Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:34:59.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field trials of double translocation heterozygote males for genetic control of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. L. Petersen ,
L. P. Lounibos  and
Nancy Lorimer
J. L. Petersen
Affiliation:
Mosquito Biology Unit, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P. O. Box 80804, Mombasa, Kenya
L. P. Lounibos
Affiliation:
Mosquito Biology Unit, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P. O. Box 80804, Mombasa, Kenya
Nancy Lorimer
Affiliation:
Mosquito Biology Unit, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P. O. Box 80804, Mombasa, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For nine weeks from 14 April to 13 June 1975 an average of over 500 double translocation heterozygote male Aedes aegypti (L.) were released daily into a village where the estimated adult mosquito population was 1200. The two purposes of this release were to suppress the A. aegypti population by sterility induced by chromosomal translocations and to assess the effect of rainy season conditions on the population dynamics of the indigenous and released mosquitoes. As a result of the releases, hatchabirity of eggs from females collected during landing-biting catches dropped from over 93% to 30–40%. For eight weeks following the termination of the releases, hatchability remained below 70% while that of the reference village averaged between 80 and 99% hatch. A relative population decline observed in the release village is not attributed solely to the effect of the releases, partly because it occurred before sufficient time had elapsed to allow induced sterility to build up in the field population.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 313 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Craig, G. B., Hickey, W. A.. (1967). Genetics of Aedes aegypti. pp. 67–131 in Wright, J. W., Pal, R.. (Eds). Genetics of insect vectors of Disease. — 794 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C. F.. (1968). A possible genetic method for the control of insect pests, with special reference to tsetse flies (Glossina spp.). — Bull. ent. Res. 57, 509–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C. F.., Grover, K. K.., Suguna, S. G.., Uppal, D. K.., Dietz, K.., Agarwal, H. V., Kazmi, S. J.. (1976). Comparative fieldcagetestsofthe population suppressing efficiency of three genetic control systems for Aedes aegypti. — Heredity. 36, 11–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, G.. (1974). Genetic control of insect pests. — 158 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grover, K. K.., Suguna, S. G.., Uppal, D. K.., Singh, K. R. P.., Ansari, M. A.., Curtis, C. F.., Singh, D.., Sharma, V. P., Panicker, K. N. (1976). Field experiments on the competitiveness of males carrying genetic control systems for Aedes aegypti. — Entomologia exp. appl. 20, 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallinan, E.., Lorimer, N., Rai, K. S.. (1976). Genetic manipulation of Aedes aegypti. II. A cytogenetic study of radiation induced translocations in DELHI strain. — Proc. XV Int. Congr. Ent. August 19–27, 1976, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., pp. 117–128.Google Scholar
Hartberg, W. K.. (1971). Observations on the mating behaviour of Aedes aegypti in nature. — Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 45, 847–850.Google ScholarPubMed
Jolly, G. M.. (1965). Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. — Biometrika. 52, 225–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorimer, N.., Lounibos, L. P., Petersen, J. L. (1976). Field trials with a translocation homozygote in Aedes aegypti for population replacement. — J. econ. Ent. 69, 405–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattingly, P. F.. (1957). Genetical aspects of the Aedes aegypti problem I.—Taxonomy and bionomics. — Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 51, 392–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P. T.., Hauserman, W., Lorimer, N.. (in press). Sterility introduced by release of genetically altered males to a domestic population of Aedes aegypti at the Kenya coast. — Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. T., Rai, K. S.. (1971). Population control potential of heterozygous trans-locations as determined by computer simulations. — Bull Wld Hlth Org. 44, 829–845.Google Scholar
Rai, K. S., Asman, M.. (1968). Possible application of a reciprocal translocation for genetic control of the mosquito, Aedes aegypti. — Proc. XII int. Congr. Genetics. 1, 164.Google Scholar
Rai, K. S.., Grover, K. K., Suguna, S. G.. (1973). Genetic manipulation of Aedes aegypti: incorporation and maintenance of a genetic marker and a chromosomal translocation in natural populations. — Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 48, 49–56.Google Scholar
Rai, K. S.., Lorimer, N., Hallinan, E. M.. (1974). The current status of genetic methods for controlling Aedes aegypti. pp. 119–132 in Pal, R., Whitten, M. J.. (Eds). The use of genetics in insect control.— 241 pp.Amsterdam, Elsevier/North-Holland.Google Scholar
Rai, K. S.., Mcdonald, P. T., Ashman, S. M.. (1970). Cytogenetics of two radiation-induced, sex-linked translocations in the yellow-fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. — Genetics, Princeton. 66, 635–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, A. S.. (1976). Progress in the use of chromosomal translocations for the control of insect pests. — Biol. Rev. 51, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seawright, J. A.., Kaiser, P. E.., Jinling, Y. E. H., Stevenson, H. R.. (1975a). Reciprocal translocations in Aedes aegypti (L.). — Mosq. News. 35, 384–388.Google Scholar
Seawright, J. A.., Kaiser, P. E.., Dame, D. A., Willis, N. L.. (1975b). Field competitiveness of males of Aedes aegypti (L.) heterozygous for a translocation. — Mosq. News. 35, 30–33.Google Scholar
Seawright, J. A.., Kaiser, P. E., WILLIS, N. L., Dame, D. A.. (1976). Field competitiveness of double translocation heterozygote males of Aedes aegypti (L.). — J. med. Ent. 13, 208–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serebrovskii, A. S.. (1940).On the possibility of a new method for the control of insect pests.—Zool. Zh. 19, 618–630, [in Russian]. [English translation pp. 123–137 in Doyle, E., Freeman, S. M.. (Eds) (1969). Sterile-male technique for eradication or control of harmful insects. IAEA publication STI/PUB/224, Vienna, 42 pp.]Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J.. (1969). Biometry. — 776 pp.San Francisco, Freeman.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E.., Murdie, G.., Yasuno, M.., Tonn, R. J., Reader, P. M.. (1972). Studies on the life budget of Aedes aegypti in Wat Samphaya, Bangkok, Thailand. — Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 46, 211–226.Google ScholarPubMed
Trpis, M., Hausermann, W.. (1975). Demonstration, of differential domesticity of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera, Culicidae) in Africa by mark-release-recapture. — Bull. ent. Res. 65, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uppal, D. K., Curtis, C. F., Rai, K. S.. (1974). A double translocation heterozygote in Aedes aegypti. — J. communicable Dis. 6, 98–101.Google Scholar