Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:02:44.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The habitat preference of some bovine dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Hluhluwe Game Reserve, South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Bernard M. Doube
Bernard M. Doube
Affiliation:
Dung Beetle Research Unit, Private Bag X5, Lynn East, Pretoria 0039, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of vegetative cover and soil type on the abundance and distribution of 50 species of scarabaeine dung beetle were examined during three successive days in January 1979 in Hluhluwe Game Reserve, South Africa. Pitfall traps baited with bovine dung were set at intervals of 20 m in a transect across a 20–ha patch of grassveld surrounded by Acacia bushveld. One end of the transect was on clay–loam soil and the other on sandy loam. In all, 32 936 specimens were caught, representing 71 species from 22 genera. Thirty–two species were diurnal and 18 were crepuscular or nocturnal. Twenty–six species were more abundant in bushveld than in grassveld, and eight species were more abundant in grassveld than in bushveld. Soil type influenced the relative abundance of 23 species. The degree of habitat specificity varied widely between species. During overcast weather, both bushveld and grassveld species became abundant in the transitional zone between bushveld and grassveld where the light intensity was similar to that in bushveld on a clear day. It is suggested that light intensity is one characteristic by which beetles recognise bushveld and grassveld.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 357 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blume, R. R., Matter, J. J. & Eschle, J. L. (1973). Onthophagus gazella: effect on survival of horn flies in the laboratory. — Environ. Entomol. 2, 811–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornemissza, G. F. (1960). Could dung eating insects improve our pastures?. — J. Aust. Inst. agric. Sci. 26, 54–56.Google Scholar
Bornemissza, G. F. (1970). Insectary studies on the control of dung breeding flies by the activity of the dung beetle, Onthophagus gazella F. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). — J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 9, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornemissza, G. F. (1976). The Australian dung beetle project 1965–1975. — Rev. Aust. Meat Res. Comm. 30, 1–30.Google Scholar
Bornemissza, G. F. (1979). The Australian Dung Beetle Research Unit in Pretoria. — S. Afr. J. Sci. 75, 257–260.Google Scholar
Bryan, R. P. (1973). The effects of dung beetle activity on the numbers of parasitic gastrointestinal helminth larvae recovered from pasture samples.—Aust. J. agric. Res. 24, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincher, G. T. (1973). Nidification and reproduction of Phaneus spp. in three textural classes of soil (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). — Coleopts Bull. 27, 33–37.Google Scholar
Fincher, G. T., Stewar, T. B. & Davis, R. (1970). Attraction of coprophagous beetles to feces of various animals. — J. Parasit. 56, 378–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullaway, D. T. (1921). Horn fly control. — Hawaii. Forester Agric. 18, 219–221.Google Scholar
Halffter, G. & Matthews, E. G. (1966). The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). — Folia ent. Mex. no. 12–14.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. & Koskela, H. (1977). Niche relations amongst dung-inhabiting beetles.—Oecologia 28, 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howden, H. F. & Nealis, V. G. (1975). Effects of clearing in a tropical rain forest on the composition of the coprophagous scarab beetle fauna (Coleoptera). — Biotropica 7, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D. (1975). Assessment of the burial of cattle dung by Australian dung beetles. — J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 14, 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, J. L. Jr., & Hunter, J. S., III (1978). Introducing dung beetles as an aid in manure disposal and fly control. — Arkans. Fm Res. 27 4, 4.Google Scholar
MaCqueen, A. & Beirne, B. P. (1975). Influence of other insects on production of horn fly, Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae), from cattle dung in south–central British Columbia — Can. Ent. 107, 1255–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nealis, V. G. (1977). Habitat associations and community analysis of south Texas dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). — Can. J. Zool. 55, 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyndale-Biscoe, M.Wallace, M. M. H. & Walker, J. M. (1981). An ecological study of an Australian dung beetle, Onthophagus granulatus Boheman (Coleoptera:carabaeidae). using physiological age–grading techniques. — Bull. ent. Res. 71, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vuuren, D. J. (1979). Rapid determination of CBR with the portable dynamic cone penet–rometer. — Rhod. Engr Paper 161, 3 pp.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, D. F. (1974). The biological control of dung. — Scient. Am. 230, 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar