982) Sex ratio and populations dynamics of natural enemies: some possible interactions. Annals of Applied Biology 101, 159–164.Google Scholar
Waage, J.K. & Hassell, M.P. (1982) Parasitoids as biological control agents. A fundamental approach. Parasitology 84, 241–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar