Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:08:35.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic delineation of sibling species of the pest fruit fly Bactocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) using microsatellites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Y. Wang ,
H. Yu ,
K. Raphael  and
A.S. Gilchrist
Y. Wang
Affiliation:
Fruit Fly Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences A12, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
H. Yu
Affiliation:
Fruit Fly Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences A12, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
K. Raphael
Affiliation:
Fruit Fly Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences A12, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
A.S. Gilchrist*
Affiliation:
Fruit Fly Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences A12, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
*
*Fax: 61 2 9351 4771 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using a large set of microsatellites, the genetic relationships between three closely related Australian fruit fly species, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt), B. neohumeralis (Hardy) and B. aquilonis(May) were investigated. Bactrocera tryoni and B. neohumeralis are sympatric, while B. aquilonis is allopatric to both. The sympatric species, B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis, were found to be genetically distinct. It is likely that despite differences in mating time between these two species, some gene flow still occurs. In contrast, the sibling species B. tryoni and B. aquilonis were found to be closely related, despite allopatry. The level of genetic divergence was similar to that found within eastern Australian populations of B. tryoni. Consideration of all available genetic data suggests that this similarity is not due to recent (i.e. within the last 30 years) displacement of B. aquilonis by B. tryoni from the B. aquilonis region (north-western Australia). Instead the data suggests that, at least in the areas sampled, asymmetrical hybridization may have occurred over a longer timescale.

Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , July 2003 , pp. 351 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

An, X., Wilkes, K., Bastian, Y., Morrow, J.L., Frommer, M. & Raphael, K. (2002) The period gene in two species of tephritid fruit fly differentiated by mating behaviour. Insect Molecular Biology 11, 419–430.Google Scholar
Bateman, M.A. (1991) The impact of fruit flies on Australian horticulture. Horticultural Policy Council Report No. 3. Department of Primary Industries, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Drew, R.A.I. (1989) The tropical fruit flies Diptera (Tephritidae: Dacinae) of the Australasian and Oceanian regions. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 26, 1–521.Google Scholar
Drew, R.A.I. & Lambert, D.M. (1986) On the specific status of Dacus (Bactrocera) aquilonis and D. (Bactrocera) tryoni (Diptera, Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 79, 870–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, G.W. (1967) The comparative ecology of two closely related, sympatric species of Dacus (Diptera) in Queensland. Australian Journal of Zoology 15, 1123–1139.Google Scholar
Kinnear, M.W., Bariana, H.S., Sved, J.A. & Frommer, M. (1998) Polymorphic microsatellite markers for population analysis of a tephritid pest species, Bactrocera tryoni. Molecular Ecology 7, 1489–1495.Google Scholar
Lewis, P.O. & Zaykin, D. (2002) GDA: Software for the Analysis of Discrete Genetic Data, Version 1.1.Google Scholar
Mallet, J. (1995) A species definition for the Modern Synthesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10, 294–299.Google Scholar
Morrow, J., Scott, L., Congdon, B., Yeates, D., Frommer, M. & Sved, J. (2000) Close genetic similarity between two sympatric species of tephritid fruit fly reproductively isolated by mating time. Evolution 54, 899–910.Google ScholarPubMed
Osborne, R., Meats, A., Frommer, M., Sved, J.A., Drew, R.A.I. & Robson, M.K. (1997) Australian distribution of 17 species of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) caught in cue lure traps in February 1994. Australian Journal of Entomology 36, 45–50.Google Scholar
Patefield, W.M. (1981) An efficient method of generating random r × c tables with given row and column totals. Applied Statistics 30, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, N. & Meats, A. (2002) Potential for mating between Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Australian Journal of Entomology 41, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P.H. (1979) Genetic manipulation of the circadian clock's timing of sexual behaviour in the Queensland fruit flies, Dacus (Bactrocera) tryoni and Dacus (Bactrocera) neohumeralis. Physiological Entomology 4, 71–78.Google Scholar
Smith, P.T., Kambhampati, S. & Armstrong, K.A. (2003) Phylogenetic relationships among Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26, 8–17.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry. New York, W.H.Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Wang, R., Zheng, L.B., Toure, Y.T., Dandekar, T. & Kafatos, F.C. (2001) When genetic distance matters: measuring genetic differentiation at microsatellite loci in whole-genome scans of recent and incipient mosquito species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 10769–10774.Google Scholar
Weir, B.S. (1996) Genetic data analysis II: methods for discrete population genetic data. Sunderland, Massahusettes, Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Weir, B.S. & Cockerham, C.C. (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370.Google Scholar
Wolda, H. (1967) Reproductive isolation between two closely related species of the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus (Bactrocera) tryoni and D. (Bactrocera) neohumeralis (Diptera: Tephritidae) II. Genetic variation in humeral callus pattern in each species as compared with laboratory-bred hybrids. Australian Journal of Zoology 15, 515–539.Google Scholar
Yu, H. (2000) Population analysis of the Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni using microsatellite markers. MSc thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Yu, H., Frommer, M., Robson, M., Meats, A., Shearman, D.C.A. & Sved, J. (2001) Microsatellite analysis of the Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae) indicates spatial structuring: implications for population control. Bulletin of Entomological Research 91, 139–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, J.T., Frommer, M., Sved, J. & Gillies, C.B. (in press) Genetic and molecular markers in the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni. Journal of Heredity.Google Scholar