Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:48:41.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food-plant effects on larval performance do not translate into differences in fitness between populations of Panolis flammea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A.J. Vanbergen ,
D.J. Hodgson ,
M. Thurlow ,
S.E. Hartley  and
A.D. Watt
A.J. Vanbergen*
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Banchory, Hill of Brathens, Banchory, Aberdeenshire, AB31 4BW, UK
D.J. Hodgson
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK
M. Thurlow
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Banchory, Hill of Brathens, Banchory, Aberdeenshire, AB31 4BW, UK
S.E. Hartley
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Banchory, Hill of Brathens, Banchory, Aberdeenshire, AB31 4BW, UK
A.D. Watt
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Banchory, Hill of Brathens, Banchory, Aberdeenshire, AB31 4BW, UK
*
*Fax: 01330 823303 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the UK, Panolis flammea (Denis & Schiffermüller) is a pest of monocultures of non-native lodgepole pine Pinus contorta Douglas, but not of the indigenous host Scots pine P. sylvestrisL. This difference in population dynamics may be due to the adaptation of P. flammea populations to the phenology, chemical composition and natural enemy complement of lodgepole pine. To ascertain if there was local adaptation of P. flammea populations to lodgepole pine, this study tested for improved performance of both larvae and adults on the host plant species from which they were sourced, compared with their performance on the alternative host plant species. No difference was found in the relative mean performance of populations sourced from Scots pine or lodgepole pine plantations, when fed on Scots or lodgepole pine foliage. Larvae grew faster on Scots pine but this difference did not translate into differences in pupal weight, female body weight or fecundity. Indeed, those insects that had fed on lodgepole pine had a longer lifespan than those that had fed on Scots pine, which, if translated into greater probability of mating or higher fecundity, could contribute to the observed outbreak dynamics in the field. The prediction that the observed outbreak dynamics of P. flammea can be explained by the existence of populations locally adapted to lodgepole pine was not supported. These results cast doubt on the use of larval growth parameters as surrogates of fitness in Lepidoptera.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 93 , Issue 6 , December 2003 , pp. 553 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aergeter, J.N. (1997) A three trophic level interaction: the influence of the host plant (lodgeple pine, Pinus contorta Douglas), on the vulnerability of a herbivore (pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea) to its parasitoids PhD thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Docherty, M. & Leather, S.R. (1997) Structure and abundance of arachnid communities in Scots and lodgepole pine plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 95, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumerle, P. (1983) Comparative phenology of two oaks (Quercus pubescens and Quercus ilex) and of Tortrix viridana L. (Lep, Tortricidae)–evidence for the existence of two sympatric populations of the insect, each adapted to one of the oak species. Acta Oecologica-Oecologia Applicata 4, 55–74.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R. & Raven, P.H. (1969) Differentiation of populations. Science 165, 1228–1232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feder, J.L., Chilcote, C.A. & Bush, G.L. (1990) The geographic pattern of genetic differentiation between host associated populations of Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera, Tephritidae) in the Eastern United States and Canada. Evolution 44, 570–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeny, P. (1970) Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51, 565–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R.A. (1920) Some remarks on the methods formulated in a recent article on ‘The quantitative analysis of plant growth'. Annals of Applied Biology 7, 367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futuyma, D.J. & Peterson, S.C. (1985) Genetic variation in the use of resources by insects. Annual Review of Entomology 30, 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futuyma, D.J. & Philippi, T.E. (1987) Genetic variation and covariation in responses to host plants by Alsophila pometaria (Lepidoptera, Geometridae). Evolution 41, 269–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanks, L.M. & Denno, R.F. (1994) Local adaptation in the armored scale insect Pseudaulacaspis pentagona (Homoptera, Diaspididae). Ecology 75, 2301–2310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, B.J. (2001) The history, ecology and potential control of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Scotland PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hicks, B.J. & Watt, A.D. (2000) Fungal disease and parasitism in Panolis flammea during 1998: evidence of change in the diversity and impact of the natural enemies of a forest pest. Forestry 73, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karban, R. (1989) Fine-scale adaptation of herbivorous thrips to individual host plants. Nature 340, 60–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimetzek, D. (1972) Die zeitfolge von übervermehrungen nadelfressender kiefernraupen in der Pfalz seit 1810 und die ursachen ihres rückganges in neur Zeit. