Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:07:22.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hieroxestis subcervinella, Wlk., an Enemy of the Banana in the Canary Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. N. Oldham
J. N. Oldham
Affiliation:
Field Naturalist, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The moth, Hieroxestis subcervinella, Wlk., has recently become a pest of economic importance to the banana cultivators in the Canary Islands.

Notes on the genus Hieroxestis and on the synonymy and distribution of the moth are included, and descriptions of the various stages of the insect are given. Details regarding the external morphology and chaetotaxy of the full-grown larva are enumerated, and setal maps showing the distribution of the setae have been added.

The pupa is described in detail, and sex characters are noted.

The economic importance of the pest is considered in its relation to its host-plants, while its method of attack and resulting injuries caused are discussed.

The insect is considered as apodemic in the Canary Islands, and no parasitic natural enemies were encountered.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , August 1928 , pp. 147 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Back, E. A. & Pemberton, C. E. 1916. “Banana as a host fruit of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly.”—J. Agric. Res., Washington, v, no. 17, pp. 793–803.Google Scholar
Butler, A. G. 1876.—Ann. Mag. N.H., (4) xvii, p. 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, T. A. 1893. “On some neglected points in the structure of the pupae of Heterocerous Lepidoptera, etc.”—Trans. Ent. Soc. London, pp. 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, M. T. 1913.—“The Diseases of Tropical Plants.”—MacMillan & Co., Ltd., London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1923. “The Lepidoptera of the Madeira Islands.”—The Entomologist, lvi, p. 247.Google Scholar
Durrant, J. H. 1923. “A moth from Saint Helena in Britain.”—Proc. Ent. Soc. London, p. xvii.Google Scholar
Durrant, J. H. 1925. “The Banana Moth, Hieroxestis subcervinella, Wkr.”—Ent. Mon. Mag., lxi, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
Fawcett, W. “The Banana, its Cultivation, Distribution and Commercial Uses.”—Duckworth & Co., London. 2nd Edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. C. 1924. “The life-history and habits of Tortrix pronubana, Hb., etc.”—Ann. App. Biol., xi, nos. 3 & 4, pp. 395–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fracker, S. B. 1915. “The Classification of Lepidopterous Larvae.”—Illinois Biol. Monog., ii, no. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatchett-Jackson, W. 1890. “Studies in the morphology of the Lepidoptera. Part 1.”—Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Zoology, (2) v, pt. 4, pp. 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melliss, J. C. 1875. “St. Helena, a Physical, Historical, and Topographical description of the Island.”—Reeve & Co., London, p. 192.Google Scholar
Meyrick, E. 1892.—Proc. Linn. Soc., N.S.W., xvii, pp. 482, 567–568 (sp. 139).Google Scholar
Meyrick, E. 1910.—Trans. Ent. Soc. London, p. 375.Google Scholar
Meyrick, E. 1911. “Tortricina and Tineina.”—Trans. Linn. Soc., London, Zoology, (2) xiv, pt. II, pp. 263–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyrick, E. 1923.—Trans. Ent. Soc. London, p. 556.Google Scholar
Mosher, E. 1916. “A classication of the Lepidoptera based on characters of the pupa.”—Bull. Illinois State Lab. Nat. Hist., xii, art. 2.Google Scholar
Poulton, E. B. 1890. “The External Morphology of the Lepidopterous Pupa, etc. Pts. I–III.”—Trans. Linn. Soc., London, Zoology, (2) v, pt. 5, pp. 197–202.Google Scholar
Swezey, O. H. 1909. “The Hawaiian Sugar-cane Bud Moth (Ereunetis flavistriata), with an account of some allied species and natural enemies.”—Bull. Exp. Stat. H.S.P.A., vi, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
Swezey, O. H. 1910. “The feeding habits of Hawaiian Lepidoptera.”—Proc. Hawai. Ent. Soc., ii, p. 142.Google Scholar
Swezey, O. H. 1922. “Hieroxestis omoscopa, Meyr.”—Proc. Hawai. Ent. Soc., v, p. 9.Google Scholar
Trägårdh, I. 1913. “Contributions towards the comparative morphology of the trophi of the Lepidopterous leaf-miners.”—Ark. f. Zool., viii, no. 9.Google Scholar
Walker, F. E. 1863.—Cat. Lep. B.M. xxviii, pp. 477–8 (sp. 78).Google Scholar
Walsingham, Lord. 1907.—“Fauna Hawaiiensis,” i, pt. 5, p. 713.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. 1923. “A New Type of Light Trap for Insects.”—Minist. Agric. Egypt Tech. & Sci. Serv., Bull. xxviii.Google Scholar
Wollaston, T. V. 1879. “Notes on the Lepidoptera of St. Helena, with descriptions of new species.”—Ann. Mag. N. H. (5) iii, p. 417.Google Scholar