Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:52:02.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host-correlated morphological variation of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) populations in Greece

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J.T. Margaritopoulos ,
J.A. Tsitsipis ,
E. Zintzaras  and
R.L. Blackman
J.T. Margaritopoulos
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture, Crop and Animal Production, University of Thessaly, Pedion Areos 38334, Volos, Greece
J.A. Tsitsipis*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture, Crop and Animal Production, University of Thessaly, Pedion Areos 38334, Volos, Greece
E. Zintzaras
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture, Crop and Animal Production, University of Thessaly, Pedion Areos 38334, Volos, Greece
R.L. Blackman
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
*
*Fax: +30 421 61957 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Morphological variation in nine characters of 157 clones of Myzus persicae(Sulzer) was examined by multivariate analysis. The clones were collected from peach, Prunus persica, the primary host and the secondary hosts tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum, cabbage, Brassica oleracea, sugarbeet, Beta vulgaris and pepper Capsicum annuum. The 156 clones originated from various regions of Greece, both in the north, where a large part of the population has an annual bisexual generation on peach, and in more southerly regions, where populations are predominantly unisexual. One clone was collected from tobacco in Caserta, Italy. All clones were laboratory-reared on potato. Canonical variate analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis and a non-parametric classification tree method both revealed morphological differences associated with the host-plant on which they were collected. The scores of the first two canonical variates separated the tobacco-feeding clones from those originating from other secondary host-plants. However, in tobacco-growing areas the tobacco-feeding form predominated in spring populations on peach, and was sometimes found on other secondary hosts. In addition, using cluster analysis, the clones from tobacco which were sampled in the most southeasterly region showed a relatively large phenotypic distance from those collected further north and west. Moreover, clonal phenotypes were affected both by host plant and by long-term parthenogenetic rearing. However, in spite of these effects, the tobacco form was generally distinguishable from aphids originating from other hosts, indicating that the difference must have a genetic basis. In separate analyses of the clones originating from secondary hosts no association was found between morphology and either life cycle category or colour. Discriminant analysis showed that 89% of 1723 specimens could be correctly classified into the two groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , June 2000 , pp. 233 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackman, R.L. (1971) Variation in the photoperiodic response within natural populations of Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Bulletin of Entomological Research 60, 533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, R.L. (1987) Morphological discrimination of a tobacco-feeding form from Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), and a key to New World Myzus(Nectarosiphon) species. Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 713–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, R.L. (1992) The use of ordination techniques to discriminate within pest aphid species complexes. pp. 261–275in Sorensen, J.T. & Footit, R. (Eds). Ordination in the study of morphology, evolution and systematic of insects. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Blackman, R.L. & Eastop, V.F. (1984) Aphids of the World's crops: an identification and information guide. London, John Wiley & Sons Publications.Google Scholar
Blackman, R.L. and Eastop, V.F. (1987) The strawberry aphid complex, Chaetosiphon (Pentatrichopus) spp. (Hemiptera: Aphididae) taxonomic significance of variation in karyotype, chaetotaxy and morphology. Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, R.L. & Spence, J.M. (1992) Electrophoretic distinction between the peach–potato aphid, Myzus persicae and the tobacco aphid, Myzus nicotianae (Homoptera: Aphididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 82, 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, R.L. & Spence, J.M. (1994) The effects of temperature on aphid morphology, using a multivariate approach. European Journal of Entomology 91, 7–22.Google Scholar
Blackman, R.L., Eastop, V.F. & Hills, M. (1977) Morphological and cytological separation of Amphorophora Buckton (Homoptera: Aphididae) feeding on European raspberry and blackberry (Rubus spp.). Bulletin of Entomological Research 66, 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A.F.G. (1998) Aphid ecology. 2nd edn. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Field, L.M., Javed, N., Stribley, M.F. & Devonshire, A.L. (1994) The peach–potato aphid Myzus persicae and the tobacco aphid Myzus nicotianae have the same esterase-based mechanisms of insecticide resistance. Insect Molecular Biology 3, 143–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillham, M.C. & Claridge, M.F. (1994) A multivariate approach to host plant associated morphological variation in the polyphagous leafhopper Alnetoidia alneti (Dahlbom). Biological Journal of Linnean Society 53, 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilharco, F.A. & van Harten, A. (1987) Systematics. pp. 51–77in Minks, A.K. & Harrewijn, P. (Eds) Aphids. Their biology, natural enemies and control. Volume A, 450 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kolesova, D.A., Kuznetova, V.G. & Shaposhnikov, G.K. (1980) Clonal variability in peach aphid, Myzus persicae Sulz. (Homoptera: Aphididae) [in Russian]. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 59, 514–528.Google Scholar
Krzanowski, W.J. (1990) Principles of multivariate analysis. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lazzari, S.M.N. & Voegtlin, D.J. (1993) Morphological variation in Rhopalosiphum padi and R. insertum (Homoptera: Aphididae) related to host plant and temperature. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 86, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margaritopoulos, J.T., Mamuris, Z. & Tsitsipis, J.A. (1998) Attempted discrimination of Myzus persicae and Myzus nicotianae (Homoptera: Aphididae) by random amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction technique. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91, 602–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, A.N. (1986) Morphological adaptation to host plants in Uroleucon (Homoptera: Aphididae). Evolution 40, 1044–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, A.N. (1988) The evolution of host-plant alternation in aphids: evidence for specialisation as dead end. American Naturalist 132, 681–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R. (1973) Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco, W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Takada, H. (1986) Genotype composition and insecticide resistance of Japanese population of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 100, 451–458.Google Scholar
Wool, D. (1977) Genetic and environmental components of morphological variation in gall-forming aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae, Fordinae) in relation to climate. Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 875–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodford, J.A.T. (1977) The effect of genotype, environment, age and morph on morphological variation in alate Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 67, 685–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagorovskii, A.V. (1947) Leaf peach aphid (Myzodes persicae Sulzer) as a tobacco pest in Uzbekistan and measures for its control [in Russian]. 45 pp. Frunze Zos, Vsesoyuzny Institute Tabaka and Makhorki [cited in Kolesova et al., 1980].Google Scholar
Zintzaras, E., Brown, N.P. & Kowald, A. (1994) Growing a classification tree using the apparent misclassification rate. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 10, 263–271.Google ScholarPubMed