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 71, 414–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S.R. (1984) The effect of adult feeding on the fecundity, weight-loss and survival of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (D-and-S). Oecologia 65, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leather, S.R. (1985) Oviposition preferences in relation to larval growth-rates and survival in the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea. Ecological Entomology 10, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S.R. & Burnand, A.C. (1987) Factors affecting life-history parameters of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (D&S): the hidden costs of reproduction. Functional Ecology 1, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S.R., Watt, A.D. & Barbour, D.A. (1985) The effect of host plant and delayed mating on the fecundity and life-span of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (Denis & Schiffermuller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)–their influence on population dynamics and relevance to pest management. Bulletin of Entomological Research 75, 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S.R., Beare, J.A., Cooke, R.C.A. & Fellowes, M.D.E. (1998) Are differences in life history parameters of the pine beauty moth Panolis flammea modified by host plant quality or gender? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 87, 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, A. (1996) A trade-off for host plant utilization in the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae. Evolution 50, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitter, C., Futuyma, D.J., Schneider, J.C. & Hare, D. (1979) Genetic variation and host relations of a parthenogenetic moth. Evolution 33, 777–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mopper, S. (1996) Adaptive genetic structure in phytophagous insect populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11, 235–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mopper, S., Beck, M., Simberloff, D., Stiling, P. (1995) Local adaptation and agents of selection in a mobile insect. Evolution 49, 810–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mopper, S., Stiling, P., Landau, K., Simberloff, D. & Van Zandt, P. (2000) Spatiotemporal variation in leafminer population structure and adaptation to individual oak trees. Ecology 81, 1577–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, P.J. (1967) Growth analysis formulae-their use and abuse. Crop Science 7, 171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rausher, M.D. (1982) Population differentiation in Euphydryas editha butterflies-larval adaptation to different hosts. Evolution 36, 581–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoakley, J.T. (1977) A severe outbreak of the pine beauty moth on lodgepole pine in Sutherland. Scottish Forestry 31, 113–125.Google Scholar
Traxler, M.A. & Joern, A. (1999) Performance tradeoffs for two hosts within and between populations of the oligophagous grasshopper Hesperotettix viridis (Acrididae). Oikos 87, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zandt, P.A. & Mopper, S. (1998) A meta-analysis of adaptive deme formation in phytophagous insect populations. American Naturalist 152, 595–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Via, S. (1984) The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. 1. genotype-environment interaction in larval performance on different host plant species. Evolution 38, 881–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Via, S. (1990) Ecological genetics and host adaptation in herbivorous insects-the experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems. Annual Review of Entomology 35, 421–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wainhouse, D. & Jukes, M.R. (1997) Geographic variation within populations of Panolis flammea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Britain. Bulletin of Entomological Research 87, 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, P.J., Day, K.R., Leather, S.R. & Smith, A. (1993) The influence of soil type and pine species on the carabid community of a plantation forest with a history of pine beauty moth infestation. Forestry 66, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, A.D. (1987) The effect of shoot growth stage of Pinus contorta and Pinus sylvestris on the growth and survival of Panolis flammea larvae. Oecologia 72, 429–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watt, A.D. (1989a) The growth and survival of Panolis flammea larvae in the absence of predators on Scots pine and lodgepole pine. Ecological Entomology 14, 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, A.D. (1989b) The chemical composition of pine foliage in relation to the population dynamics of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea, in Scotland. Oecologia 78, 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, A.D. (1992) The influence of pine shoot phenology on the survival of pine beauty moth (Panolis flammea) larvae on different pine provenances. Forest Ecology and Management 47, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, A.D. & Leather, S.R. (1988) The distribution of eggs laid by the pine beauty moth Panolis flammea (Denis & Schiff.) (Lep, Noctuidae) on lodgepole pine. Journal of Applied Entomology-Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 106, 108–110.Google Scholar
Watt, A.D., Leather, S.R. & Stoakley, J.T. (1989) Site susceptibility, population development and dispersal of the pine beauty moth in a lodgepole pine plantation in northern Scotland. Journal of Applied Ecology 26, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, A.D., Leather, S.R. & Forrest, G.I. (1991a) The effect of previous defoliation of pole stage lodgepole pine on plant chemistry, and on the growth and survival of pine beauty moth (Panolis flammea) larvae. Oecologia 86, 31–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watt, A.D., Leather, S.R. & Evans, H.F. (1991b) Outbreaks of the pine beauty moth on pine in Scotland-influence of host plant species and site factors. Forest Ecology and Management 39, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar