Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:38:59.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Grouping by Larval Characters of some Species of the Genus Apanteles (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. R. T. Short
J. R. T. Short
Affiliation:
University College of Hull.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The larval characters of 33 species (largely Palaearctic) of the genus Apanteles have been examined and studied in relation to the division of the species of the genus into four major groups on the characters of the adults. Ingeneral, the larval characters indicate a grouping of the species which is very similar to the grouping of the adults. Groups S and U contrast sharply with groups A and F on the form of the mandible. The form of the mandible also allows group A to be distinguishedfrom group F. The relationships of four aberrant and some other species are discussed.

I wish to thank Mr. J. F. Perkins of the British Museum (Natural History) and Professor G. C. Varley of the Hope Department of Entomology, Oxford, for permission to study material. Mr. G. E. J. Nixon's advice on the relationships indicated by the characters of the adults of the species of the genus Apanteles has been invaluable.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , July 1953 , pp. 327 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, N. R. (1946). Studies on parasites of the Spruce Budworm Archips fumiferana (Clem.). 1. Life history of Apanteles fumiferanae Viereck (Hymenoptera, Braconidae).—Canad. Ent., 78, pp. 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, B. B. (1940). The Hornworm parasite, Apanteles congregatus Say and the hyperparasite, Hypopteromalus tabacum (Fitch).—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer., 33, pp. 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloet, G. S. & Hincks, W. D. (1945). A check list of British insects.—483 pp. Stockport, the Authors.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. A. (1885). Monograph of British Braconidae. Part I.—Trans. ent. Soc. Lond., 1885, pp. 1–280.Google Scholar
Parker, D. L. (1935). Apanteles solitarius (Ratzeburg), an introduced Braconid parasite of the Satin moth.—Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 477, 17 pp.Google Scholar
Short, J. R. T. (1952). The morphology of the head of larval Hymenoptera with special reference to the head of Ichneumonoidea, including a classification of the final instar larvae of the Braconidae.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 103, pp. 27–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. (1935). Notes on Apanteles sesamiae, Cam., a parasite of the Maize Stalk-borer (Busseola fusca, Fuller) in South Africa.—Bull. ent. Res., 26, pp. 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, A. M. (1931). Apanteles thompsoni Lyle, a Braconid parasite of the European Corn Borer.—Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 233, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1932). A revision of the Ethiopian species of the genus Apanteles (Hym. Bracon.).—Trans. ent. Soc. Lond., 80, pp. 301–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar