Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:38:20.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host-plant finding by the asparagus fly, Plioreocepta poeciloptera (Diptera: Tephritidae), a monophagous, monovoltine tephritid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

É Thibout ,
D. Pierre ,
N. Mondy ,
C. Lecomte ,
J.C. Biémont  and
J. Auger
É Thibout
Affiliation:
IRBI, UMR CNRS 6035, Université F. Rabelais, Faculté des Sciences, Parc Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France
D. Pierre
Affiliation:
IRBI, UMR CNRS 6035, Université F. Rabelais, Faculté des Sciences, Parc Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France
N. Mondy
Affiliation:
IRBI, UMR CNRS 6035, Université F. Rabelais, Faculté des Sciences, Parc Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France
C. Lecomte
Affiliation:
IRBI, UMR CNRS 6035, Université F. Rabelais, Faculté des Sciences, Parc Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France
J.C. Biémont
Affiliation:
IRBI, UMR CNRS 6035, Université F. Rabelais, Faculté des Sciences, Parc Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France
J. Auger*
Affiliation:
IRBI, UMR CNRS 6035, Université F. Rabelais, Faculté des Sciences, Parc Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France
*
*Fax: 33 2 47 36 69 66 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The role of various olfactory and visual stimuli was studied in host-plant finding by the asparagus fly Plioreocepta poeciloptera (Schrank), a monophagous monovoltine tephritid causing serious damage to asparagus spears. Volatiles released by asparagus plants were extracted by diethyl ether after cryotrapping concentration, and identified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Twelve of the 13 compounds identified were tested using electroantennography to measure the response of the fly. Behavioural response was analysed using two different flight tunnels according to circadian rhythm, age and sex of adults, presence of the plant and of different coloured lures, presence of a male congener, or exposure to four pure asparagus odour compounds that elicited responses in electroantennography, i.e. hexanal, (E)-2-hexenal, (Z)-2-hexen-1-ol and decanal. Data showed that males locate the host plant more quickly than females. Females are attracted mainly by the blend of plant odour and male pheromone. Both sexes respond to a complex of stimuli only during the afternoon. These findings will be helpful in developing new and effective approaches to control this pest insect.

Keywords

Plioreocepta poecilopteraasparagushost-findingolfactory stimulivisual stimulibehaviourplant volatiles
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 95 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 393 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Averill, A.L., Prokopy, R.J., Sylvia, M.M., Connor, P.P. & Wong, T.T.Y. (1996) Effects of recent experience on foraging in tephritid fruit flies. Journal of Chemical Ecology 9, 571–583.Google Scholar
Balachowsky, A. & Mesnil, L. (1936) Les insectes nuisibles aux plantes cultivÉes 1921. Paris, Mery L.Google Scholar
BrÉvault, T. & Quilici, S. (1999) Factors affecting behavioural responses to visual stimuli in the tomato fruit fly, Neoceratitis cyanescens. Physiological Entomology 24, 333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, L.D., Foote, R.H. (1960) Biology of fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 5, 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delbreil, B., Lefrançois, C. (1996) L'asperge, un lÉgume de pointe. Biofutur 154, 32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinan, L., Savchenko, T. & Whiting, P. (2001) Phytoecdysteroids in the genus Asparagus (Asparagaceae). Phytochemistry 56, 569–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, B.S., Prokopy, R.J. (1991) Host location and oviposition in tephritid fruit flies. pp. 139–171 in Bailey, W.J.Ridsdill-Smith, J.(Eds) Reproductive behaviour of insect. Individuals and populations London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Garcin, C. (2002) Replantation asperge sur asperge. PHM Revue Horticole 433, 60–62.Google Scholar
Headrick, D.H., Goeden, R.D. (1998) The biology of nonfrugivorous fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 43, 217–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, M.M., Sanz, I., Adelantado, M., Ballach, S. & Primo, E. (1996) Electroantennogram activity from antennae of Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) to fresh orange airborne volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22, 1609–1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsoyannos, B.I. (1989) Response to shape, size and color. pp. 307–324, Robinson, A.S.Hooper, G.(Eds) Fruit flies. Their biology, natural enemies and control. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Landolt, P.J., Reed, H.C., Heath, R.R. (1992) Attraction of female papaya fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) to male pheromone and host fruit. Environmental Entomology 21, 1154–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecomte, C., Pierre, D., Pouzat, J. & Thibout, E. (1998) Behavioural and olfactory variations in the leek moth, Acrolepiopsis assectella, after several generations of rearing under diverse conditions. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 86, 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robacker, D.C. & Fraser, I. (2002) Attraction of Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to grapefruit: enhancement by mechanical wounding of and experience with grapefruit. Journal of Insect Behavior 15, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SÉrès, C. & Lemaitre, C. (1996) Les problèmes sanitaires de l'asperge en France: bilan et mÉthodes de lutte. PHM Revue Horticole 371, 28–34.Google Scholar
Thibout, E. & Auger, J. (1998) Sexual attraction and male pheromone evidence in the asparagus fly, Plioreocepta poeciloptera. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 92, 335–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibout, E., Auger, J., Petersen, K.S. & Oliver, J.Male pheromone characterization in, the asparagus fly, Plioreocepta poeciloptera (Tephritidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology (in press).Google Scholar
Tressl, R., Holzer, M. & Apetz, M. (1977a) Formation of flavor components in asparagus. 1. Biosynthesis of sulfur-containing acids in asparagus. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 25, 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tressl, R., Bahri, D., Holzer, M. & Kossa, T. (1977b) Formation of flavor components in asparagus. 2. Formation of flavor components in cooked asparagus. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 25, 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, D., Hoberg, E., Bittner, T., Engewald, W. & Meilchen, K. (2001) Contribution of volatile compounds to the flavor of cooked asparagus. European Food Research and Technology 213, 200–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagawa, H., Kato, T., Kitahara, Y., Takahashi, N. & Kato, Y. (1972) Asparagusic acid, dihydroasparagusic acid and S-acetylhydroasparagusic acid, new plant growth inhibitors in ethiolated young Asparagus officinalis. Tetrahedron Letters 25, 2549–2452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwölfer, H. (1983) Life systems and strategies of resource exploitation in tephritids. pp. 16–30in Cavalloro, R.(Ed.) Fruits flies of economic importance. Proceedings of the CEC/IOBC SymposiumAthens.Google Scholar